$200 rent rise forces student into his car<\/a><\/p>\nMr Corby had applied for an investment loan to buy a South Hedland property in WA, for about $305,000 with a 10 per cent deposit.<\/p>\n
![\"\"\/](\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg)
<\/p>\n
Mr Corby had hoped to buy this three-bedroom renovator for $305,000 but the banks had other ideas. Source: Realestate.com.au<\/p>\n
On paper, he believed it was a strong deal.<\/p>\n
Comparable homes next door and on the same street had reportedly sold for about $600,000 to $650,000, and his own feasibility assessment suggested he could make between $70,000 and $90,000 by renovating and flipping the property.<\/p>\n
But despite the apparent upside, multiple lenders reportedly refused to finance it.<\/p>\n
\u201cTo my surprise, the loan was declined. The deal stacked up on paper, but my broker approached multiple lenders and they all came back with a hard no,\u201d Mr Corby said.<\/p>\n
\u201cMy income and serviceability weren\u2019t the issue. My broker said that lenders considered the postcode too risky, with the area\u2019s crime rate, and particularly the rate of property crime and burglary, contributing to their concerns.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Mr Corby was surprised to receive this email from his broker. Picture: Supplied<\/p>\n
The shock for Mr Corby was not just the rejection, but the reason behind it.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt caught me off guard. When you hear about restricted or \u2018no-go\u2019 postcodes, you might picture a tiny, remote town,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cSouth Hedland has a decent population size, established amenities, government services and a major resources sector. The property wasn\u2019t isolated either and was close to a Woolworths.<\/p>\n
\u201cEven as an experienced investor, I learned that financeability needs to form part of the due diligence before committing to a property.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou can assess the purchase price, comparable sales, renovation costs and potential profit, but lenders have internal location-risk data and postcode policies that investors often can\u2019t see.\u201d<\/p>\n
His broker, Daniel Uzelac from Lendier Finance, said banks often maintain confidential internal blacklists restricting loans in high-risk postcodes, with crime emerging as a major factor in some cases.<\/p>\n
\u201cBanks won\u2019t tell you specifically that it\u2019s due to X, Y, Z but I can tell you examples from private lenders, because they are more transparent, so when some of these projects pop up, it is purely based on that the crime\u2019s too much in that area and the risk of getting that property repaired and not vandalised again is very high,\u201d Mr Uzelac said.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Charles Corby is a seasoned investor with an appetite for turning renovators and derelict homes into rental properties. Picture: Mike Dugdale<\/p>\n
In other words, even if a borrower can comfortably repay the mortgage, the bank may still walk away if it believes the property itself is a liability.<\/p>\n
Money.com.au property expert Nick Burgess said lenders were not usually assessing crime in isolation, but as part of a broader risk profile around the property and suburb.<\/p>\n
\u201cLenders are concerned with resale marketability and price stability, so whether they could sell the property quickly and recover the money owed if needed,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cCrime usually isn\u2019t assessed on its own, but it does form part of the broader risk assessment, like flood or bushfire risk.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor example, a valuer may include negative commentary about the location, like crime or local amenity concerns, in their valuation report. This could prompt a lender to decline the application or reduce the maximum LVR on a case-by-case basis.\u201d<\/p>\n
That backs up what brokers are seeing on the ground: a suburb does not necessarily need to be formally black-listed for a deal to unravel. <\/p>\n
The hidden report killing deals<\/p>\n
Sometimes all it takes is a cautious valuation report flagging crime concerns, weaker resale prospects or doubts about local demand.<\/p>\n
If the lender ever had to repossess and sell the property, repeated vandalism, break-ins, weak buyer demand and higher repair bills could all reduce the bank\u2019s chances of recovering its money.<\/p>\n
Mr Uzelac said valuers were increasingly becoming the silent deal killers.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey are very black and white with what they see, and the valuer is what kills most of these deals anyway these days,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe valuer will come out and say, \u2018look, the property needs structural repairs\u2019, but in reality it doesn\u2019t. And the reason they say that is because they\u2019ve seen some cracks, and that alone can completely destroy the deal.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut then also, they\u2019ll note that down the street, there\u2019ve been break ins.\u201d<\/p>\n
He said many of the reports lenders rely on are kept tightly under wraps, leaving borrowers and investors with little visibility over whether a postcode has effectively been marked as untouchable.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Banks often have major concerns about lending money to investors looking to buy homes in high-risk areas.<\/p>\n
That means some buyers can spend weeks chasing a property, paying for due diligence and running the numbers, only to discover too late that the suburb itself is the problem.<\/p>\n
Mr Uzelac said investors should absolutely be checking local crime rates before buying, especially in regional markets where lending appetite can vary wildly from one town to the next.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s probably a good idea,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cAll I can say is definitely, definitely lenders are not willing to push certain barriers in some of these areas, and it\u2019s so hard to pick them because some regional towns are perfectly fine, while others are not.\u201d<\/p>\n
He said rooming accommodation was a perfect example of how crime can wreck an investment.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf you look at Rooming, it\u2019s actually not successful everywhere and that\u2019s purely based on crime,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf I had an investment property there and it says 48 per cent of that whole circle is break in, what would you think as an investor? Would you own a property where you\u2019ll be liable for repairs?\u201d<\/p>\n
Investors already heading for the exits<\/p>\n
The bigger problem is what this could mean for the national housing picture.<\/p>\n
Australia is already battling a brutal housing shortage, soaring rents and collapsing affordability. <\/p>\n
If banks are now quietly shutting investors out of selected suburbs and regional centres, that could further choke the supply of rental housing in places that may already be doing it tough.<\/p>\n
And there are already signs investors are retreating.<\/p>\n
Updated independent modelling released by Master Builders Australia, the Housing Industry Association, the Property Council of Australia and the Real Estate Institute of Australia <\/a>found the federal budget\u2019s housing tax reforms could wipe 10,700 homes from the pipeline, push rents higher and cost thousands of jobs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Source: Qaive and Tulipwood estimates<\/p>\n
Fresh figures from the Property Investors Professionals of Australia paint an equally grim picture.<\/p>\n
According to the data, 18.3 per cent of investors sold at least one property in the year to August, marking the third straight annual rise.<\/p>\n
Of those sellers, 51.6 per cent sold to an owner-occupier, effectively removing those homes from the rental market.<\/p>\n
Another 9.7 per cent said they had already withdrawn a property from the long-term rental pool, while 82 per cent expected rental supply in their area to fall.<\/p>\n
\u201cLast year, investors told us they would walk away if these reforms became law,\u201d PIPA chair Cate Bakos said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis year\u2019s survey is the first national read by PIPA since the changes were legislated, and it shows a lot of them are doing exactly that.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Aussie banks are quietly black-listing whole suburbs from home loans, with buyers blindsided by secret postcode bans that…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":606404,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[138,111,139,69],"class_list":["post-606403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","tag-business","tag-new-zealand","tag-newzealand","tag-nz"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=606403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/606403\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/606404"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=606403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=606403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=606403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}