Luger, K., M\u00e4der, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F. & Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8\u2009\u00c5 resolution. Nature 389, 251\u2013260 (1997).<\/p>\n
Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289\u2013293 (2009).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376\u2013380 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665\u20131680 (2014).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Cremer, T. & Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 292\u2013301 (2001).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sanborn, A. L. et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6456\u2013E6465 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Fudenberg, G. et al. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Rep. 15, 2038\u20132049 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Barbieri, M. et al. Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16173\u201316178 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Jost, D., Carrivain, P., Cavalli, G. & Vaillant, C. Modeling epigenome folding: formation and dynamics of topologically associated chromatin domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 9553\u20139561 (2014).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Strom, A. R. et al. Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation. Nature 547, 241\u2013245 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sabari, B. R. et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science 361, eaar3958 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Shah, F. R., Bhat, Y. A. & Wani, A. H. Subnuclear distribution of proteins: links with genome architecture. Nucleus 9, 42\u201355 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bonev, B. & Cavalli, G. Organization and function of the 3D genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 661\u2013678 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Erdel, F., Baum, M. & Rippe, K. The viscoelastic properties of chromatin and the nucleoplasm revealed by scale-dependent protein mobility. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 064115 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rippe, K. Liquid\u2013liquid phase separation in chromatin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 14, a040683 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Li, X., An, Z., Zhang, W. & Li, F. Phase separation: direct and indirect driving force for high-order chromatin organization. Genes 14, 499 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Singer, S. J. & Nicolson, G. L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 175, 720\u2013731 (1972).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lombard, J. Once upon a time the cell membranes: 175 years of cell boundary research. Biol. Direct 9, 32 (2014).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sezgin, E., Levental, I., Mayor, S. & Eggeling, C. The mystery of membrane organization: composition, regulation and roles of lipid rafts. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 361\u2013374 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Frye, L. D. & Edidin, M. The rapid intermixing of cell surface antigens after formation of mouse\u2013human heterokaryons. J. Cell Sci. 7, 319\u2013335 (1970).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Fedorova, E. & Zink, D. Nuclear architecture and gene regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1783, 2174\u20132184 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lammerding, J. Mechanics of the nucleus. Compr. Physiol. 1, 783\u2013807 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zink, D. et al. Structure and dynamics of human interphase chromosome territories in vivo. Hum. Genet. 102, 241\u2013251 (1998).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Child, M. B. V. I. et al. Live imaging and biophysical modelling support a button-based mechanism of somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila. eLife 10, e64412 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hsieh, T.-H. S. et al. Mapping nucleosome-resolution chromosome folding in yeast by Micro-C. Cell 162, 108\u2013119 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Belaghzal, H. et al. Liquid chromatin Hi-C characterizes compartment-dependent chromatin interaction dynamics. Nat. Genet. 53, 367\u2013378 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wang, S. et al. Spatial organization of chromatin domains and compartments in single chromosomes. Science 353, 598\u2013602 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458\u2013472 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Fouziya, S. et al. Genome wide nucleosome landscape shapes 3D chromatin organization. Sci. Adv. 10, eadn2955 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Eres, I. E. & Gilad, Y. A TAD skeptic: is 3D genome topology conserved? Trends Genet. 37, 216\u2013223 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Basu, A. et al. Measuring DNA mechanics on the genome scale. Nature 589, 462\u2013467 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Struhl, K. & Segal, E. Determinants of nucleosome positioning. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 267\u2013273 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Achar, Y. J. et al. Negative supercoil at gene boundaries modulates gene topology. Nature 577, 701\u2013705 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Jabbari, K., Chakraborty, M. & Wiehe, T. DNA sequence-dependent chromatin architecture and nuclear hubs formation. Sci. Rep. 9, 14646 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ram\u00edrez, F. et al. High-resolution TADs reveal DNA sequences underlying genome organization in flies. Nat. Commun. 9, 189 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Oberbeckmann, E. et al. In vitro reconstitution of chromatin domains shows a role for nucleosome positioning in 3D genome organization. Nat. Genet. 56, 483\u2013492 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wiese, O., Marenduzzo, D. & Brackley, C. A. Nucleosome positions alone can be used to predict domains in yeast chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 17307\u201317315 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gibson, B. A. et al. Organization of chromatin by intrinsic and regulated phase separation. Cell 179, 470\u2013484.e21 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wani, A. H. et al. Chromatin topology is coupled to Polycomb group protein subnuclear organization. Nat. Commun. 7, 10291 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Plys, A. J. et al. Phase separation of Polycomb-repressive complex 1 is governed by a charged disordered region of CBX2. Genes Dev. 33, 799\u2013813 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Seif, E. et al. Phase separation by the polyhomeotic sterile alpha motif compartmentalizes Polycomb group proteins and enhances their activity. Nat. Commun. 11, 5609 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lee, R. et al. CTCF-mediated chromatin looping provides a topological framework for the formation of phase-separated transcriptional condensates. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 207\u2013226 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Yang, J. G., Madrid, T. S., Sevastopoulos, E. & Narlikar, G. J. The chromatin-remodeling enzyme ACF is an ATP-dependent DNA length sensor that regulates nucleosome spacing. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 1078\u20131083 (2006).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gkikopoulos, T. et al. A role for Snf2-related nucleosome-spacing enzymes in genome-wide nucleosome organization. Science 333, 1758\u20131760 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Oberbeckmann, E. et al. Genome information processing by the INO80 chromatin remodeler positions nucleosomes. Nat. Commun. 12, 3231 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sundaramoorthy, R. Nucleosome remodelling: structural insights into ATP-dependent remodelling enzymes. Essays Biochem 63, 45\u201358 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Li, Y. et al. The emerging role of ISWI chromatin remodeling complexes in cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 40, 346 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 de Wit, E. et al. CTCF binding polarity determines chromatin looping. Mol. Cell 60, 676\u2013684 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ricci, M. A. et al. Chromatin fibers are formed by heterogeneous groups of nucleosomes in vivo. Cell 160, 1145\u20131158 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Nozaki, T. et al. Dynamic organization of chromatin domains revealed by super-resolution live-cell imaging. Mol. Cell 67, 282\u2013293.e7 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ohno, M. et al. Sub-nucleosomal genome structure reveals distinct nucleosome folding motifs. Cell 176, 520\u2013534.e25 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Krietenstein, N. et al. Ultrastructural details of mammalian chromosome architecture. Mol. Cell 78, 554\u2013565.e7 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Phair, R. D. et al. Global nature of dynamic protein\u2013chromatin interactions in vivo: three-dimensional genome scanning and dynamic interaction networks of chromatin proteins. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 6393\u20136402 (2004).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Nissim-Rafinia, M. & Meshorer, E. Photobleaching assays (FRAP and FLIP) to measure chromatin protein dynamics in living embryonic stem cells. J. Vis. Exp. 52, 2696 (2011).<\/p>\n Li, G., Levitus, M., Bustamante, C. & Widom, J. Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 46\u201353 (2005).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Fierz, B. & Poirier, M. G. Biophysics of chromatin dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 48, 321\u2013345 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ramachandran, S., Ahmad, K. & Henikoff, S. Transcription and remodeling produce asymmetrically unwrapped nucleosomal intermediates. Mol. Cell 68, 1038\u20131053.e4 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 B\u00f6hm, V. et al. Nucleosome accessibility governed by the dimer\/tetramer interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 3093\u20133102 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Iida, S. et al. Single-nucleosome imaging reveals steady-state motion of interphase chromatin in living human cells. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn5626 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Caragine, C. M., Haley, S. C. & Zidovska, A. Nucleolar dynamics and interactions with nucleoplasm in living cells. eLife 8, e47533 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zidovska, A. The rich inner life of the cell nucleus: dynamic organization, active flows, and emergent rheology. Biophys. Rev. 12, 1093\u20131106 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Richter, K., Nessling, M. & Lichter, P. Experimental evidence for the influence of molecular crowding on nuclear architecture. J. Cell Sci. 120, 1673\u20131680 (2007).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Farr, S. E., Woods, E. J., Joseph, J. A., Garaizar, A. & Collepardo-Guevara, R. Nucleosome plasticity is a critical element of chromatin liquid\u2013liquid phase separation and multivalent nucleosome interactions. Nat. Commun. 12, 2883 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Qiu, Y. et al. Nucleosome condensate and linker DNA alter chromatin folding pathways and rates. Biophys. J. 125, 282\u2013293 (2026).<\/p>\n Isono, K. et al. SAM domain polymerization links subnuclear clustering of PRC1 to gene silencing. Dev. Cell 26, 565\u2013577 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Boehning, M. et al. RNA polymerase II clustering through carboxy-terminal domain phase separation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 833\u2013840 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hnisz, D., Shrinivas, K., Young, R. A., Chakraborty, A. K. & Sharp, P. A. A phase separation model for transcriptional control. Cell 169, 13\u201323 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Vivante, A., Bronshtein, I. & Garini, Y. Chromatin viscoelasticity measured by local dynamic analysis. Biophys. J. 118, 2258\u20132267 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hertzog, M. & Erdel, F. The material properties of the cell nucleus: a matter of scale. Cells 12, 1958 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Oji, A., Choubani, L., Miura, H. & Hiratani, I. Structure and dynamics of nuclear A\/B compartments and subcompartments. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 90, 102406 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wang, L. et al. Histone modifications regulate chromatin compartmentalization by contributing to a phase separation mechanism. Mol. Cell 76, 646\u2013659.e6 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Olvera de la Cruz, M. Theory of microphase separation in block copolymer solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1995\u20132002 (1989).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Di Pierro, M. et al. Transferable model for chromosome architecture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12168\u201312173 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Falk, M. et al. Heterochromatin drives compartmentalization of inverted and conventional nuclei. Nature 570, 395\u2013399 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wei, C. et al. CTCF organizes inter-A compartment interactions through RYBP-dependent phase separation. Cell Res 32, 744\u2013760 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bintu, B. et al. Super-resolution chromatin tracing reveals domains and cooperative interactions in single cells. Science 362, eaau1783 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Finn, E. H. et al. Extensive heterogeneity and intrinsic variation in spatial genome organization. Cell 176, 1502\u20131515.e10 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Conte, M. et al. Polymer physics indicates chromatin folding variability across single cells results from state degeneracy in phase separation. Nat. Commun. 11, 3289 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Murphy, S. E. & Boettiger, A. N. Polycomb repression of Hox genes involves spatial feedback but not domain compaction or phase transition. Nat. Genet. 56, 493\u2013504 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zidovska, A., Weitz, D. A. & Mitchison, T. J. Micron-scale coherence in interphase chromatin dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15555\u201315560 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Shi, G., Liu, L., Hyeon, C. & Thirumalai, D. Interphase human chromosome exhibits out-of-equilibrium glassy dynamics. Nat. Commun. 9, 3161 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Park, J., Kim, J. J. & Ryu, J. K. Mechanism of phase condensation for chromosome architecture and function. Exp. Mol. Med. 56, 809\u2013819 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Fujishiro, S. & Sasai, M. Generation of dynamic three-dimensional genome structure through phase separation of chromatin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2109838119 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Feric, M. & Misteli, T. Phase separation in genome organization across evolution. Trends Cell Biol. 31, 671\u2013685 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zhao, J. Z., Xia, J. & Brangwynne, C. P. Chromatin compaction during confined cell migration induces and reshapes nuclear condensates. Nat. Commun. 15, 9964 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Jo, H., Kim, T., Chun, Y., Jung, I. & Lee, D. A compendium of chromatin contact maps reflecting regulation by chromatin remodelers in budding yeast. Nat. Commun. 12, 6380 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moore, C. et al. ATP-dependent remodeling of chromatin condensates uncovers distinct mesoscale effects of two remodelers. Science 390, eadr0018 (2025).<\/p>\n Mann, R. & Notani, D. Transcription factor condensates and signaling-driven transcription. Nucleus 14, 2205758 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Kim, Y. J. et al. Light-activated macromolecular phase separation modulates transcription by reconfiguring chromatin interactions. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg1123 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Liu, Z. et al. Linking genome structures to functions by simultaneous single-cell Hi-C and RNA-seq. Science 380, 1070\u20131076 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Marenduzzo, D., Micheletti, C. & Cook, P. R. Entropy-driven genome organization. Biophys. J. 90, 3712\u20133721 (2006).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Cook, P. R. & Marenduzzo, D. Entropic organization of interphase chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 186, 825\u2013834 (2009).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wang, B. et al. The molecular basis of lamin-specific chromatin interactions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 32, 1999\u20132011 (2025).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Briand, N. & Collas, P. Lamina-associated domains: peripheral matters and internal affairs. Genome Biol. 21, 85 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pujadas Liwag, A. et al. Depletion of lamins B1 and B2 promotes chromatin mobility and induces differential gene expression by a mesoscale-motion-dependent mechanism. Genome Biol. 25, 77 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Alagna, N. S., Thomas, T. I., Wilson, K. L. & Reddy, K. L. Choreography of lamina-associated domains: structure meets dynamics. Trends Cell Biol. 34, 1\u201315 (2024).<\/p>\n Lee, J. et al. Kinetic organization of the genome revealed by ultraresolution multiscale live imaging. Science 389, eadx2202 (2025).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hancock, R. & Jeon, W. K. New models of the cell nucleus: crowding, entropic forces, phase separation, and fractals. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 307, 1\u201344 (2014).<\/p>\n Collette, D., Dunlap, D. & Finzi, L. Macromolecular crowding and DNA: bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 17502 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Du, M. et al. Direct observation of a condensate effect on super-enhancer-controlled gene bursting. Cell 187, 331\u2013344 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Cavalheiro, G. R., Pollex, T. & Furlong, E. E. To loop or not to loop: what is the role of TADs in enhancer function and gene regulation? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 67, 119\u2013129 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Luger, K., M\u00e4der, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F. & Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":386515,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[200351,2294,6422,200352,111,139,69,147],"class_list":{"0":"post-386514","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-science","8":"tag-chromatin-structure","9":"tag-general","10":"tag-life-sciences","11":"tag-nanoscale-biophysics","12":"tag-new-zealand","13":"tag-newzealand","14":"tag-nz","15":"tag-science"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=386514"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/386514\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/386515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=386514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=386514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=386514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}