During a narrative hearing this week, his lawyer John Scullion KC suggested Murrell would be able to repay the embezzled sum based on his assets, which have been frozen as part of a restraint order from the Crown under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
That restraint order has been lodged with the Register of Scotland and details of his assets, including the marital home he shares with his estranged wife Nicola Sturgeon, are included.
Details of the restraint order, first published by The Scotsman, show that it is “interdicting him from dealing” with his assets.
The listed assets include the £124,550 Niesmann+Bischoff motorhome, seized from outside his elderly mother’s home in Dunfermline, Fife.
A second listed asset states there is the “sum of £613,496.04″ as the “gross funds” in two Legal and General pension accounts.
Murrell’s “heritable property” is also listed to the value of £88,632 in the joint name of Peter Murrell and Nicola Sturgeon.
It comes as The Herald revealed Murrell will still be able to access legal aid despite the scale of his frozen assets.
The Scottish Legal Aid Board is unable to clawback criminal legal aid, with Murrell granted the taxpayer-funded support last year.
During the narrative hearing, senior counsel Mr Scullion said: “The value of the property in terms of restrained petition suggests there will be repayment of embezzlement in this case.”
Former first minister Ms Sturgeon told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg she would not “contribute in some way” to the reimbursement.
“There will now be, I would imagine, a legal process to recover the money from Peter that he embezzled from the SNP,” she said.
“That will be a legal process. I am not guilty of that embezzlement so nothing that belongs to me should be part of that, rightly. But will that process impact on me? Of course it will.”
It comes as the SNP lodges legal action against Murrell in an attempt to recoup the funds.
Mr Swinney confirmed to journalists on Thursday that some SNP members had requested a refund after initially donating to the party’s independence fund.
Police Scotland will also not investigate new complaints into the SNP’s accounts after independence activist Sean Clerkin reported the First Minister yesterday.
His complaint centred around Mr Swinney’s confession that more than £600,000 raised for independence campaigning between 2017 and 2019 had been spent on “general party campaigning”.
But Police Scotland confirmed there will be no new probe, similar to Operation Branchform, the investigation into how SNP finances earmarked for independence campaigning, were spent.
“That money is part of the resources that are available within the Scottish National Party to support its independence objectives and the SNP is a party of independence and that’s what we campaign for,” he said.
“We just campaigned for independence at the Scottish Parliament elections.”