{"id":433477,"date":"2026-05-18T14:31:35","date_gmt":"2026-05-18T14:31:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/433477\/"},"modified":"2026-05-18T14:31:35","modified_gmt":"2026-05-18T14:31:35","slug":"auckland-immigration-lawyer-ken-oh-censured-and-banned-from-practising-on-his-own-account-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/433477\/","title":{"rendered":"Auckland immigration lawyer Ken Oh censured and banned from practising on his own account"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-family:'Sohne',Arial,Sans-serif;display: flex;align-items: center;font-size: 14px;\" class=\"story-paragraph nzherald-paragraph\">First published on <a style=\"background: none !important;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"122px\" height=\"30px\" style=\"display: flex;background: none;\" alt=\"NZ Herald\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/nzherald-117bcaab72f04075ca4e3d3410ff591e0b001b26e2ec22af4bb2efaa4ad5ed42.png\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/4JOFI14_O3ORAJ24T5CGBFW4M4GYHKFHKQ_avif.jpeg\" width=\"1050\" height=\"590\" alt=\"The Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal has censured Ken Oh over his dealing with clients as part of a novel immigration package.\"\/><\/p>\n<p class=\"photo-captioned__information\">\nYong Keun (Ken) Oh<br \/>\nPhoto: Supplied \/ Open Justice\n<\/p>\n<p>A lawyer who overcharged immigrants tens of thousands of dollars to get them a visa and a job has been censured and banned from working without supervision.<\/p>\n<p>The Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal says Auckland lawyer Yong Keun (Ken) Oh&#8217;s attitude towards his clients was &#8220;gravely at odds&#8221; with the norms of the legal profession.<\/p>\n<p>Oh earlier admitted unsatisfactory conduct when he charged clients &#8220;grossly excessive&#8221; fees of between $26,000 and $77,000 for a package deal for a visa and a job offer to move to New Zealand.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of the client charged $77,000, the tribunal found a visa would typically cost $32,000.<\/p>\n<p>Oh also threatened his clients with financial penalties if they complained about him or left their jobs within two years &#8211; something he said would cost them $1000 for every month not worked.<\/p>\n<p>The tribunal said these conditions were not enforceable.<\/p>\n<p>Clients &#8216;got exactly what they contracted for&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The tribunal said Oh&#8217;s clients were fully informed of the cost at the outset and &#8220;got exactly what they contracted for&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>But it said that he placed his own interests and those of the employers above those of his &#8220;vulnerable&#8221; clients, who were from the Philippines or Sri Lanka, seeking jobs as chefs or waitresses, or in one case as a nurse.<\/p>\n<p>The nine complainants in the case have name suppression. All obtained a visa and a job.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We do not criticise [Oh&#8217;s] entrepreneurial zeal,&#8221; the tribunal said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;What concerns us is his passion to promote his scheme exposed a large blind spot in his professionalism.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The conduct shows little comprehension of a lawyer&#8217;s duty to advance the interests of the client,&#8221; the tribunal said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It introduces conflicts between interests of his clients with third parties [the employers].&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal says &#8216;we were not impressed&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The tribunal decision said Oh attempted to explain to it how the unenforceable terms threatening penalties were supposedly for the benefit of his clients.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We were not impressed,&#8221; it said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;He suggested that immigration law is special and that a lawyer&#8217;s relationship with a client is different where it comes to commercial aspects. We were not impressed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;At the conclusion of his oral evidence, we were shocked to have had it demonstrated how this experienced sole practitioner could have got these fundamentals so wrong.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The tribunal ordered Oh to reduce the fees he had charged to eight of the complainants by 20 percent.<\/p>\n<p>He has also been banned from practising law on his own account until authorised by the tribunal to do so.<\/p>\n<p>It said he was experienced and &#8220;technically competent&#8221; as a lawyer but lacked a fundamental understanding of the professional stance he should adopt.<\/p>\n<p>The tribunal allowed him to keep practising under the &#8220;structured oversight&#8221; of another lawyer, with which he could experience &#8220;sound examples&#8221; of professional lawyer-client relationships.<\/p>\n<p>Oh was also ordered to pay $68,000 to cover the disciplinary process&#8217; costs.<\/p>\n<p>The tribunal said its censure of Oh would remain permanently on his professional record.<\/p>\n<p>Attempts to reach Oh for comment were not immediately successful.<\/p>\n<p>Previous findings detailed<\/p>\n<p>The tribunal decision disclosed that a standards committee of the Law Society has made findings of unsatisfactory conduct against him twice in the past, before his current case.<\/p>\n<p>These findings related to the terms or clarity of his fees agreements.<\/p>\n<p>In 2018, he was fined $2000. In 2020, he was fined $3500.<\/p>\n<p>The website of Oh&#8217;s company, Kenton Chambers, was today still inviting applications from people wanting to relocate to New Zealand, with contact details for agents in Pakistan and Sri Lanka.<\/p>\n<p>* This story originally appeared in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/nz\/auckland-immigration-lawyer-ken-oh-censured-and-banned-from-practising-on-his-own-account\/7SJCXKWRXFFO3KXKHVTV26Y4PM\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">New Zealand Herald<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"First published on Yong Keun (Ken) Oh Photo: Supplied \/ Open Justice A lawyer who overcharged immigrants tens&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":433478,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[48,47,111,43,139,69,49,46,44,45],"class_list":["post-433477","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-new-zealand","tag-audio","tag-current-affairs","tag-new-zealand","tag-news","tag-newzealand","tag-nz","tag-podcasts","tag-public-radio","tag-radio-new-zealand","tag-rnz"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433477","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=433477"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433477\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/433478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=433477"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=433477"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=433477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}