![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/TOP-CPPI-PORTS.jpg\")
<\/p>\nThe Port of Philadelphia was the only U.S. port to rank among the world\u2019s top 50 container ports in the Container Port Performance Index (CPPI) 2025, jointly issued by the World Bank Group and S&P Global Market Intelligence.<\/p>\n
By Lori-Ann LaRocco \u2013 Now in its sixth edition, the annual report evaluated more than 400 global ports using data spanning 2020 to 2025. It highlights how extended vessel turnaround times\u2014often caused by congestion and shipping rerouting\u2014both reflect and exacerbate ongoing supply chain vulnerabilities.<\/p>\n
\u201cUnderstanding this two-way relationship is essential,\u201d said Bertrand De la Borde, Global Director for Transport and Logistics at the World Bank Group. \u201cPorts are not just passively exposed to external shocks; they also dynamically shape how those shocks are transmitted. They can either amplify disruptions or help contain them. Investing in port efficiency and digital management is not only beneficial to shipping lines\u2014it is a core requirement to build more resilient supply chains and reduce the impact of volatility on economies and communities.\u201d<\/p>\n
U.S. ports were eclipsed by leading ports in Asia, the Middle East, and parts of Europe.<\/p>\n
The list of U.S. ports by their 2025 CPPI ranking:<\/p>\n
Philadelphia \u2014 48<\/p>\n
Jacksonville (USJAX) \u2014 52<\/p>\n
Miami (USMIA) \u2014 75<\/p>\n
New Orleans (USMSY) \u2014 76<\/p>\n
Port Everglades (USPEF) \u2014 83<\/p>\n
Los Angeles \u2014 88<\/p>\n
Charleston \u2014 90<\/p>\n
New York & New Jersey (USNYC) \u2014 117<\/p>\n
Tampa Port (USTPA) \u2014 229<\/p>\n
Wilmington, N.C. (USILM) \u2014 276<\/p>\n
Port of Virginia (USNFF) \u2014 281<\/p>\n
Tacoma (USTIW) \u2014 384<\/p>\n
According to the report, North American ports, including those in the United States, continue to recover from earlier disruptions but still face challenges such as congestion, labor constraints, and hinterland bottlenecks.<\/p>\n
Some U.S. ports, including Los Angeles and Charleston, were among the top year-on-year improvers. Los Angeles, in particular, improved vessel turnaround times, accompanied by a pronounced easing of congestion and supply chain stress.<\/p>\n
In 2025, the global average CPPI score showed a slight deterioration relative to the 2024 benchmark, indicating longer average vessel time in port.<\/p>\n
The CPPI shows that global port efficiency remains under pressure from geopolitical instability, shipping network disruptions, extreme weather events, and persistent market volatility.<\/p>\n
Top-Performing Ports<\/p>\n
Ports in Asia and the Middle East dominated the top five rankings.<\/p>\n
According to the report, these ports benefited from higher levels of investment, export-oriented trade, and more advanced digital systems. Those advantages contributed to stronger reliability scores, shorter vessel turnaround times, greater digitalization, and stronger operational coordination.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The authors of the report said this year\u2019s edition is \u201cparticularly timely\u201d given the supply chain shock caused by the Iran war.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn 2026, disruption in the Strait of Hormuz reduced shipping flows to a trickle, reinforcing the risk of sudden schedule dislocation and arrival compression. As carriers re-sequence networks to bypass these zones, congestion often shifts to \u2018relief\u2019 nodes, which can quickly become overwhelmed by the \u2018clumping\u2019 or synchronized arrival of diverted vessels.\u201d<\/p>\n
The authors added that the time vessels spend in port has become even more central to the functioning and resilience of international trade.<\/p>\n
\u201cEfficient ports are not only a source of competitiveness but also a key determinant of how well supply chains absorb and recover from disruptions.\u201d<\/p>\n
Developed Countries vs. Lower-Income Countries<\/p>\n
The findings showed that in 2025, ports in upper-middle-income and high-income economies recorded higher average CPPI scores than ports in lower-middle-income and low-income economies. However, ports in upper-middle-income economies slightly outperformed those in high-income economies on average.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/gcaptain.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/WORLD-BANK-REGION-800x610.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
This trend has been observed in previous editions of the CPPI.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis underlines that income level alone does not mechanically determine port performance; structure, incentives, and exposure to shocks matter.\u201d<\/p>\n
The report strongly recommended digital tools that improve planning and sequencing to help ports shift from reactive to anticipatory operations.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe findings reinforce that ports are critical nodes in the global supply chain,\u201d said Turloch Mooney, Head of Port Intelligence & Analytics at S&P Global Market Intelligence. \u201cBy focusing on both improving port efficiency and understanding their active role in supply chain dynamics, stakeholders can better prepare for future shocks and support sustainable trade growth.\u201d<\/p>\n
Editorial Standards<\/a> \u00b7 Corrections<\/a> \u00b7 About gCaptain<\/a><\/p>\n \t\t Sign up for gCaptain\u2019s newsletter and never miss an update<\/p>\n \u2014 trusted by our 105,236 members<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Port of Philadelphia was the only U.S. port to rank among the world\u2019s top 50 container ports…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":472936,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[138,219,111,139,69,29272,238729],"class_list":["post-472935","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-economy","tag-business","tag-economy","tag-new-zealand","tag-newzealand","tag-nz","tag-ports","tag-u-s-ports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472935","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=472935"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472935\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/472936"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=472935"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=472935"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=472935"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"logo\"\/](\"https:\/\/gcaptain.com\/wp-content\/themes\/gCaptain-Theme\/assets\/images\/gcaptain-new-gray-logo.svg\"){kind=logo}
\n\t\tSubscribe for Daily Maritime Insights<\/p>\n