![\"Wendy](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1758232930_861_960x0.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The main problem with Alien: Earth, in its first seven episodes, is the idiot ball, which I explained in my previous post<\/a> about the Hulu series. Nearly every character is incredibly stupid, or at least makes constantly stupid choices at every turn. This extends to the factions and organizations involved. The show probably ought to have been called Alien: Security Breach, but of course in order to actually breach security, you\u2019d need some there in the first place. Spoilers ahead.<\/p>\n On the USCSS Maginot, in Episode 5, almost every character, in nearly every situation, took a turn carrying the idiot ball<\/a>, including a trained scientist eating her lunch in a biolab and then failing to secure two alien containers. The only reason for this incessant stupidity? To drive the plot forward. Fans of the show excused this and other bad character choices by saying something like: \u201cThis crew isn\u2019t the cream of the crop. Nobody goes on a 65-year space mission unless they\u2019re desperate.\u201d You can\u2019t expect people on an important space voyage to actually be smart! <\/p>\n This misunderstands human nature entirely. Humanity has always had its adventurers and trailblazers, people who would go seek out \u201cThe New World\u201d on voyages that could take months, and expeditions that could take years or even entire lifetimes, risking life and limb. These people were not the bottom of the barrel. In a future with space travel, scientists and explorers would compete to go to space, even if it meant leaving loved ones behind. They would train rigorously for the honor. Only the best of the best would be sent on a crucial mission to retrieve dangerous alien species and bring them back to Earth.<\/p>\n I have a question: If these scientists and engineers and the rest of the crew were really just desperate, incompetent people (by design, in the script) how did they capture the aliens in the first place? Nothing about their actions after the fact lead me to believe they would have been able to secure dangerous Xenomorphs, deadly cockroaches, a super-intelligent eyeball alien and giant bugs that spew acid.<\/p>\n In Episode 6, one of the hybrid synths, who we are constantly told are super intelligent and super strong and overall better than their human and synth counterparts, awkwardly tries to put a tray of food inside the bug cell and, thanks to the eyeball-sheep\u2019s quick thinking, is trapped in the cell and killed. You can excuse this by saying \u201cHe\u2019s just a kid\u201d but then I have to ask: What are the rules for these hybrids, exactly, wthin the fiction? Because some of them act like complete idiots, but Wendy is constantly outsmarting everyone. Are they super intelligent or are they just kids? The show never establishes any real parameters.<\/p>\n Wendy, of course, is the exception. She is the worst kind of tropey modern Hollywood writing in one implausible and obnoxious bundle. Wendy, unlike the other hybrids, is always one step ahead. She is the bravest. She is the strongest. She can speak the Xenomorph\u2019s language and even makes one her pet who she can order to kill enemy guards. Earlier in the season, she killed a Xenomorph (offscreen) with a paper-cutter blade. Everyone else is easily duped and manipulated, but not Wendy. Wendy is special, we\u2019re told over and over again.<\/p>\n Wendy, alas, is Alien\u2019s very own Mary Sue. We can compare her to the franchise\u2019s first protagonist, Ellen Ripley, to drive this point home. <\/p>\n For those who do not know, a Mary Sue is a character (typically female in modern discourse, but I believe the term applies to both male and female characters) who is good at everything without having to really try and who everyone loves and looks up to just because. A Mary Sue is unrealistically perfect and typically idolized by everyone else in the cast. They are generally presented without flaws and overpowered. The story revolves around this character in ways that feel hackneyed and forced. <\/p>\n Ultimately, this makes for a pretty uninteresting character. Unfortunately, Wendy ticks every box. In the latest pair of episodes, she becomes instantly disillusioned with Prodigy and its leader, Boy Kavalier, when they wipe the traumatic memories of her fellow hybrid, Nibs. This is not a position she comes to over time. She is simply on a higher moral ground from the outset. There is no real character development that leads to her adoption of her new moral code \u2013 some version of \u201cnobody should have anything erased\u201d though I\u2019m paraphrasing \u2013 but we, as the audience, are supposed to root for her and view this as a deeply principled stance. Nevermind that Nibs immediately starts going crazy again once Wendy intervenes, and that she ultimately dies because of Wendy\u2019s actions. Wendy is always good and right. When her brother, Joe, blasts Wendy to stop her from killing more Prodigy security guards, Wendy is aghast. \u201cWhat did you do!?\u201d she hollers at him over and over again before the credits roll. We are supposed to be aghast as well, because Wendy is not just the darling of Boy Kavalier, but of the show\u2019s writers and creators. Like the sea in Rings Of Power, Wendy is always right.<\/p>\n I had a very similar criticism of Fargo Season 5, which was also created and written by Alien: Earth creator, Noah Hawley, and featured some of the same actors. That season completely changed the formula from every previous season of the show, and the movie upon which the show is based. In Fargo, there are four character archetypes. Spoilers for that series ahead.<\/p>\n The Citizen: This is a character who is normal in every possible way, living an unexceptional life, who makes a morally dubious choice that leads them down The Path Of No Return. The choices they make lead to suffering and ultimately karmic retribution. Think of Lester from Season 1 who kills his wife and then goes to great lengths to cover up his crime. For a while he\u2019s able to live a good life, free from his wife\u2019s nagging and resentment toward his brother, who he frames. But in the end, he pays the piper.The Criminal Element: This character or characters represents the dark side of humanity. Sometimes the Criminal Element is separated into two parts. One is more mundane \u2013 Steve Buscemi\u2019s Carl in the film \u2013 and one is Primordial \u2013 Peter Stormare\u2019s Swede. Whatever the case, The Criminal Element is invited into the normal lives of everyday people when they are invited by The Citizen. In the film, William H. Macy\u2019s Jerry Lundegaard hires Carl and the Swede to kidnap his wife so he can extort money from his father-in-law to cover up his fraud. Once invited by The Citizen, the Criminal Element wreaks havoc on the lives of ordinary people. This is all part of the Path Of No Return.The Victim(s): These are the many people affected by the amoral choices of The Citizen, though only sometimes at the actual hands of The Citizen (Lester\u2019s wife). Mostly, The Victims die or suffer greatly at the hands of the Criminal Element, but only because The Citizen invited the bad guys in. In Season 5, the Victims\u2019 suffering was not due to The Citizen\u2019s actions.The Hero: Finally, we come to The Hero, often played by a police officer or officers in Fargo. Frances McDormand\u2019s Marge Gunderson is a great example. The Hero is rarely your typical heroic figure. Marge was pregnant and at an age where pregnancy is rare (McDormand was 38). She was not physically daunting, but she was smart and capable and could smell a rat. The Hero ultimately restores balance to the updended lives of the people impacted by The Citizen\u2019s poor choices and the Criminal Element\u2019s violence and evil.<\/p>\n In Season 5 of Fargo, Hawley abandoned pretty much all of these archetypes and the story format in favor of bundling The Citizen with The Hero: Dorothy Lyon (you see, already Hawley was toying with the idea of using classic stories like Wizard of Oz to buttress his own; it is just much more blatant in Alien: Earth\u2019s extended Peter Pan analogy).<\/p>\n Instead of selfish or immoral choices leading Dorothy down the Path Of No Return, she begins the story as the third archetype: The Victim. Hawley even reproduces the kidnapping scene from the film, but with Dorothy as the intended kidnapee. Of course, because Dorothy is also The Hero, she\u2019s able to fight off her captors. Unlike previous seasons, Dorothy never makes immoral choices. There is no real Citizen archetype in this season, nobody who welcomes in disaster. Rather, she is a Victim, on the run from an abusive husband (the mundane half of The Criminal Element) who she ultimately defeats, because she is also The Hero (the cop dies trying).<\/p>\n Dorothy Lyon, like Wendy, is a Mary Sue with all the unfortunate girlboss tropes on display. She is adored by everyone (even her mistrustful mother-in-law comes around) and tougher than everyone and smarter than everyone and constantly referred to as a \u201cTiger” all of which makes her a far less compelling character than Marge or the many other female protagonists this franchise has given us. It\u2019s a shame, too, because Juno Temple\u2019s performance was phenomenal and absolutely deserved the Emmy over Jodie Foster\u2019s lackluster showing in the far, far worse True Detective: Night Country.<\/p>\n In my analysis of Fargo Season 5, I wrote<\/a>:<\/p>\n In a true season of Fargo, Dorothy Lyon would not have been the victim of the Criminal Element, she would have been the one who let the genie out of the bottle because of some deep character flaw like cowardice (Jerry\/Lester) or denial (Peggy) or greed or vanity or sloth or jealousy or whatever other deadly sin you can think of. She would not have been a tiger or the hero of her own story, but the antagonist who brought ruin upon everything she loved. And normal, hard-working cops like Indira and Farr would have cleaned up the mess she made.In Hollywood\u2019s rush to create \u201cstrong female characters\u201d they have done Fargo and Dorothy Lyon a great disservice. Juno Temple did a terrific job with the role she was given, but how much more delicious would this story have been if she\u2019d gone down the Path Of No Return instead?<\/p>\n Perhaps Wendy will go down this path. She has used shocking violence to get her way, allowing the Xenomorph out of its cage despite knowing it would kill many innocent people in the process; not just security guards, but regular workers in the facility. She did this not out of ignorance or naivete, but with full knowledge of what would come next. We are meant to root for her, it seems, because the Evil Corporation is so evil and Wendy is so good and pure, and Joe is presented as a coward and traitor for turning on her, however meekly. But I\u2019m not sure it works. Wendy feels hollow to me. More than anything, I hope that our expectations at this point are dashed, and she becomes a villain.<\/p>\n Flaws are what make characters interesting. I don\u2019t mean \u201cjust make everyone wildly stupid\u201d when I say this. Some critics of my critique have said that \u201cstories about smart people are boring\u201d and I suppose if everyone always made the perfect choice every time, and faced no consequences or conflict, that would be true (and is integral to a critique of a Mary Sue-type character!) <\/p>\n Ultimately, I want characters to be complex. Make smart people do selfish things that lead to bad outcomes. Give genuinely good characters hard choices that put them in tight spots. Give us conflicted villains who do more than twirl mustaches (or read ominous passages from Peter Pan). Give characters choices between breaking their moral code to save a loved one, or sticking to their guns and losing something dear.<\/p>\n Prodigy thus far has been defined by its incompetence and the brash stupidity of its \u201cboy genius\u201d overlord. This is intended as a critique of corporate power and arrogance, but it\u2019s not very interesting if every choice the corporation and its leader make are stupid and rash. If we\u2019re not shown the ruthless intelligence of the villains, how do we ever truly undermine them in the story? It\u2019s a story on easy mode.<\/p>\n Plot holes and contrivances, the idiot ball doing its dirty work and a girlboss protagonist all conspire to make Alien: Earth a deeply unsatisfying entry in the franchise, though to be fair that is pretty much par for the course when it comes to Alien content post-Aliens. It looks gorgeous for the most part (though the Xenomorph is rather goofy looking at times) and sounds great (except for the insertion of modern rock songs) and many of the actors are nailing their performances. <\/p>\n But the story keeps going nowhere fast (you could almost certainly fit the entire thing into a two hour movie) and I can\u2019t help but wish this was a different tale altogether, focused not on these hybrid Lost Boys and Wendy and Boy \u201cPeter Pan\u201d Kavalier, but on the cyborg Morrow, the synth Kirsh and the eyeball alien. You know something is wrong when a demented sheep is one of the best characters in your TV show.<\/p>\n I discuss the problems with Alien: Earth in my newest video below<\/a>:<\/p>\n What do you think of the series so far? Let me know on Twitter<\/a>, Instagram<\/a>, or Facebook<\/a>. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel<\/a> and follow me here on this blog<\/a>. Sign up for my newsletter<\/a> for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.<\/p>\n