‘We can do better’ – AusCycling re-examines junior development pathway for talented young Australians

That led to the questions, said Fechner, of: “How do we nurture these kids, and are we doing the best job we can? Where we landed was, ‘we can do better’.”

You may like

AusCycling, formed from the binding of federations across varied cycling disciplines in 2020, is the nation’s recognised cycling body and works across the grassroots level to elite. It hosts National Championships events, plays a part in bidding for international events and also holds sway in the selection of athletes to represent Australia at World Championships events, even if, at junior level many of the national teams and programs are self-funded.

To guide the process, AusCycling appointed Chelsea Warr, who has wide ranging experience in both the British and Australian high performance space, delivered a report that identified 10 “considerations” which included defining and communicating a clearer pathway strategy with embedded rider development and selection principles, improved communication of selection criteria, minimum performance standards, integration of the development and selection process, a separation of the policy for Olympic and non-Olympic disciplines – which according to the report “feel undeserved and overlooked by the current policy” – and unlocking sponsorship, philanthropy and partnerships to help with resourcing.

“The 10 findings that we are now looking at how to implement, those are really clear. I think the consultation that happened was great, the engagement was fantastic. This matters to people, which is good,” said Fechner, with how much it matters evident by the responses to the report on social media.

The fact that many were less than positive, however, highlights that AusCycling has a challenge ahead as it works to bring along athletes, parents and coaches as well as the broader sporting public along for the rider as it works to implement the recommendations by the middle of next year.

The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!

One of the hurdles is that government funding for high performance in Australia – the federation’s largest source of money – is focused on Olympic and Paralympic sports, with that funding which comes from the Australian Sports Commission, an allocation of $14,643,022 in the 2024/25 financial year, largely tied to medal prospects. Still, AusCycling represents a number of disciplines that fall outside that realm, and there are also many more events where the national federation is expected to step in.

“Certainly one of our biggest challenges is not having enough resource, probably to meet the expectations of the community,” said Fechner.

“The reality is that the UCI has World Championships, and for those we are responsible for selecting teams and sending teams. “A large portion of our performance pathways, and when we get to World Championships, is funded in part or fully by athletes.”

You may like

Max Goold riding to tenth in the men’s Junior Individual Time Trial at the 2025 Road World Championships in Rwanda (Image credit: Getty Images)

Road World Championships are certainly just one part of the puzzle, with a range of opportunities supported including junior development camps, but to use the event which is currently underway as an example, AusCycling said it funds a range of significant expenses to enable all its athletes to compete, which include staff, clothing costs and distribution, compliance requirements, administration and logistics that are generally not charged to athletes.

There are then levies to cover the costs directly associated with their participation, from flights to accommodation and meals, and while AusCycling’s contribution to these for elite athletes was 100%, the cover was reduced to 50% for U23 riders and for the junior riders there is none, and U19s have also been asked to pay a small component of staff costs.