{"id":474592,"date":"2026-06-13T00:45:14","date_gmt":"2026-06-13T00:45:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/474592\/"},"modified":"2026-06-13T00:45:14","modified_gmt":"2026-06-13T00:45:14","slug":"before-your-401k-rmds-start-at-73-execute-this-1-4-million-tax-saving-move-in-your-60s","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/474592\/","title":{"rendered":"Before Your 401(k) RMDs Start at 73, Execute This $1.4 Million Tax-Saving Move in Your 60s"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t<img width=\"1366\" height=\"768\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/imageForEntry7-xfS.jpg\" class=\"w-full lg:rounded-lg wp-post-image\" alt=\"Before Your 401(k) RMDs Start at 73, Execute This $1.4 Million Tax-Saving Move in Your 60s\" loading=\"eager\" decoding=\"async\" fetchpriority=\"high\"\/>\t<\/p>\n<p>\u00a9 kate_sept2004 \/ E+ via Getty Images<\/p>\n<p>A 65-year-old who just retired with $1.4 million in a traditional 401(k) and no plans to touch it until age 73 has a problem most pre-retirees miss. The eight years between retiring and the first <a title=\"This Is Exactly How the IRS Determines Your RMD\" href=\"https:\/\/247wallst.com\/personal-finance\/2025\/03\/06\/this-is-exactly-how-the-irs-determines-your-rmd\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">required minimum distribution<\/a> are the cheapest tax years of the rest of their life. Once RMDs start, the IRS, Medicare, and Social Security all begin pulling at the same dollar.<\/p>\n<p>The fix is unglamorous: a partial <a title=\"How Senior Law Firm Partners Are Building a Retirement With No Tax Bill\" href=\"https:\/\/247wallst.com\/investing\/2026\/03\/31\/how-senior-law-firm-partners-are-building-a-retirement-with-no-tax-bill\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Roth conversion strategy<\/a> executed in the 60s, sized to fill up the lower tax brackets without spilling into <a title=\"Why Some Retirees Pay $689.90 a Month for Medicare While Others Pay $202.90\" href=\"https:\/\/247wallst.com\/investing\/2026\/02\/24\/why-some-retirees-pay-689-90-a-month-for-medicare-while-others-pay-202-90\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">IRMAA<\/a> territory. Done right, it can shave six figures off the lifetime tax bill for portfolios in the $1 million to $2.5 million range.<\/p>\n<p>The RMD Math That Triggers Everything<\/p>\n<p>The first required distribution at age 73 uses a divisor of roughly 26.5 from the IRS Uniform Lifetime Table. On a $1.4 million traditional 401(k), that is about $52,800 in forced ordinary income in year one, before a single Social Security or pension dollar hits the return.<\/p>\n<p>Layer on Social Security. The provisional income formula makes up to 85% of benefits taxable once combined income clears roughly $44,000 for a married couple. A $52,800 RMD plus $50,000 in joint Social Security clears that line easily, and the newly taxable benefits stack on top of the RMD to push the household deeper into the 22% or 24% bracket.<\/p>\n<p>Then comes IRMAA. Medicare Part B and Part D surcharges run on a two-year lookback, and a couple whose modified adjusted gross income clears the first tier (around $212,000 for joint filers in recent guidance) pays an added premium per spouse, per month. Cross a higher tier and the surcharge can run $300 to $400+ per person monthly. A reader who casually executes a $200,000 Roth conversion at 71 may not realize they just bought an IRMAA bill that lands at 73.<\/p>\n<p>Why Your 60s Are the Window<\/p>\n<p>The 2026 brackets give a retired couple breathing room a 73-year-old never sees again. The 22% bracket runs to $211,400 for married couples filing jointly, and the standard deduction is $32,200. A couple with no earned income and Social Security delayed to 70 can convert roughly $130,000 a year from traditional to Roth and stay entirely inside the 22% bracket.<\/p>\n<p>Over six years, that is around $780,000 lifted out of the future RMD base. By age 73, the remaining traditional balance produces a much smaller forced distribution, the Roth balance grows tax-free with no RMD during the owner\u2019s lifetime, and the IRMAA dial stays down.<\/p>\n<p>The macro backdrop favors acting now. The 10-year Treasury sits near 4.6% and the Fed funds upper bound is near 3.8%, both signaling that the current bracket structure under the One Big Beautiful Bill is the law for the foreseeable future. Paying 22% today on a known conversion amount beats paying an effective 32% to 40% later on stacked RMDs, taxable Social Security, and IRMAA premiums.<\/p>\n<p>Workers still earning above $150,000 in W-2 wages have a built-in conversion already running. Under <a title=\"The 2026 Rule Change That Forces Workers Earning Over $145,000 Into Roth Catch-Up Contributions\" href=\"https:\/\/247wallst.com\/personal-finance\/2026\/04\/09\/the-2026-rule-change-that-forces-workers-earning-over-145000-into-roth-catch-up-contributions\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">SECURE 2.0<\/a>, every catch-up dollar ($8,000 for ages 50 to 59 or $11,250 for ages 60 to 63) now must go to the Roth side of the 401(k). High earners should max it.<\/p>\n<p>Three Moves to Make This Year<\/p>\n<p>Run a Roth conversion ladder with your CPA in November, when you know your year-end numbers. Target the top of the 22% bracket ($211,400 in taxable income for joint filers), and convert in December once the math is locked.<br \/>\nMind the IRMAA two-year lookback. A conversion completed in 2026 hits Medicare premiums in 2028. If either spouse turns 65 in 2027 or 2028, throttle conversions accordingly or accept the surcharge as a known cost.<br \/>\nIf you are still working and earned over $150,000 in 2025, confirm your 401(k) offers a Roth bucket and route every catch-up dollar there. No Roth option in the plan means no catch-up contributions allowed.<\/p>\n<p>Run this playbook in your 60s and you arrive at 73 with a smaller RMD, a lower Medicare bill, and most of your Social Security check intact. Wait, and the cascade is already in motion when the first 1099-R hits the mailbox.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u00a9 kate_sept2004 \/ E+ via Getty Images A 65-year-old who just retired with $1.4 million in a traditional&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":474593,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[138,246,111,139,69,244,245],"class_list":["post-474592","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-personal-finance","tag-business","tag-finance","tag-new-zealand","tag-newzealand","tag-nz","tag-personal-finance","tag-personalfinance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=474592"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474592\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/474593"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=474592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=474592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=474592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}