Hueting, R. & Reijnders, L. Sustainability is an objective concept. Ecol. Econ. 27, 139–147 (1998).


Google Scholar
 

Brundtland, G. H. Our common future—call for action. Environ. Conserv. 14, 291–294 (1987).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Sachs, J. D. et al. Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 805–814 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Murdock, C. R., Didas, S. A. & Jones, C. W. Direct capture of CO2 from ambient air. Chem. Rev. 116, 11840–11876 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Petersen, K. et al. Potential of biobased materials for food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 10, 52–68 (1999).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Aucone, E. et al. Drone-assisted collection of environmental DNA from tree branches for biodiversity monitoring. Sci. Robot. 8, eadd5762 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Junge, K., Pires, C. & Hughes, J. Lab2Field transfer of a robotic raspberry harvester enabled by a soft sensorized physical twin. Commun. Eng. 2, 40 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Hawkes, E. W., Blumenschein, L. H., Greer, J. D. & Okamura, A. M. A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth. Sci. Robot. 2, eaan3028 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zhang, K. et al. Aerial additive manufacturing with multiple autonomous robots. Nature 609, 709–717 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Dunbabin, M. & Marques, L. Robots for environmental monitoring: significant advancements and applications. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19, 24–39 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Guenat, S. et al. Meeting sustainable development goals via robotics and autonomous systems. Nat. Commun. 13, 3559 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wiesemüller, F., Miriyev, A. & Kovac, M. Zero-footprint eco-robotics: A new perspective on biodegradable robots. In Proc. Aerial Robotic Systems Physically Interacting with the Environment 1–6 (IEEE, 2021).

Wiesemüller, F. et al. Biopolymer cryogels for transient ecology-drones. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2300037 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Mazzolai, B. & Laschi, C. A vision for future bioinspired and biohybrid robots. Sci. Robot. 5, eaba6893 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Floreano, D. et al. Towards edible robots and robotic food. Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 589–599 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

O’Grady, R. et al. Swarm-bots to the rescue. In Advances in Artificial Life: Darwin Meets von Neumann (eds Kampis, G. et al.), 165–172 (Springer, 2011).

Pfeifer, R. & Bongard, J. How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence (MIT Press, 2006).

Sitti, M. Physical intelligence as a new paradigm. Extreme Mech. Lett. 46, 101340 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Miriyev, A. & Kovač, M. Skills for physical artificial intelligence. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 658–660 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ji, Y. et al. Direct observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmion motion driven by ultra-low current density in van der Waals ferromagnets. Adv. Mater. 36, 2312013 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Smirnova, L. et al. Organoid intelligence (OI): the new frontier in biocomputing and intelligence-in-a-dish. Front. Sci. 1, 1017235 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gorecki, J. et al. Chemical computing with reaction–diffusion processes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140219 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Baltussen, M. G., de Jong, T. J., Duez, Q., Robinson, W. E. & Huck, W. T. S. Chemical reservoir computation in a self-organizing reaction network. Nature 631, 549–555 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Takinoue, M. DNA droplets for intelligent and dynamical artificial cells: from the viewpoint of computation and non-equilibrium systems. Interface Focus 13, 20230021 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, C. et al. Advancing physical intelligence for autonomous soft robots. Sci. Robot. 10, eads1292 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Lin, C., Zhao, X. & Sun, H. Analysis on the risk factors of intracranial infection secondary to traumatic brain injury. Chin. J. Traumatol. 18, 81–83 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Mack, M. J. Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 285, 568–572 (2001).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Dreyfus, R. et al. Dexterous helical magnetic robot for improved endovascular access. Sci. Robot. 9, eadh0298 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Song, S., Fallegger, F., Trouillet, A., Kim, K. & Lacour, S. P. Deployment of an electrocorticography system with a soft robotic actuator. Sci. Robot. 8, eadd1002 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Upchurch, M. Robots and AI at work: the prospects for singularity. New Technol. Work Employ. 33, 205–218 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Iskandar, M., Albu-Schäffer, A. & Dietrich, A. Intrinsic sense of touch for intuitive physical human-robot interaction. Sci. Robot. 9, eadn4008 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zoss, A. B., Kazerooni, H. & Chu, A. Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 11, 128–138 (2006).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Kim, J. et al. Reducing the metabolic rate of walking and running with a versatile, portable exosuit. Science 365, 668–672 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Häusermann, D. et al. FireDrone: multi-environment thermally agnostic aerial robot. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2300101 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Li, L. et al. Aerial-aquatic robots capable of crossing the air-water boundary and hitchhiking on surfaces. Sci. Robot. 7, eabm6695 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Sethi, S. S., Kovac, M., Wiesemüller, F., Miriyev, A. & Boutry, C. M. Biodegradable sensors are ready to transform autonomous ecological monitoring. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1245–1247 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Papanek, V. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change 2nd edn (Chicago Review, 2005).

Herzog, L., Jansen, T. & Weschler, L. Strandbeest: The Dream Machines of Theo Jansen (TASCHEN, 2014).

Hubbard, J. D. et al. Fully 3D-printed soft robots with integrated fluidic circuitry. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe5257 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zhai, Y. et al. Desktop fabrication of monolithic soft robotic devices with embedded fluidic control circuits. Sci. Robot. 8, eadg3792 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Song, S., Joshi, S. & Paik, J. CMOS-inspired complementary fluidic circuits for soft robots. Adv. Sci. 8, 2100924 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Lange, I. D. et al. Coral restoration can drive rapid reef carbonate budget recovery. Curr. Biol. 34, 1341–1348.e1343 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Farinha, A. T. et al. Off-shore and underwater sampling of aquatic environments with the aerial-aquatic drone MEDUSA. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 1023269 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zych, A. et al. Underwater quick-hardening vegetable oil-based biodegradable putty for sustainable coral reef restoration and rehabilitation. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 8, 2400110 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Jones, D. O. B. et al. Long-term impact and biological recovery in a deep-sea mining track. Nature 642, 112–118 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gibbs, E. P. J. The evolution of One Health: a decade of progress and challenges for the future. Vet. Rec. 174, 85–91 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

One Health High-Level Expert Panel et al. One Health: a new definition for a sustainable and healthy future. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010537 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Blois, J. L., Zarnetske, P. L., Fitzpatrick, M. C. & Finnegan, S. Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341, 499–504 (2013).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Meder, F. et al. Ultraconformable, self-adhering surface electrodes for measuring electrical signals in plants. Adv. Mater. Technol. 6, 2001182 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zhu, C., Guo, D., Ye, D., Jiang, S. & Huang, Y. Flexible PZT-integrated, bilateral sensors via transfer-free laser lift-off for multimodal measurements. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 37354–37362 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Roderick, W. R. T., Cutkosky, M. R. & Lentink, D. Bird-inspired dynamic grasping and perching in arboreal environments. Sci. Robot. 6, eabj7562 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Adamski, M. Effectiveness analysis of UCAV used in modern military conflicts. Aviation 24, 66–71 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Van Roijen, E., Miller, S. A. & Davis, S. J. Building materials could store more than 16 billion tonnes of CO2 annually. Science 387, 176–182 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Abanades, J. C., Criado, Y. A. & White, H. I. Direct capture of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere using bricks of calcium hydroxide. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 4, 101339 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Lura, P. et al. Mining the atmosphere: a concrete solution to global warming. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 212, 107968 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Lee, K. Y. et al. An autonomously swimming biohybrid fish designed with human cardiac biophysics. Science 375, 639–647 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Schiavone, G. et al. Soft, implantable bioelectronic interfaces for translational research. Adv. Mater. 32, 1906512 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zhang, K. et al. Reinforced safety-related condition awareness in a motion planning system for remote manipulators in nuclear decommissioning. In Proc. 9th International Conference on Control and Robotics Engineering 196–201 (IEEE, 2024).