LS
Lewis Silkin
More
We have two things at our core: people – both ours and yours – and a focus on creativity, technology and innovation.
Whether you are a fast growth start up or a large multinational business, we help you realise the potential in your people and navigate your strategic HR and legal issues, both nationally and internationally. Our award-winning employment team is one of the largest in the UK, with dedicated specialists in all areas of employment law and a track record of leading precedent setting cases on issues of the day. The team’s breadth of expertise is unrivalled and includes HR consultants as well as experts across specialisms including employment, immigration, data, tax and reward, health and safety, reputation management, dispute resolution, corporate and workplace environment.
Our central finding is a paradox: confidence at the top is high, yet long-term preparedness remains fragile. More than 85% of organisations regard themselves as well-prepared for the ongoing change, and nearly 80%…
United Kingdom
Technology
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Article Insights
Alessandro De Arcangelis’s articles from Lewis Silkin are most popular:
within Technology topic(s)
in United Kingdom
with readers working within the Technology, Metals & Mining and Oil & Gas industries
Lewis Silkin are most popular:
within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)
Lewis Silkin’s Future @ Work 2026 report explores how
organisations are navigating an era defined by accelerating
uncertainty: rapid advances in AI, geopolitical instability,
regulatory fragmentation, demographic shifts and changing workforce
expectations are profoundly reshaping today’s business
environment. As a result, uncertainty for senior leaders has become
a permanent strategic condition.
The confidence paradox
Our central finding is a paradox: confidence at the top is high,
yet long-term preparedness remains fragile. More than 85% of
organisations regard themselves as well-prepared for the ongoing
change, and nearly 80% say its pace of change is manageable. At the
same time, more than half of employers prioritise short-term
outcomes in practice, and workforce planning rarely extends beyond
12 months. While 79% say they aim to balance short and long-term
priorities, 52% ultimately lean towards the short term.
This compressed planning horizon creates a widespread perception
of readiness, yet obscures deeper capability gaps in leadership,
skills, workforce design and culture. For C-suite and senior
leaders, the key implication is that confidence anchored in
short-term responsiveness can mask structural vulnerabilities that
only become visible over time.
The AI Adoption challenge
Across the dataset, 93% identify skills and AI literacy
shortages as a constraint, 81% highlight weaknesses in data
governance and ethical frameworks, and 80% point to leadership and
strategic integration challenges.
AI therefore represents both the most powerful driver of
transformation and the clearest test of leadership capability. Many
organisations are experimenting under competitive or client
pressure to demonstrate progress, even where the business case or
organisational readiness is still forming.
Executive optimism vs operational reality
A second tension emerges between executive optimism and
operational reality. Senior leaders tend to focus on productivity
and efficiency gains, not least in relation to AI adoption. In this
context, 41% cite efficiency as the primary anticipated benefit,
alongside improved decision-making through data insight at 32%, and
improved workforce and customer experience at 31% and 29%
respectively. Yet, HR and operational leaders are more acutely
aware of implementation barriers, including capability gaps,
cultural resistance and regulatory uncertainty.Â
Investment imbalance: technology over people
Investment patterns reinforce this imbalance: around 74% of
anticipated spend is directed towards technology, data and
platforms rather than workforce development. This skew persists
across sectors and is especially pronounced among larger
organisations and executive respondents confident in technology-led
returns. This, in turn, generates a widening gap between technical
ambition and human-centred capability.
Leadership under strain
Leadership capability itself is under strain, too. Strategic
change is overwhelmingly driven from the top, while buy-in below
remains uneven. An energy gap, for example, is visible between
senior leadership and the rest of the organisation, as middle
management, in particular, emerges as a pressure point. Many
organisations promote strong technical performers into management
roles without equipping them with coaching, feedback, conflict
management and ambiguity-navigation skills. Unsurprisingly, where
employee sentiment has shifted negatively, leadership and change
management shortcomings are among the most frequently cited
causes.
Succession planning compounds the challenge. Few organisations
can map a clear leadership pipeline beyond the near term. As AI
reshapes early-career work, there is a structural risk of
developing ‘diamond-shaped’ organisations with fewer
entry-level roles, a bulge in mid-career talent, and a shrinking
pool of future leaders. For sectors such as financial services,
which are most likely to anticipate transformation or reduction in
entry-level pathways, this is an urgent strategic concern.
Geopolitical and regulatory volatility
Geopolitical and regulatory volatility further constrains
long-term planning. 79% of respondents say political and regulatory
uncertainty hinders sustained workforce strategy, with economic
volatility cited by 57%. While some organisations are responding
with scenario-based planning, pre-emptive cost controls and
strengthened compliance capability, maturity varies, and a
two-speed approach is emerging: proactive governance in areas such
as AI, coupled with reactive responses to evolving employment, pay
transparency and working time reforms.
ESG and DEI: strategy or compliance?
ESG and DEI commitments present a similar divergence. 78% of
organisations measure the value of these commitments, and over half
describe them as embedded within strategy and culture. However, 21%
approach them primarily as compliance obligations. Larger
organisations, in particular, emphasise risk mitigation and
disclosure. For senior leaders, the strategic question is whether
ESG and DEI are treated as drivers of resilience, innovation and
talent attraction, or as reporting burdens. In this context, the
top cited value drivers remain attraction and retention at 40%,
long-term sustainability at 36%, and innovation and new business
opportunities at 35%.
Employee sentiment and change fatigue
Encouragingly, almost 70% of organisations now place greater
emphasis on meaningful work, culture and values than on pay alone
in their employee value proposition, and 56% report positive shifts
in employee sentiment, often linked to better communication,
wellbeing and flexible working. Yet, change fatigue remains a real
issue, as planning, strategy and leadership issues are among the
most prominent drivers of negative sentiment. Similarly, fear
around uncertainty and passive resistance can equally undermine
transformation efforts.
Strategic recommendations for senior leaders
The report also includes an array of strategic recommendations.
Senior leaders who are keen to future-proof their organisations may
find some of these particularly salient.
Stress-test confidence beyond the 12-month horizon. Readiness
must be evaluated in terms of structural capability, and not
immediate responsiveness.
Rebalance investment between technology and people, as
sustainable AI adoption undeniably requires parallel investment in
skills, leadership and culture.
Strengthen middle-management capability and protect leadership
pipelines, particularly as early-career pathways evolve.
Embed scenario planning and regulatory forecasting as core
executive disciplines.
Close the gap between boardroom optimism and operational
insight: effective strategy depends on understanding the cumulative
pressures experienced across the entire organisation.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.