{"id":408096,"date":"2026-05-02T08:29:14","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T08:29:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/408096\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T08:29:14","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T08:29:14","slug":"angry-farmer-confronts-burnout-teens-with-tractor-metal-pole","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/408096\/","title":{"rendered":"Angry farmer confronts burnout teens with tractor, metal pole"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By Belinda Feek, Open Justice reporter<\/p>\n<p>After a series of burnouts, toots and taunts, a carload of young people turned up to a farmer&#8217;s property for a fourth time, but this time he surprised them with his tractor.<\/p>\n<p>Durk De Boer raised the tractor&#8217;s bucket towards the bonnet of the bright yellow Toyota 4WD before getting off and marching angrily up to them, armed with a metal pole.<\/p>\n<p>What followed next was disputed in court &#8211; the teen driver said he was assaulted and only there to &#8220;look at the lasers&#8221;, while the farmer said he was simply defending his property.<\/p>\n<p>But a judge ruled in De Boer&#8217;s favour, and said the teens told lies and were deliberately being a nuisance that night.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They were enticing a reaction, they wanted a reaction, and they got a reaction,&#8221; Judge Philip Crayton said when reading out his reserved decision recently.<\/p>\n<p>He ruled that the reaction wasn&#8217;t an assault but reasonable force to stop the teens from trespassing on his Waikato property on the night of November 2, 2023.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This was not about lasers; this was about the complainant and his friends making nuisances out of themselves, no doubt having what they viewed as fun.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It started with burnouts and noise, and it seems pretty clearly shown that it was intended to wind up a local resident; that&#8217;s why they returned a short time later.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I do accept that the defendant was plainly, and understandably, very angry.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The defendant went to ensure that the [complainant] and his friends stopped trespassing on his property, and of course, he was entitled to use reasonable force to prevent trespass.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The judge said he was &#8220;absolutely satisfied that any threat, or minor striking of the victim&#8217;s vehicle, fell firmly within reasonable force&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;What the f***&#8217;, &#8216;go back, go back&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Delivering his reserved decision recently, Judge Crayton said police alleged that the complainant and three friends drove up Kay Rd, southeast of Te Awamutu, in his Hyundai Getz, to &#8220;look at some lasers in the night sky&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>However, after realising the road was a dead end, they turned around but then claimed they were chased by a car.<\/p>\n<p>As they got to the end of Kay Rd, the vehicle following them tried to &#8220;T-bone them&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The complainants then said one hour later, they returned to Kay Rd, now driving a yellow Toyota Surf owned by his father, having ditched the Hyundai Getz &#8220;for safety&#8221; reasons.<\/p>\n<p>In their evidence, that was because they were going to look for the person who had chased them, to apologise and assuage any &#8220;bad blood&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>However, in their short journey up Kay Rd, they realised they didn&#8217;t know which property to go to, and it happened, &#8220;completely by chance&#8221;, that they pulled into the driveway of De Boer, the judge said.<\/p>\n<p>It was then that the complainant claimed he was struck by a tractor &#8220;several times&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>He then claimed their vehicle was driven backwards, striking De Boer&#8217;s son&#8217;s vehicle, which was parked behind them in the driveway.<\/p>\n<p>De Boer then got out of his vehicle with a metal pole and tried to strike the complainant through the window &#8220;with force&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Fortunately, we are not left to rely on the evidence of the victim and the others because, bluntly, each witness&#8230; took refuge in &#8216;I can&#8217;t remember it was two years ago&#8217;,&#8221; the judge said, recalling the evidence.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That, of course, provided a significant impediment when counsel sought to test the consistency of their evidence.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That was because there were several videos from that night.<\/p>\n<p>Two were provided by the occupants inside the complainant&#8217;s car.<\/p>\n<p>The first showed a tractor, being driven by De Boer, pulling in front of them and some &#8220;minor contact&#8221; with the vehicle.<\/p>\n<p>De Boer lifted the tractor&#8217;s bucket and pointed it towards the complainant&#8217;s ute.<\/p>\n<p>The judge found that it didn&#8217;t appear to have any &#8220;major contact&#8221; and said it was used more to ensure the car couldn&#8217;t get away.<\/p>\n<p>The audio of the videos was also informative, the judge said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;What the f***&#8217; and &#8216;lock the doors&#8217;, &#8216;if he said anything, just say that he&#8217;s trying to ram us in the driveway&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That is quite informative.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Then, there&#8217;s a female voice saying, &#8216;go back, go back&#8217;. That is also informative.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The second video showed a &#8220;very angry&#8221; De Boer, pictured at the driver&#8217;s side window, holding a wooden pole and demanding the driver&#8217;s licence.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And he is not accepting what is being said to him.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That is unsurprising, and he said clearly, &#8216;give me your driver&#8217;s licence or I will smash your car&#8217;.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Judge Crayton found that it wasn&#8217;t possible to assault the driver as alleged.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I go further.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Had that occurred, I have absolutely no doubt that it would have been something said [to] the defendant by those in the vehicle.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The occupants were also heard saying, &#8220;we&#8217;re leaving, we&#8217;re leaving&#8221;, &#8220;we were looking at the lasers&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s said repeatedly, not &#8216;we came to apologise&#8217;,&#8221; the judge said.<\/p>\n<p>But De Boer had four CCTV cameras, equipped with sound, on his property, and it clearly depicted what happened.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The four unwanted visits&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The first visit was at 8.53pm.<\/p>\n<p>There were two vehicles appearing to do burnouts, horns sounding, voices and laughing, which was all causing &#8220;significant disruption and agitation&#8221; to De Boer&#8217;s dogs.<\/p>\n<p>The vehicles then left.<\/p>\n<p>The complainant denied that one of those vehicles was his, but Judge Crayton found otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>At 8.59pm, the complainant returned in his car.<\/p>\n<p>As he drove up De Boer&#8217;s approximately 100m long, slightly curved, tree-lined driveway, the honking of the horn could be heard, along with De Boer&#8217;s dog barking.<\/p>\n<p>The vehicle tried to reverse out at speed, but repeatedly stopped and started to navigate the driveway before accelerating away.<\/p>\n<p>De Boer&#8217;s son was so concerned that he followed it.<\/p>\n<p>At 9.07pm, the vehicle drove up to the property again.<\/p>\n<p>When it left, there was heavy acceleration, and then it waited, about 200m away.<\/p>\n<p>The victim&#8217;s son followed again, and the complainant&#8217;s car can be heard accelerating away.<\/p>\n<p>The car returned again at 9.32pm, with its horn tooting.<\/p>\n<p>It was this visit that the complainant suggested they had returned, looking for whom to apologise to.<\/p>\n<p>The vehicle was reversed into De Boer&#8217;s driveway, where it sat for a &#8220;significant time&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>By now, De Boer was feeding out his animals and travelled over to the vehicle from his paddock.<\/p>\n<p>What was shown on the CCTV images was very important.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There is no nice way to put it,&#8221; the judge said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It establishes that the complainant and the witnesses are not being truthful.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;He accepts he was angry, struck bonnet&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>What the group didn&#8217;t count on was De Boer approaching from the road.<\/p>\n<p>It was then that the confrontation took place.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This was not about an apology,&#8221; the judge said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Durk De Boer was, and is, of good character.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>De Boer testified that he wasn&#8217;t the sort of person to commit this type of crime and that it was actually his son who was concerned about the repeated visits by the group of young people.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;He&#8217;d taken a stick with him, and he was, he accepted, angry because they lied to him about why they were there &#8211; the lights.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;He accepts he may have hit the windscreen, the bonnet with his pole.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The judge found the son&#8217;s evidence &#8220;reliable, truthful and consistent&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Absolutely reasonable force&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Was there an assault?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;On my assessment, there was not,&#8221; the judge said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I accept the defendant&#8217;s account that he was seeking to ensure that the complainant&#8217;s vehicle didn&#8217;t leave.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I do not accept [that] there were repeated impacts with the tractor.<\/p>\n<p>Judge Crayton said the only person responsible for damaging the complainant&#8217;s car was himself.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Bluntly, as Morgan put to the witness, was why there was no complaint about this until the defendant made an insurance claim.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>That happened three weeks after the incident, when the complainant went to the police.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I do accept that the defendant was plainly, and understandably, very angry.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The defendant went to ensure that the [complainant] and his friends stopped trespassing on his property, and of course, he was entitled to use reasonable force to prevent trespass.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The judge said he was &#8220;absolutely satisfied that any threat, or minor striking of the victim&#8217;s vehicle, fell firmly within reasonable force&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>He hoped that the group had learned an important lesson.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That it is important to respect people&#8217;s property and their privacy.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I expect that this was quite a rude shock for the complainant and his friends.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"By Belinda Feek, Open Justice reporter After a series of burnouts, toots and taunts, a carload of young&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":408097,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[42,43,40,38,41,39],"class_list":["post-408096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headlines","tag-headlines","tag-news","tag-top-news","tag-top-stories","tag-topnews","tag-topstories"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/408096","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=408096"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/408096\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/408097"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=408096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=408096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=408096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}