Learning AI<\/p>\n
The future belongs, Orrell asserted, to those who can combine AI fluency with their distinctly human capacities such as critical thinking, ethical reasoning, emotional intelligence, and leadership.<\/p>\n
\u201cUnfortunately, I think our current workforce systems are largely unprepared to meet this challenge,\u201d Orrell said. \u201cThey are underfunded, they\u2019re very slow to adapt, and they\u2019re poorly aligned to labor markets.\u201d<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, the speed of change spurred by artificial intelligence is \u201coff the charts,\u201d Orrell said. \u201cChanges in information technologies have profound social effects, [and] what makes this moment different is that the delivery network for artificial intelligence is already in place. It\u2019s in place via the phones we have in our pockets, the computers that we use at work, the broadband internet that we have. We already see that the adoption rate of the [AI] technology is way ahead of even the internet because that required us to build an entire infrastructure just to deliver the service.\u201d<\/p>\n
Because of that pace of change, it\u2019s important that workers have agency, he continued.<\/p>\n
\u201cI keep telling people with AI, \u2018No one is going to rescue you on this,\u2019\u201d Orrell said. \u201c\u2018No one is going to come and make it okay. You have to learn the technology.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
He next polled the room of 600-plus people, asking how many of them had ever used AI. Almost everyone raised their hand. His second question was how many were using it daily or hourly. Many fewer people put their hands in the air. \u201cWe need more people on the daily\u2013hourly side of this,\u201d he continued. \u201cYou need to figure out how it\u2019s working in your own jobs so that you\u2019ll have both higher productivity for yourself and be able to empathize, I think, with the workers [and] colleagues who are having to make this change.\u201d<\/p>\n
Workers must take responsibility, and employers and others need to equip them with the information and financial resources they\u2019ll need to chart their upskilling and reskilling pathways, Orrell said. He cited tools like enhanced individual training accounts and lifelong learning accounts modeled on existing retirement savings plans. He also urged a \u201cserious, in-depth national strategy around AI literacy.\u201d \u201cIt needs to start in elementary schools, and it needs to reach all the way up to the boardrooms,\u201d Orrell said.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s changing \u2026 rapidly every day\u2014new systems, new capacities\u2014and if you start out behind, you are going to not just stay behind, you are going to fall further and further behind,\u201d he said. \u201cIf we\u2019ve got populations that are not \u2026 learning this technology, they\u2019re putting themselves increasingly at a permanent disadvantage.\u201d<\/p>\n
13.4 million ready to work, but…<\/p>\n
There are good news stories for the economy, among them that (as of June 2025) the nation\u2019s unemployment rate had been at or below 4.5 percent for 44 consecutive months<\/a>, said plenary moderator William M. Rodgers III. However, Rodgers, vice president of community development research for the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, also noted that there are still about 13.4 million Americans who are looking for full-time work. \u201cThese [include] people who are still working part time for economic reasons. They want to work full time, but there\u2019s still a slack in their community. And then you have a set of people who \u2026 have stopped looking over the last four weeks, but if offered a job, they\u2019d take it.\u201d<\/p>\n Whenever she\u2019s in a room full of employers, Bishara W. Addison asks a couple of questions. Her first question is, do you post your job openings online? Nearly everybody says \u201cyes.\u201d Then she asks, can people fill out applications for these jobs on a smartphone? They never know the answer, she says.<\/p>\n She then informs employers that in some communities, about 50 percent of residents can access the internet only on their smartphones. \u201cSo that entire population of people is not applying for your job,\u201d said Addison, director of workforce innovation for the Fund for Our Economic Future in Cleveland, Ohio, and another of the session\u2019s speakers. \u201cSo now you have something that you can do\u201d to increase access to good-paying jobs and to ensure workers can build meaningful, sustainable careers, she concluded.<\/p>\n Addison\u2019s organization, the Fund for Our Economic Future, in 2022 studied 5,000 Northeast Ohioans to determine the barriers to work that they face. Addison noted that the findings of this study proved similar to those of the Worker Voices Project<\/a>, a separate study by the Federal Reserve.<\/p>\n Speaking during Policy Summit to those findings, Addison said in addition to lacking broadband, people face other barriers to work including inadequate transportation, inaccessible and unaffordable childcare, a lack of mental health support, and a lack of employment opportunities for those previously incarcerated. And these challenges often look \u201cquite the same\u201d regardless of whether people live in urban, suburban, rural, or other places.<\/p>\n What workforce development pros can do<\/p>\n The \u201cecosystems\u201d influencing these matters (transit, childcare, etc.) have different professions and professionals operating within them, but they are interdependent, Addison said. If one fails, another can fail, she explained, citing as a current example the push inside corporate America to do something to increase access to childcare, which can determine whether someone with dependents can go to work<\/a>. \u201cWe always needed to do something about childcare, but now it\u2019s become a crisis because when an enabling piece of infrastructure in our community failed, it impacts another one,\u201d Addison said.<\/p>\n Her call to action is this: Whatever one\u2019s role is in the workforce development realm, be it research, public policy, or something else, work with people whose background you don\u2019t share but whose success is highly dependent on your success, and vice versa. \u201cRight now, we are disparate individuals who really care, who are really smart, and really want to do the work,\u201d she said. \u201cAnd unless we are better resourced to collaborate and do this kind of cross-sector engagement, we\u2019re going to continue to struggle.\u201d<\/p>\n Also, going forward, it\u2019s important to plan and arrange word of mouth to get people who are \u201con the sidelines\u201d into the workforce development pipeline and ultimately employed, Addison said. \u201cThe outreach cannot come from me,\u201d she said. \u201cI am not a credible messenger for the individuals that are currently on the sidelines, but they might have a neighbor or a grandmother or an aunt or a friend. We know with workforce development, when you ask, \u2018How\u2019d you learn about this program?\u2019 it\u2019s almost always word of mouth.\u201d<\/p>\n The plenary session concluded with multiple questions for Orrell and Addison. They included<\/p>\n How can we ensure that the growth of AI does not lead to mass layoffs as people and skills are replaced and updated? Read or watch their answers, beginning on page 11 of the transcript or at 43:35 of the video.<\/p>\n Seeking more workforce development-related insights? Plug a job seeker\u2019s information into this interactive tool<\/a>\u00a0from the Cleveland and Philadelphia Feds that sheds light on career pathways in the US labor market. To help people use the tool, we developed the Workforce Development Practitioner’s Toolkit<\/a>, too. Also, read, watch, or listen to this separate August Fed Talk event<\/a>\u00a0about meeting the workforce needs of in-demand industries in Ohio.<\/p>\n
\n How can more practical resources be created for lifting the untapped workforce, including potential taxpayers who were recently incarcerated, suffering from mental health issues, or coming out of addiction recovery, so they can find meaningful work?
\n Do you think we are being critical enough about AI issues such as its current inability to maintain a high quality in outputs?<\/p>\n