Given the enormous amounts the council now forces us to pay in rates, it is more obvious than ever that ratepayers should be able to choose who makes decisions about that money.<\/p>\n
The tricky part for Watts now is defending having only gone halfway. He has only stripped voting rights from unelected members installed under one piece of law: the Local Government Act. But there are five laws in all that install various other members. Which means he hasn\u2019t touched the voting rights of mana whenua members in two of the most contentious examples: the Auckland Council and Ecan.<\/p>\n
Ecan he may be able to explain away because the entire body will be scrapped within two years when all regional councils are binned.<\/p>\n
Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown. Photo \/ Corey Fleming<\/p>\n
But the Auckland Council is not so easy. There are two unelected representatives who have full voting rights and have used them to help Wayne Brown win close votes he would otherwise have lost. In other words, without them the democratically elected part of the council would have reached a different conclusion.<\/p>\n
Watts\u2019 argument here is that he hasn\u2019t enough time before the election to fix all five laws. What he\u2019s done is easy because the Local Government Act<\/a> is already before Parliament for amendment. That is a fair argument.<\/p>\n But he should avoid the trap of thinking it gives him a chance to escape doing the final clean-up of all five laws because this issue is likely to crop up again. The strength of feeling on the Far North case suggests this winds people up. All it will take is one controversial call by one of the iwi representatives on one of these councils to make the news \u2013 or one vote screwed against the democratically elected councillors \u2013 and this could fire up again.<\/p>\n Because the principle is the same across all councils from the Far North down to the deep south. Democratic decision-making over vast sums of ratepayer money matters.<\/p>\n