The other day I went on the Monitoring the Situation livestream, and we talked about the history of San Francisco tech culture:<\/p>\n
I\u2019ve never actually worked in the tech industry, but I\u2019ve lived on and off in the Bay Area for a quarter of a century now \u2014 including the last 10 years in San Francisco itself \u2014 and I\u2019ve spent a lot of that time hanging out with people who work in or around the tech industry. Throughout much of that time, I was also reading some the same source materials that inspired lots of tech people \u2014 science fiction, futurist websites and books, nerdy forums and blogs, and so on. <\/p>\n
Over that time, I\u2019ve watched more and more people start to care about all this. Back in the early 2000s, as far as I could tell, pretty much nobody in the world cared about what some dorky hoodie-wearing computer programmers were up to on a Saturday night in SF. Fast forward 25 years, and the President of the United States is gathering opposition research on SF techie subcultures<\/a>:<\/p>\n President Trump’s allies are targeting Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei as the face of AI “doomerism” and a founding father of the effective altruism movement that’s come under increasing political fire\u2026Trump surrogates see Amodei as an easy foil because of his politics and focus on AI safety, sources told Axios\u2026<\/p>\n A memo<\/a> began circulating within the White House this week that seeks to paint effective altruism as a fringe, cultish collective out of touch with mainstream America. The memo, obtained by Axios, places Amodei at the foundation of the movement\u2026Effective altruism \u201cbuilt the AI-doom pipeline,\u201d states the memo, which was penned by a Trump political adviser\u2026Critics of the movement, which has ties to the AI research community, have called out its obsession with AI safety, animal welfare (including musings on shrimp consciousness<\/a>) and other values they deem far from the U.S. mainstream\u2026<\/p>\n The document lists a veritable parade of horribles for the average conservative mind: abortion, veganism, devaluing human life by overvaluing animals or granting “digital minds” civil rights-like protections.<\/p>\n If you could go back in time and tell the 2001 version of me that the President\u2019s allies are talking on national news about shrimp consciousness, I would have laughed out loud. (Until you told me who the President was, of course.) Not only that, but you have the New York Post talking about Effective Altruists\u2019 sex lives<\/a>, and op-eds debating EA philosophy in top blogs<\/a> and the Washington Post<\/a>. <\/p>\n Ladies and gentlemen, it really happened. The nerds took over the world. We have arrived.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve never been an Effective Altruist, of course, and I\u2019ve only hung out a little bit in those circles. But in fact, EA is only one corner of the tech culture, and its influence on the AI safety discussion is probably a lot less than people think. In fact, the people talking about EA in the White House and in the news aren\u2019t even really identifying the right group of people \u2014 the AI safety obsessives that the White House is taking aim at are the Rationalists, who are descended from a group of 1990s futurists called the Extropians. EA is a largely separate philosophical movement that appeals to some of the Rationalists, has some overlapping social circles, and jumped into the AI safety discussion later on after the basic ideas were all in place. <\/p>\n But anyway, that whole intellectual history is a story for another day (or you can just go ask AI). Today what I wanted to do is to give a brief anthropological history of the tech culture in San Francisco since the turn of the century, from my own quasi-outsider\u2019s perspective. There have been four distinct eras over that time period:<\/p>\n The Rebel Era (2001-2012)<\/p>\n The Corporate Era (2012-2019)<\/p>\n The Interregnum (2020-2022)<\/p>\n The AI Era (2022-present)<\/p>\n But let\u2019s start with some background. <\/p>\n SF tech culture is the modern descendant of a very long lineage. It\u2019s a branch off of the tree of computer science culture, which is closely intermingled with electrical engineering culture, and which are both branches off of the great broad trunk of science and technology culture more generally. But it\u2019s important to realize that what became SF tech culture didn\u2019t start in San Francisco \u2014 it started down on the peninsula to the south. <\/p>\n The modern tech industry began in the suburban towns around Stanford University \u2014 Menlo Park, Palo Alto, Cupertino, Sunnyvale, and so on. This had been a hub of the old electric equipment industry from World War 2 onward, and so William Shockley chose Mountain View to start the first semiconductor company in 1955. Fairchild broke off from Shockley, and Intel broke off from Fairchild. The whole area became a hub of semiconductor manufacturing in the 60s and 70s, then computer companies (Apple was founded in 1976 in Cupertino), then software companies like Oracle and Adobe. For a long time, Sand Hill Road in Palo Alto was the locus of the venture capital industry.<\/p>\n Today we use \u201cSilicon Valley\u201d to refer to the IT industry in general, but originally it meant the area around Menlo Park and Palo Alto. I wasn\u2019t there to see this era, but a few good resources to learn about both the economics and the culture are:<\/p>\n The book Regional Advantage<\/a>, by Annalee Saxenian, which documents how and why Silicon Valley became America\u2019s top tech cluster<\/p>\n The documentary General Magic<\/a>, which chronicles a failed but highly influential smartphone startup in the 90s<\/p>\n The movie Office Space and the book Microserfs, which both satirize the stultifying experience of working for a big tech company in the 90s<\/p>\n The book From Counterculture to Cyberculture<\/a>, which chronicles the techno-hippie movement that grew up around the emerging computer industry<\/p>\n San Francisco began as a marginal bit player in the whole tech ecosystem. It was a place that some tech people would come up to party and network, especially during the dotcom era when a lot of money (at least, for those days) was splashing around. <\/p>\n But it did have a media industry, and in the 1990s, some people who worked in publishing, advertising, and other media started trying to get in on the internet gold rush. A few engineers and entrepreneurs who didn\u2019t want to live in the boring suburban environment of Silicon Valley moved to SF to make tech media and web startups. Tony Hsieh\u2019s autobiography, Delivering Happiness<\/a>, tells the story of how he founded LinkExchange in San Francisco, while getting involved in the rave scene. At the same time, SF became a locus of tech media \u2014 Wired was founded there in 1993.<\/p>\n That, I think, was really the start of modern San Francisco tech culture as we know it. It bled directly into the first era of tech culture that I witnessed first-hand \u2014 the Rebel Era of the 2000s. <\/p>\n In 2003, when people said \u201cSilicon Valley\u201d, they still meant the Peninsula. Google began there, Apple made its big comeback there, and when Facebook moved out west in 2004, this is where it went. Sand Hill Road was still the epicenter of tech \u2014 throughout the 2000s, people would still use \u201cwalk down Sand Hill Road\u201d as a synonym for trying to get VC funding. If you wanted to make money in tech in the 2000s \u2014 and everyone knew there was still a lot of money to be made, despite the dotcom bust \u2014 you went to the Peninsula. <\/p>\n This was the land of office parks, cute but sterile shopping villages, overpriced single-family homes, big tracts of open space, Patagonia vests, and bland restaurants serving pancake brunch. It was where you went to tutor kids for $50 an hour if you were a Stanford student who needed cash. It was also the land of starched button-down shirts, cubicles, and pointy-haired bosses who didn\u2019t quite know what their engineers were up to. It was not a place to meet girls, go to parties, do drugs, wear grungy clothes, or dream big dreams about freeing society from the clutches of authority and tradition. <\/p>\n If you went up to SF to start a company in the 2000s instead of going down to the Peninsula like everyone else, it usually meant you were something of a rebel. A whole alternative tech culture grew up in the city \u2014 more laid-back, more politically liberal, less obviously focused on money and \u201csuccess\u201d and more focused on building fun products. Twitter was the most famous product of this time period \u2014 Evan Williams\u2019s life project was to give a voice to the voiceless, and Jack Dorsey was a scruffy hippie kid who went to raves. <\/p>\n This is the time period when Burning Man \u2014 which had pretty much just been a punk art festival in the 90s \u2014 became a techie thing. Fire tornadoes and slapping LEDs on everything still felt like art. Everyone went to the Oakland warehouses to party, and for a brief shining moment, techies and artists got along. Psychedelic drugs were almost a matter of course \u2014 after all, Steve Jobs had done them, and Jobs was the great tech hero of that decade. Tech became more communal \u2014 instead of hacking together the next big thing in your parents\u2019 garage or in a cubicle, you might go hang out and do it at Noisebridge in the Mission, surrounded by other techno-hippie hacker types like yourself. <\/p>\n There was an ideological side to all this, too. There was a real belief \u2014 carried over from the 90s, but still strong \u2014 that the internet was going to liberate humanity. The tech rebels of the 2000s believed that social hierarchies were based on information control, and that if they simply broke that control, the hierarchies would be overturned. The information wanted to be free! <\/p>\n