You have six weeks left to secretly work from home.
getty
Updated on Jan. 24 with new analysis on Microsoft’s work location tracking.
We’ve all been there. Stretching hybrid or work from home policies when needed. Trusting our usual virtual background on Teams to mask an untidy living room or kitchen table from colleagues. But Microsoft now has some very bad news.
Microsoft confirms that its Microsoft 365 Roadmap is about to add a crafty new feature. “When users connect to their organization’s Wi-Fi, Teams will automatically set their work location to reflect the building they are working in.” Conversely, if you’re not connected to work Wi-Fi, then it shows that instead and you will be found out.
As Neowin explains, “if you are late for work, do some work from home, or do anything on Teams and Outlook from any network that is not your organization’s, your employer would know about this. This obviously did not sit well with workers who either work in hybrid setups or do not appreciate this type of invasion of privacy.”
ForbesApple’s Upgrade Decision—Just 6 Weeks To Change Your iPhoneBy Zak Doffman
It seems Microsoft may have noted the controversy this update has raised. Originally slated for January, the update was then pushed to February and has now been pushed again, this time to March. It is expected to be rolled out fully by mid that month.
“Microsoft did not provide a reason for the delay,” UC Today says. “The update applies to Teams for Windows desktop and Teams for Mac desktop.”
The UC specialists also report that Microsoft emphasizes “user controls and guardrails.” Specifically, “the feature is opt-in, will be off by default, and Teams ‘will not update the location’ after working hours and will ‘clear (it) at the end of their working hours.’”
Don’t get too excited, though. Yes, “this feature will be off by default.” But Microsoft says “tenant admins will decide whether to enable it and require end-users to opt-in.”
Per Neowin, “while Microsoft is seemingly trying to find a balance for this by disabling this location tracking feature, requiring IT admins to turn it on, and then have end-users opt-in, it doesn’t really help. This entire process falls apart if your organization enforces the enablement of location tracking as a mandatory policy, giving its workforce no way to opt out.”
Why is this so contentious? UC Today asks. The answer is fairly simple and goes to a much broader pushback against work platforms tracking locations and behavior.
“On paper, auto-setting work location sounds like straightforward UX housekeeping. It’s one less field for users to maintain manually, one less friction point for already overloaded employees. In practice, it sits squarely on a fault line that tech buyers increasingly recognize: hybrid work is governed as much by trust as by tooling.”
Windows Central goes further than this. “I speculated that the controversial feature aligns closely with Microsoft’s return-to-office plan, prompting questions about whether this is merely coincidental or a deliberate effort to intensify workplace surveillance and micromanagement.” Those are certainly the angles driving a backlash.
“The company hasn’t provided an explanation for the delayed rollout of the feature,” Windows Central says. “Perhaps it is using the additional time to address some of the concerns and kinks raised by users.”
ForbesGoogle Starts Upgrading Gmail—Millions Of Accounts Now At RiskBy Zak Doffman
I expect when this goes live, we will see a mix of blunt opt-ins and more sensitive HR management of a new tool that has now generated plenty of headlines. We may also see additional user protections, including limiting who can view locations.
What is clear, though, is that this tool can be used to police adherence to policies around when people work outside the office. And plenty of enterprises will do exactly that.
“Enterprises still have to define purpose, access, and acceptable use, preferably before the first pilot,” UC Today warns. “Otherwise, a feature built to reduce friction could end up creating it, just in a different place.” Indeed — quite literally.