The first complaint came on March 11, 2026, and was met with a Rowing NZ reply on March 20. The response informed the complainants their request to have the race investigated had been declined.<\/p>\n
A second request \u2013 by way of a 10-page submission \u2013 was sent to Rowing NZ on May 18.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe still believe the 1988 Maadi Cup Final race and other races at the same regatta were \u2018unfair\u2019 because Christ\u2019s College were the only school permitted to row with highly advantageous \u2018new technology\u2019 of lightweight carbon fibre oars,\u201d the second submission read.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt appears to us that you have not given the issues raised proper consideration.\u201d<\/p>\n
The complainants argued the Health and Safety at Work Act should protect competitors from harm, including the \u201congoing anxiety harm\u201d they said could flow from unfair racing and an inadequate protest regime.<\/p>\n
The 1988 Auckland Grammar Maadi Cup Crew.<\/p>\n
The complaint asks for the result to be overturned by way of either a disqualification or that Christ\u2019s College be \u201crelegated\u201d by the distance that it was advantaged in the 2000m race.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe video evidence we already provided proves that we lost the Maadi Cup final by just three-quarters of a length and were only overtaken in the last 180m of the race, when the fatigue from the considerable additional weight of our wooden oars would have logically had the most impact.\u201d <\/p>\n
The complainant suggests the advantage of the lighter oars would equate to three boat lengths for Christ\u2019s College. <\/p>\n
\u201cWe reached these conclusions applying the known facts, using maths and physics, artificial intelligence (AI) review, and common sense.\u201d<\/p>\n
They say that they were not in a position to dispute the result in 1988. <\/p>\n
\u201cAs a crew, overwhelmed with disappointment at the race\u2019s conclusion, as a photograph attached to this letter clearly shows, we were not actually aware of what happened until a number of years later, and we lacked access to all the science and relevant evidence that we can now find on the internet and via AI to make a credible complaint.\u201d <\/p>\n
Among Grammar\u2019s crew in 1988 was Hamish Carter \u2013 one of New Zealand\u2019s greatest and most decorated triathletes. Carter won gold at the 2004 Athens Olympics, ahead of compatriot Bevan Docherty. Carter is not part of the group protesting the 1988 result.<\/p>\n
Hamish Carter, who was part of the Auckland Grammar rowing team in 1988, and Bevan Docherty after winning gold and silver respectively at the 2004 Athens Olympics. Photo \/ Mark Mitchell<\/p>\n
The complainants also proposed three rule changes, saying they felt a \u201cclear moral obligation\u201d to prevent similar harm and ensure \u201cwhat actually occurred in the past should never have been allowed to happen\u201d.<\/p>\n
They want fair racing rules clarified so oars, skiffs and coxswains are weighed to ensure they meet minimum weights, protest avenues remain available to deter cheating, and new technology that gives rowers an unfair advantage is restricted in a similar way to cycling.<\/p>\n
Lake Ruataniwha hosted the 2026 Maadi Regatta and was also the sight of the 1988 contest. Photo \/ Rowing NZ<\/p>\n
Rowing NZ was asked to consider this proposal at its AGM held over the weekend. The national body told the Herald it was not discussed. <\/p>\n
The Herald has approached members of the Christ\u2019s College 1988 crew but has yet to receive a response. <\/p>\n
The complainants had also attempted to re-engage with the race winners but said they had only received one brief response thus far: \u201cI had to check the date on the email just to make sure it wasn\u2019t April 1\u201d.<\/p>\n
The complainants conclude by asking why Christ\u2019s College was \u201cknowingly allowed\u201d to compete with underweight equipment, why rules had not changed, and why there should be a time limit on protesting alleged \u201cbad faith\u201d conduct after years of \u201canxiety and frustration\u201d.<\/p>\n
Rowing NZ said it is still considering the complainants\u2019 second submission. <\/p>\n