Should the pension triple lock be scrapped to help balance the books, or is it a vital lifeline for retirees? With pressure mounting on Rachel Reeves, we want to know what you think
Rachel Reeves is facing growing calls to ditch the state pension triple lock(Image: Getty)
Rachel Reeves is facing growing calls to ditch the state pension triple lock after a stark warning from the International Monetary Fund.
The global financial watchdog warned that the Chancellor will struggle to keep the public finances in check without either raising taxes or cutting spending – but would scrapping the triple lock altogether be a fairer solution? Take our poll below.
The “pension triple lock” is basically a promise from the government to make sure the State Pension keeps going up annually. Each year, your pension will rise by whichever is highest: inflation, average earnings growth, or 2.5%. So even if inflation’s low, you’re still guaranteed at least that 2.5% boost.
The whole idea is to help pensioners keep up with the rising cost of living and make sure the value of their pension doesn’t shrink over time. But, all this could change.
In a significant move, the IMF suggested that Rachel Reeves might have to reconsider Labour’s pledge not to raise taxes on working people, and called for potential reforms to pensions and public services. The report stated: “The triple lock could be replaced with a policy of indexing the state pension to the cost of living.”
It also proposed introducing charges for higher earners using NHS services and broadening means testing for benefits, arguing that access to public services should “depend more on an individual’s capacity to pay”.
Should the pension triple lock be scrapped? Take our poll below, and if you can’t see it click here
Arguments for Scrapping the Triple Lock
It’s becoming increasingly expensive, especially as more people claim pensions and the population ages.Younger workers fund the system but may not receive the same benefits.State Pensions can rise faster than average earnings, which some argue is unfair to working-age people.The triple lock limits the government’s flexibility in managing public finances, especially during economic downturns.It benefits all pensioners equally, regardless of need. Some suggest more targeted support for those on low incomes would be fairer.
Arguments for Keeping the Triple Lock
It ensures pensions keep pace with the cost of living, helping older people maintain financial stability.The triple lock helps reduce poverty among retirees, especially those relying heavily on the State Pension.It stops the real value of the pension from eroding due to inflation.The policy gives people confidence that the State Pension is reliable and will support them in retirement.Scrapping it could be seen as breaking a political promise, damaging trust in the system and in government.
Be the first with news from Mirror Politics
BLUESKY: Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here – Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn.
POLITICS WHATSAPP: Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
NEWSLETTER: Or sign up here to the Mirror’s Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox.
PODCAST: And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday.