Keyes, C. L. M. The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J. Health Soc. Behav. 43, 207–222 (2002).
Trudel-Fitzgerald, C. et al. Psychological well-being as part of the public health debate? Insight into dimensions, interventions, and policy. BMC Public Health 19, 1712 (2019).
Diener, E., Pressman, S. D., Hunter, J. & Delgadillo-Chase, D. If, why, and when subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 9, 133–167 (2017).
Sarracino, F. & J. O’Connor, K. Governments should prioritize well-being over economic growth. Nat. Hum. Behav. 9, 2003–2005 (2025).
Mental Health Geneva (World Health Organization, 2025).
Iasiello, M. et al. What’s the difference between measures of wellbeing, quality of life, resilience, and coping? An umbrella review and concept map of 155 measures of positive mental health. Int. J. Wellbeing 14, 1–25 (2024).
Lomas, T. et al. The development of the Global Flourishing Study questionnaire: charting the evolution of a new 109-item inventory of human flourishing. BMC Glob. Public Health 3, 30 (2025).
Frijters, P. & Krekel, C. A Handbook for Wellbeing Policy-Making: History, Theory, Measurement, Implementation, and Examples (Oxford Univ. Press, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192896803.001.0001
Bohlmeijer, E. & Westerhof, G. The model for sustainable mental health: future directions for integrating positive psychology into mental health care. Front. Psychol. 12, 747999 (2021).
VanderWeele, T. J. et al. Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being. Prev. Med. 133, 106004 (2020).
Martela, F. Being as having, loving, and doing: a theory of human well-being. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 28, 372–397 (2024).
Jarden, A. & Roache, A. What is wellbeing? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 5006 (2023).
Novak, L. F., Fowers, B. J., Kiknadze, N. C. & Calder, A. J. A close analysis of eight flourishing measures. J. Posit. Psychol. 20, 72–82 (2025).
Hone, L., Jarden, A., Schofield, G. M. & Duncan, S. Measuring flourishing: the impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. Int. J. Wellbeing 4, 62–90 (2014).
Blodgett, J. M., Birch, J. M., Musella, M., Harkness, F. & Kaushal, A. What works to improve wellbeing? A rapid systematic review of 223 interventions evaluated with the Warwick–Edinburgh mental well-being scales. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 15845 (2022).
Lombardo, P., Jones, W., Wang, L., Shen, X. & Goldner, E. M. The fundamental association between mental health and life satisfaction: results from successive waves of a Canadian national survey. BMC Public Health 18, 342 (2018).
Jovanović, V. et al. A cross-cultural evaluation of Diener’s tripartite model of subjective well-being across 16 countries. J. Happiness Stud. 25, 82 (2024).
Tennant, R. et al. The Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 5, 63 (2007).
Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R. & Kashdan, T. B. The hierarchical framework of wellbeing (HiFWB). Front. Psychol. 16, 1515423 (2025).
van Zyl, L. E. & Rothmann, S. Grand challenges for positive psychology: future perspectives and opportunities. Front. Psychol. 13, 833057 (2022).
Lomas, T. & VanderWeele, T. J. Toward an expanded taxonomy of happiness: a conceptual analysis of 16 distinct forms of mental wellbeing. J. Humanist. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678231155512 (2023).
Ruggeri, K., Garcia-Garzon, E., Maguire, Á, Matz, S. & Huppert, F. A. Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 18, 192 (2020).
Fabian, M. A Theory of Subjective Wellbeing (Oxford Univ. Press, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197635261.003.0001
Michie, S. et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann. Behav. Med. 46, 81–95 (2013).
Diener, E. Subjective well-being. Psychol. Bull. 95, 542–575 (1984).
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67 (2000).
Ryff, C. D. & Keyes, C. L. M. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69, 719–727 (1995).
Martela, F. & Steger, M. F. The three meanings of meaning in life: distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. J. Posit. Psychol. 11, 531–545 (2016).
Willen, S. S., Williamson, A. F. & Walsh, C. C. Who gets to define flourishing? Disentangling social science from theology in flourishing measurement and policy prescriptions. SSM Ment. Health 7, 100377 (2025).
VanderWeele, T. J. et al. Flourishing in critical dialogue. SSM Ment. Health 3, 100172 (2023).
van Zyl, L. E., Gaffaney, J., van der Vaart, L., Dik, B. J. & Donaldson, S. I. The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: a systematic review. J. Posit. Psychol. 19, 206–235 (2024).
Alexandrova, A. A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).
Beck, E. D., Cheung, F., Thapa, S. & Jackson, J. J. Towards a personalized happiness approach to capturing change in satisfaction. Nat. Hum. Behav. 9, 1391–1404 (2025).
Willen, S. S., Williamson, A. F., Walsh, C. C., Hyman, M. & Tootle, W. Rethinking flourishing: critical insights and qualitative perspectives from the U.S. Midwest. SSM Ment. Health 2, 100057 (2022).
Kiknadze, N. C. & Fowers, B. J. Cultural variation in flourishing. J. Happiness Stud. 24, 2223–2244 (2023).
Hendriks, T. et al. How WEIRD are positive psychology interventions? A bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials on the science of well-being. J. Posit. Psychol. 14, 489–501 (2019).
Wilkes, J., Garip, G., Kotera, Y. & Fido, D. Can Ikigai predict anxiety, depression, and well-being?. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 21, 2941–2953 (2023).
Roache, A. Mapping Wellbeing: Exploring Lay Concepts of Wellbeing and How They Compare with Positive Psychology Approaches – A Mixed Methods Study of New Zealand Adults (Auckland Univ. Technology, 2025).
Iasiello, M. et al. Measuring well-being: creating a taxonomy and item bank for positive mental health. Preprint at ResearchSquare https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6862291/v1 (2025).
Joshanloo, M., Van de Vliert, E. & Jose, P. E. in The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Education. (eds. Kern, M. L. & Wehmeyer, M. L.) 675–703 (Springer, 2021).
Fowers, B. J., Novak, L. F., Kiknadze, N. C. & Calder, A. J. Questioning contemporary universalist approaches to human flourishing. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 27, 121–134 (2023).
Martela, F., Joshanloo, M. & Krys, K. Autonomy is associated with well-being across the world, but more strongly in wealthy and individualistic countries. Soc. Indic. Res. 181, 27 (2025).
Willroth, E. C. The benefits and challenges of a unifying conceptual framework for well-being constructs. Affect. Sci. 4, 41–44 (2023).
Kotov, R. et al. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126, 454–477 (2017).
Goodman, F. R. Assessing well-being in clinical research and treatment. Nat. Mental Health 3, 167–174 (2025).
Müller, A. et al. Proposed diagnostic criteria for compulsive buying-shopping disorder: a Delphi expert consensus study. J. Behav. Addict. 10, 208–222 (2021).
Jünger, S., Payne, S. A., Brine, J., Radbruch, L. & Brearley, S. G. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat. Med. 31, 684–706 (2017).
Cebral-Loureda, M., Tamés-Muñoz, E. & Hernández-Baqueiro, A. The fertility of a concept: a bibliometric review of human flourishing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 2586 (2022).
Häder, M. Delphi-Befragungen: Ein Arbeitsbuch (Springer, 2014).
Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 86, 420–428 (1979).
ten Hove, D., Jorgensen, T. D. & van der Ark, L. A. How to estimate intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater reliability from planned incomplete data. Multivariate Behav. Res. 60, 1042–1061 (2025).
Koo, T. K. & Li, M. Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. Med. 15, 155–163 (2016).
Biemann, T., Cole, M. S. & Voelpel, S. Within-group agreement: on the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. Leadership Quart. 23, 66–80 (2012).
Van Agteren, J., Iasiello, M. & Lo, L. A Guide to What Works for Mental Wellbeing (Beyond Blue, 2023).
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006).