Scull’s movement-heavy approach drew an immediate backlash. The pace was low. Exchanges were limited. Viewers expected more engagement and did not get it. That reaction hardened quickly, and with it came a simplified reading of the performance as negative or evasive.
What was rarely acknowledged was how narrow the stylistic gap actually was between Scull’s approach and the one Terence Crawford used in his own victory over Alvarez. Both relied on mobility, distance control, and restraint. The difference was one of emphasis. Scull stayed on the move more consistently, and that distinction proved enough to shift the tone of the response.
Offensively, Scull was more effective than he was often credited for being. He showed more power than Crawford did in his win. He committed to combinations. There were moments when Alvarez appeared reluctant to initiate exchanges, wary of counters, and hesitant to step in cleanly. It was a familiar look, one also seen in Alvarez’s loss to Dmitry Bivol.
None of that changed the outcome. It did, however, complicate the idea that Scull was simply avoiding the fight. He was landing with enough authority to discourage risk, even if he never forced a change in momentum.
His upcoming bout against Jacob Bank does not offer an easy recalibration. Bank is unbeaten, active, and coming off a knockout win over former titleholder Tyron Zeuge. He is ranked and fighting at home. The circumstances leave little room for a quiet performance.
Scull now carries the weight of how his last fight was received. Repeating the same approach is likely to confirm existing criticism. Altering it introduces risk against a younger opponent with momentum. Neither path is comfortable.
This return will not revisit what happened in Riyadh. That chapter is closed. What remains open is whether Scull adjusts to the way he is now viewed, or continues to trust the style that brought him this far.
Dan Ambrose has been a leading voice at Boxing News 24 for years, known for his no-nonsense takes on the sport. Love him or hate him, Dan has built a strong following thanks to his outspoken analysis, direct opinions, and in-depth coverage of the global boxing scene.
His articles often spark debate among fans, as he isn’t afraid to challenge popular narratives or question fighters’ performances. Alongside his opinion pieces, Dan provides fight news, previews, and post-fight breakdowns that give readers both detail and perspective.