\tDenver, CO \u2014 <\/p>\n
According to a CBS News report<\/a>, former congressman Greg Lopez \u2013 alongside livestock industry groups \u2013 sent a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service claiming that Colorado\u2019s plan to reintroduce gray wolves from Canada would violate a federal rule. Earthjustice, Western Environmental Law Center, and Defenders of Wildlife \u2013 legal organizations that successfully defended the reintroduction effort in court from a 2023 challenge and have extensively reviewed the rule \u2013 unequivocally state that the congressman\u2019s claim is incorrect and that Colorado has the flexibility to source gray wolves from Canada as needed.<\/p>\n The rule in question<\/a>, issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act, governs post-release management of wolves in Colorado. While the rule\u2019s preamble states that \u201cthe preferred donor population\u201d for the reintroduction of gray wolves to Colorado is the delisted northern Rocky Mountain (NRM) population, which includes wolves from Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and portions of Oregon, Washington, and Utah, it does not provide that the NRM population is the only source available. Nor could it, as the rule addresses wolf management and applies only in Colorado, so wolf capture activities elsewhere fall outside the rule\u2019s legal scope.<\/p>\n Furthermore, the environmental impact statement issued with the rule expressly notes that wolves can be sourced elsewhere as needed: \u201cif donor wolves from the western United States are not available, another possible source of gray wolves for the Colorado reintroduction may be the wolf population in the western Great Lakes states of Michigan, Minnesota, or Wisconsin.\u201d While the document does not expressly mention Canada, it plainly recognizes that wolves can come from locations other than the NRM population. Indeed, Colorado acquired wolves from British Columbia for releases conducted last winter, without objection from USFWS.<\/p>\n The legal organizations view the claim of illegality to be nothing more than the latest misguided attempt to derail the voter-mandated reintroduction of gray wolves in Colorado. In August, a Colorado anti-wolf ballot measure initiative failed to gather enough signatures<\/a> to move forward. The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission rejected a separate livestock industry petition<\/a> to pause the reintroduction in early 2025. Conservation groups also successfully intervened<\/a> in defense of reintroduction in late 2023 with a District Court judge denying a request by the livestock industry to stop wolf releases.<\/p>\n \u201cThe state of Colorado is on solid legal footing to continue its wolf reintroductions, including by releasing wolves from Canada as needed,\u201d said Thomas Delehanty, senior attorney with Earthjustice\u2019s Rocky Mountain Office. \u201cThe 10(j) rule does not mandate that Colorado\u2019s wolves come from specific states, period. Congressman Lopez and the livestock industry are simply wrong in suggesting otherwise, and we\u2019d all be wise to see their effort for what it is: another thinly veiled attempt to throw sand in the gears of a democratic process that they lost.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cOur political leaders should not be spreading baseless claims of illegality at the behest of special interests unhappy with Colorado\u2019s admirable effort to restore gray wolves to the state\u2019s natural ecosystem in accordance with the majority of the state\u2019s voters,\u201d said Kelly Nokes, an attorney with the Western Environmental Law Center\u2019s Colorado office. \u201cWolves are making a remarkable \u2013 and valuable \u2013 comeback, despite being undermined by political ploys such as this. We will continue to defend the reintroduction effort in the face of such illegitimate legal threats.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThe 10j rule is about post-release wolf management, it does not dictate where Colorado can source gray wolves from,\u201d said Lisa Saltzburg, senior attorney at Defenders of Wildlife. \u201cThese claims are twisting language that is not even part of the rule itself out of context. It\u2019s so disappointing to see them make headlines. Coloradans should be proud of their state\u2019s leadership in conservation and coexistence, and the wolf reintroduction program illustrates those values.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Denver, CO \u2014 According to a CBS News report, former congressman Greg Lopez \u2013 alongside livestock industry groups…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":95214,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[111,139,69,147,406],"class_list":["post-95213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-wildlife","tag-new-zealand","tag-newzealand","tag-nz","tag-science","tag-wildlife"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95213\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/95214"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}