This article is an on-site version of our Moral Money newsletter. Premium subscribers can sign up here to get the newsletter delivered twice a week. Standard subscribers can upgrade to Premium here, or explore all FT newsletters.
Visit our Moral Money hub for all the latest ESG news, opinion and analysis from around the FT
Welcome back.
We all stand to gain from the survival of the world’s tropical forests, with their powerful stabilising effect on the climate. Is there a way of mobilising international finance at sufficient scale to halt their ongoing destruction?
Brazil’s government insists that there is. And with just two months to go until the launch of its proposed global forest fund at the COP30 climate summit, we’ll soon find out whether it has a chance of success.
CLIMATE FINANCEMaking forest protection pay
Five years ago, during one of Brazil’s worst periods of rainforest destruction, I followed a plume of smoke in the jungle near Boca do Acre, deep in the Amazon region. It led me to a local man named Ezio, who was in the process of burning a large swath of rainforest for cattle pasture. “In this region, there’s no other form of income,” he told me.
The problem then, according to Ezio — and many experts on deforestation — is largely a simple one of economic incentives. There is money to be made from destroying rainforests but, all too often, none to be made from conserving them.
Brazil wants to use its presidency of November’s COP30 summit to change that, through a proposed $125bn international fund it has dubbed the Tropical Forests Forever Facility.
Initially floated by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in 2023, the plan is to induce wealthy countries to contribute financially to the preservation of tropical forests that, by absorbing huge amounts of carbon, benefit the whole planet.
“It has always been this idea of: how do we mobilise funding to come at least close to the true value of forests to the world?” said André Aquino, head of the economic and environmental advisory office at the Brazilian environment ministry.
Crucially, the proposed fund would not rely on donations. Instead it would be financed entirely by interest-bearing debt. By leveraging public money to raise larger amounts from commercial investors, it would become the world’s biggest “blended finance” vehicle if it can get anywhere close to its target size. Is that a realistic prospect?
The plan
The fund would borrow an initial amount of capital from “sponsors,” including wealthy nations and potentially other sources, such as foundations. This 40-year debt would have a low interest rate matching US Treasury yields. The fund would aim to issue $25bn of this debt within its first few years of operation.
The sponsors would agree to a junior position in the debt structure, meaning they would take the first hit from any losses. Brazil reckons this would enable the fund to issue a much larger amount of senior debt — the target is $100bn — to pension funds and other commercial investors.
The fund would invest in emerging market sovereign and corporate bonds, earning a higher yield than its cost of capital. That should mean that, after servicing its interest payments, it would have money left over — roughly $4bn per year, according to the plan — to fund forest conservation.
A diagram of the proposed fund’s financial structure
How will that money be distributed? The latest concept document has a list of 74 developing countries with more than 1bn hectares of tropical forests between them, from Argentina to Kenya to Vietnam. But they’d only be eligible for payments if they have an annual deforestation rate of less than 0.5 per cent (this will be monitored through satellite imaging). Those that qualify will receive a fixed amount — perhaps $4 — for every hectare of forest they hold. This payout will be reduced at a punitive rate for every hectare that’s destroyed.
Countries will be asked to report on how they use the funds, and must ensure that at least a fifth goes to local communities and indigenous peoples. The hope is that, if governments have a real financial incentive to reduce deforestation, they will in turn alter the incentives for people on the ground. The expected income for Brazil, at more than $1bn, would be more than triple the environment ministry’s current annual budget, Aquino said.
Rubens Suruí, chief of the Paiter-Suruí tribe in Brazil’s Amazon region, in a section of his people’s reserve that has been deforested and turned into pasture by a local cattle rancher © Simon Mundy
Rafael Dubeux, a finance ministry official involved with the plan, argued that this interest-bearing model has more chance of attracting serious sums from rich-world governments than a scheme reliant on donations. Major economies across much of the developed world have slashed their foreign aid budgets over the past year.
A group of six wealthy nations — France, Germany, Norway, the UK, the United Arab Emirates and (before Donald Trump took office) the US — have been involved in consultations on the scheme. At last year’s COP29 summit, rich nations agreed to “take the lead” in mobilising $300bn a year in climate finance for developing countries. “Despite the constrained budgets, most of those countries still want to keep engaged in that agenda,” Dubeux told me.
The risks
But risks to the scheme abound. Lula is set to announce a Brazilian contribution to the new fund later this month. Will other nations follow — and will they provide the kind of sums Brazil is hoping for, or something on the far more modest scale of the amounts committed to the UN fund for climate loss and damage?
Even if rich-world governments prove enthusiastic, will private-sector investors follow suit? With the junior debt investors agreeing to take the first hit from any losses, the fund could offer commercial investors a low-risk investment that “would attract your regular Danish pension fund”, argued Aquino.
This claim is supported by rigorous modelling and analysis of historical bond market performance, said Christopher Egerton-Warburton, founding partner of Lion’s Head Global Partners and a former Goldman Sachs banker, who worked on structuring the proposal.
Private-sector interest will hinge largely on what verdict the credit rating agencies reach on the new fund. Fitch is currently undertaking an initial review of the concept, but full rating decisions will follow only as the fund takes shape and starts preparing bond issuances.
Then there’s the Trump risk. A key part of the plan is that the new fund should be administered by the World Bank — an institution “viewed as a financially very stable pair of hands, and the market values that”, said Egerton-Warburton. The World Bank has been engaging in talks on the idea, and Brazil is hoping for a formal commitment soon. But as the climate-sceptic Trump government leans on the World Bank to align with its policy priorities, the risk of cold feet can’t be dismissed.
Still, like the carbon market integration idea I discussed on Wednesday, this is an example of fresh, innovative financial thinking around the climate challenge at a time when it’s badly needed. Over the past two months the scheme has received formal endorsements from the BRICS nations and from the eight nations that share the Amazon rainforest.
“This is a chance to shift the forest economy,” said Aquino, “to one where the actors that protect the forests significantly benefit from it.”
Smart reads
Divestment pushback The US state department has said it is “very troubled” by the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund’s decision to divest from construction equipment maker Caterpillar. It said the fund’s move “appears to be based on illegitimate claims” about the use of Caterpillar’s machinery to destroy Palestinian properties.
C-suite expansion How can companies reassure customers about their ethical digital practices, amid concerns about data protection and responsible use of artificial intelligence? Enter the chief trust officer.
Heads down “Fealty and silence is the new norm” in corporate America, writes Gillian Tett.
Recommended newsletters for you
The Climate Graphic: Explained — Understanding the most important climate data of the week. Sign up here
Energy Source — Essential energy news, analysis and insider intelligence. Sign up here