(Credits: Press)
Tue 16 December 2025 11:56, UK
By the time grunge hit the mainstream in the early 1990s, The Rolling Stones were already rock ‘n’ roll veterans.
As one of the most renowned British Invasion bands of the 1960s, they’d seen cultural empires rise and fall and had absorbed much of the music that came out of America at that time. Their ambition had risen from being a “cool blues band” to the best in London, and then, as their sonic palette developed, simply the best band in the world.
Indeed, their entire career had been founded on reinventing the music of early American bluesmen such as Robert Johnson and B.B. King. But the scope beyond this solid backbone changed. Over the years, they embraced R&B, soul, funk, disco, and everything in between. However, they were a little more opposed to the nihilistic punk infusions of grunge. And who could blame them?
In their own country, the punk bands that so many of these American grungesters looked up to had made The Rolling Stones a laughing stock. I mean, even Johnny Rotten once announced that he’d like to kill Mick Jagger and release the video footage, a statement he has since retracted.
It was clear that even Jagger was cracking under the weight of growing competition. In a bid to join the pointed side of this cultural protrusion, he regrettably addressed criticism of Some Girls by saying, “The next one is going to be more racist and more sexist. It’s going to be a whole bunch better.” It’s a comment he has since retracted, but it clearly showed he was feeling the heat.
Mick Jagger on stage with The Roling Stones. (Credits: Far Out / Alamy)
It’s not all that surprising, then, that when Jagger was asked to give his opinion on grunge in 1995, The Rolling Stones frontman confessed that he wasn’t much of a Nirvana fan but that he did like Pearl Jam. “I’m not in love with things at the moment. I was never crazy about Nirvana – too angst-ridden for me,” he said.
Continuing, “But I like Pearl Jam. I prefer them to a lot of other bands. There’s a lot of angst in a lot of it. Which is one of the great things to tap into. But I’m not a fan of moroseness.”
However, Jagger was quick to note that, despite the differences in the two genres’ sounds and lyrical content, grunge still owed a lot to ’60s rock. During that same interview with Rolling Stone, Jagger said that if “there’s four people playing guitars and so on, there’s a lot of ’60s influence. It may appear that they’re playing the same thing or look the same on MTV. Or there’s certain haircuts you’ve seen on the Byrds.”
“But the grooves are different,” Jagger continued, “It’s all influenced by dance music. In 30 years you don’t keep playing the same beat. Which is good. I don’t think any of these bands would claim to be daringly different.”
Adding, “But it’s heartening to return to live music. Heartening for people like me in a band. It’s a very traditional thing to return to. It re-validates the original form that we fell in love with.”
When framed simplistically like this, grunge seems to be merely distorted teenage rock at its core. So, perhaps it is unsurprising that Keith Richards actually claimed to have invented the genre. Discussing the Stones’ classic 1972 album Exile On Main Street, he explained how the album went against the grain to such an extent that it was almost scrapped. “It’s a funny thing. We had tremendous trouble convincing Atlantic to put out a double album,” Richards reflected.
He continued: “Initially, sales were fairly low. For a year or two, it was considered a bomb. This was an era where the music industry was full of these pristine sounds. We were going the other way. That was the first grunge record. Yes, it is one of the (Stones’) best.”
While it’s a rather tenuous claim, evidenced by the fact that Jagger doesn’t even care much for the genre, there is an ounce of truth to the fact that Exile on Main Street certainly shares the tenet of rugged discontent. Put it this way, it was certainly pretty far from the happy-clappy sentiments of rock ‘n’ roll just a few years prior, but it would be doing Neil Young a great disservice to say that the Stones were the true progenitors.
There is also perhaps truth to the notion that Pearl Jam were the closest of the Seattle clutch to the Stones. In fact, eventually, Jagger’s admiration of Pearl Jam convinced the frontman to invite Eddie Vedder onstage to perform a rather roughed-up ‘Wild Horses’ back in 2005. What’s more, Keith Richards asked Pearl Jam to perform as the opening act for his group X-pensive Winos in New York in 1992, between the release of their 1991 debut Ten and 1993’s Vs, in another showcase of admiration that has since been proving to flow both ways.
Related Topics