Each year, there is The Bike. Last year The Bike was the crazy Factor One that I spotted at the Dauphiné, with its wild fork and unusual… well, everything. The year before, we waited until late in the day, but The Bike was the leaked Colnago Y1Rs, with a radical seat cluster. Van Rysel, debuting at the Velofollies trade show in Belgium – which we will be bringing you a tech gallery from – has launched an early bid to become The Bike for 2026 with an undoubtedly crazy, non-production concept machine.

Dubbed the FTP^2, this bike is an e-assisted machine designed to double the rider’s FTP and allow them to reach previously unattainable speeds using a combination of added power and aerodynamic efficiency. It’s clearly a very striking machine, but is derived from some tried and tested trends. Beyond the bike, there is a total system involving ‘wireless shoes’, a new skinsuit, and a modular aero helmet, all of which very much sit outside the framework of the UCI’s technical regulations.

Hope x Lotus track bike, and the fresh-in-the-memory Factor One, with wide-set and extremely deep legs. Curiously, unlike the most aero bikes we’ve tested in the wind tunnel, which all have a bayonet fork, the FTP^2 opts for a traditional tapered head tube, which will have undoubtedly increased the frontal area of the machine.

The downtube is positively enormous, holding as it does the battery and Mahle M40 motor assembly to “multiply the input effort by up to four”. Cooling fins at the bottom bracket are the only initial indication that this is an e-bike, until you reach the cockpit, which to my mind is the most interesting part of the whole setup.

Riders seeking an aero advantage nowadays are rarely ever seen in the drops, the traditional go-fast hand position of old, with it normally reserved for sprinting currently. Clearly the Van Rysel team was wondering whether it would be advantageous, albeit distinctly illegal, to dispense with the lower portion of the bars anyway and create a bar that meshes with the hoods-in trend of recent seasons. The result is part TT base bar, part old school bullhorn, and part PlayStation controller, allowing the rider to control their gears, motor, computer, and (I can’t believe I’m saying this) shoes.

Naturally, a futuristic aero machine needs some deep wheels, and it feels somewhat fitting that a bike with a fake UCI sticker with the word ‘NO’ on it is kitted out with 85mm deep Swiss Side wheels, as it was the brand to write an open letter of complaint to the UCI following its ruling on maximum rim depths last year.

Unsurprisingly, with so many added bells and whistles, the FTP^2 is no featherweight, tipping the scales at 15kg in a size M.

released the aptly named fUCI ten years ago, and much of what was unorthodox then remains so now thanks to the UCI’s aversion to change. That, too, was an e-assisted machine, complete with illegal fairings, unorthodox trispoke wheels of non-standard size, no seat tube, and additional electronic cockpit integration via the housing of a smartphone.

I think it’s perhaps unfair to say the FTP^2 is a derivative concept machine, though there is a clear lineage between the two, but it is definitely noteworthy that much of what was deemed controversial, illegal, and unorthodox in competitive bicycle design a full decade ago remains as such today, such is the stagnating effect of the UCI on racing bicycle development.

I have long been a proponent of the pros having their own race machines, separate from the commercial options you or I get to ride (and no, for the avoidance of doubt I don’t think the pro’s should be on e-bikes). I think it’d make for better race bikes, and better consumer bikes, and I think with bikes like the Factor One, Ridley Noah Fast 3.0, and Colnago Y1Rs we are approaching that point already to some degree.

It’s clear, with concepts like these, that there is a pretty major gulf between what is possible and what is commercially viable, thanks to the UCI rulebook, even if I’m not personally sold on the thought of having to charge my shoes.