\u201cJust because something\u2019s always been that way doesn\u2019t mean that that\u2019s a good reason to keep it,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
The general requirement is that patrons have to order a \u201csubstantial meal\u201d, but McAnulty said that was not defined, and patrons were not required to eat it anyway.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat is a bit of a farce of a situation. So all we\u2019re doing is clearing it up that those businesses that are already able to operate anyway can do so under normal conditions, and those that can\u2019t like off-licences and supermarkets, they remain restricted, but for those on-licences that are already operating, they can do so normally.\u201d<\/p>\n
The bill was up for its third reading on Wednesday. Exactly when depended on other legislation scheduled to be debated first.<\/p>\n
If the bill passes, it is possible it may receive royal assent on Thursday, in time for Good Friday.<\/p>\n
McAnulty said the timing was a \u201csticking point\u201d, but as some Government bills were scheduled to receive royal assent on Thursday he was hopeful his could be included with those.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s quite fortuitous timing, I think, the way that it\u2019s played out. And really, we\u2019re at the mercy and availability of Her Excellency, and I\u2019m not of a mind to flick a text to the Governor-General and ask for a solid, so I\u2019m quite happy with the way that it\u2019s played out, and hopefully it does follow through.\u201d<\/p>\n
Parliament treats alcohol legislation as a conscience matter, meaning MPs vote according to their personal view or what they think is best for their electorate or community, rather than as a party bloc.<\/p>\n
It means some of McAnulty\u2019s own Labour colleagues may choose to oppose his bill, but the MP was optimistic he had the numbers across the House to pass.<\/p>\n
McAnulty\u2019s original intent was to permit any premises allowed to operate on those public holidays to sell alcohol, which would have included supermarkets but not bottle shops.<\/p>\n
But he said it was changed to keep things simple, and only applies to on-licence venues.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s proven to be the right decision, because we\u2019ve maintained enough support in Parliament,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cI know that if we\u2019d stuck with off-licences or supermarkets, there are people who would have withdrawn their support, and it probably wouldn\u2019t have passed.\u201d<\/p>\n
An amendment proposed by Act MP Cameron Luxton has been adopted into the bill.<\/p>\n
Luxton\u2019s amendment means bars can open after midnight on Anzac and Easter holidays.<\/p>\n
The Act MP was hopeful it would be in place in time for the Super Round at Christchurch\u2019s new stadium, which will involve 10 Super Rugby Pacific teams playing over the weekend of April 24-26.<\/p>\n
Luxton said it would mean punters coming to enjoy the new stadium would not be kicked out at midnight for Anzac Day.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s a huge opening that Christchurch is going to be able to make a great deal out of.\u201d<\/p>\n
He said it would change the \u201cyou don\u2019t have to go home, but you can\u2019t stay here\u201d regime currently in place.<\/p>\n
\u201cWho knows what\u2019s happening on the streets after that? This bill will enable licensed premises with safety procedures and alcohol policies in place to continue giving people the entertainment, the nightlife that they would like in a responsible and safe way.\u201d<\/p>\n
McAnulty said Luxton\u2019s amendment was consistent with the intention of the bill, and he was happy to support it.<\/p>\n
\u201cI know that the hospitality businesses in Christchurch are very happy about that, because when their stadium opens and people leave, they won\u2019t have to then be kicked out of the hospitality businesses at midnight because it\u2019s Anzac Day the following day.\u201d<\/p>\n
McAnulty, a Catholic, was less concerned with religious opposition to the bill, but understood why people might be opposed on health grounds.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s a valid concern, but because the bill only targets those on-licensed premises that are already able to operate, it\u2019s actually not going to expand the number of premises that can provide alcohol. It just means they don\u2019t have to jump through these ridiculous hoops in order to be able to do it.\u201d<\/p>\n
This is not the only piece of legislation that would liberalise alcohol trading laws if it passes through Parliament this term.<\/p>\n
The Government is working through its own piece of legislation to allow restaurants with on-site retail spaces to sell take-home alcoholic beverages, if they also sell takeaway food or non-alcoholic beverages prepared by the business.<\/p>\n
Luxton\u2019s own member\u2019s bill to repeal alcohol restrictions on Good Friday and Easter Sunday was voted down at first reading in 2024. That bill would have repealed Good Friday and Easter Sunday as restricted trading days altogether.<\/p>\n
Luxton said McAnulty\u2019s bill was \u201cdealing with an element\u201d of what his bill had set out to do.<\/p>\n
Another bill by National\u2019s Stuart Smith to allow winery cellar doors to charge visitors for samples and add off-licence categories for wineries holding an on-licence passed successfully through the House in 2024.<\/p>\n
Law a \u2018fly in the ointment\u2019<\/p>\n
Mike Egan, president of the Restaurant Association and co-owner of Wellington restaurant Monsoon Poon, said the present law was a \u201crelic from the 1800s\u201d and a \u201cfly in the ointment\u201d for businesses like his.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe rule is you\u2019re meant to partake in a substantial meal in a pub over Easter on the Friday, and tourists are sort of like, \u2018Oh, we\u2019ve eaten, we just all come here for a nightcap\u2019, or, \u2018We just want to have a snack, and you know, we\u2019re wandering around town trying different restaurants and cafes\u2019, and it\u2019s like, \u2018No, I\u2019m really sorry, you need to have another meal\u2026\u2019<\/p>\n
\u201cPeople will order a whole meal and not even eat it because the law doesn\u2019t say they actually have to eat it, they just have to have it sitting there in front of them. It\u2019s just a little bit old-fashioned.\u201d<\/p>\n
He said the law change would not result in \u201call this debauchery on Good Friday\u201d.<\/p>\n
\u201c[Customers] just want to have a beer in the afternoon after they\u2019ve had a bike ride down the vineyards. So it\u2019s very sort of frustrating trying to police this legislation.\u201d<\/p>\n
He said if the bill was passed staff would no longer have to act as police officers, checking how much food each customer had ordered.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019ll just make it easier and it\u2019ll flow like a regular weekend. It will boost business [and] take away a lot of confusion.\u201d<\/p>\n
Families struggling with alcohol harm would be worse off \u2013 public health adviser<\/p>\n
Alcohol HealthWatch senior health promotion adviser Sarah Sneyd told Checkpoint she understood people may view the bill as a small change but it was one that would make access to alcohol slightly easier.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have some data from police and emergency departments that show there are fewer alcohol-related assaults and ED presentations over the Easter break and that could very well be because it\u2019s harder to access alcohol.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sneyd believed there would be real repercussions from changing the restrictions.<\/p>\n
\u201cI think it really speaks to a symptom of a deeper problem in our culture that we can\u2019t even go a couple of days without access to alcohol. Once again we make it easier to access alcohol on the couple of days where there are some restrictions around it.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is not what we hear communities want.\u201d<\/p>\n
Sneyd said New Zealand was \u201csaturated\u201d with alcohol and it was a problem with very few protections.<\/p>\n
\u2013 RNZ<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u201cJust because something\u2019s always been that way doesn\u2019t mean that that\u2019s a good reason to keep it,\u201d he…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":359126,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[20784,5195,3595,124,12205,171628,4999,96265,2219,6101,111,43,139,69,90,54895,667,10809,4767],"class_list":["post-359125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-new-zealand","tag-alcohol","tag-be","tag-by","tag-could","tag-dexter","tag-easter","tag-friday","tag-giles","tag-gone","tag-good","tag-new-zealand","tag-news","tag-newzealand","tag-nz","tag-on","tag-restrictions","tag-sales","tag-sunday","tag-weekend"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=359125"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/359125\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/359126"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=359125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=359125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=359125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}