Quantum computing stocks have gone from virtually unknown on Wall Street to all the rage in just a few months. Last December, Alphabet said that its Willow quantum chip had achieved a milestone in quantum computing, solving complex problems in minutes that would take traditional supercomputers 10 septillion years. The news sparked a frenzy for quantum computing stocks<\/a>, which had gained momentum following the election.<\/p>\n Among the winners was Quantum Computing Inc. (NASDAQ: QUBT), also known as QCI, and its stock has soared since Alphabet’s announcement. As the chart below shows, Quantum Computing and peers like Rigetti Computing, IonQ, and D-Wave Quantum\u00a0have all skyrocketed over the last year, following the same trend.<\/p>\n Quantum Computing stock won’t win the title of most creative name in its sector, but it’s the best performing of the four quantum computing stocks over the past year. Some investors believe it could be the next Nvidia, a stock that has jumped 100x over the last decade, recently reaching a market cap of $4 trillion.<\/p>\n Are they right? Let’s see if Quantum Computing’s super surge can continue.<\/p>\n Part of the reason Quantum Computing has been the best performing of the four stocks above is that it’s the smallest one, so it benefited from the same trend as the three others but jumped off the lowest base. It still has the lowest market cap of the group at $3 billion, and its revenue is negligible at this point. In the first quarter, the company brought in just $39,000 in revenue and posted an operating loss of $8.3 million.<\/p>\n The company is pursuing a different goal in quantum computing than its peers above. It’s focused on photonic quantum computing, rather than the supercomputing technologies that companies like IonQ, Rigetti, and Alphabet are researching. QCI achieved an important milestone in the first quarter, completing construction on its Quantum Photonic Chip Foundry in Arizona, which sets it up to meet growing demand for thin film lithium niobate (TFLN) photonic chips.<\/p>\n Management expects revenue to begin to ramp up next year once it begins production at that foundry. At this point, Quantum Computing is still clearly a high-risk stock, though it has enough liquidity to last several years, based on current operations. At the end of the first quarter, the company had $166.4 million in cash and no debt.<\/p>\n Story Continues <\/p>\n Comparing a company like Quantum Computing, which has run-rate revenue<\/a> of less than $1 million, to Nvidia is a stretch, even if the stock is behaving like it. QCI has essentially no revenue, and there’s no proof of concept that the business can work or sufficient or sustainable demand for its product. Still, most breakthrough technologies begin that way, and it took time for Nvidia to get to where it is today.<\/p>\n Nvidia introduced the graphics processing unit (GPU) in 1999, and its defining innovation has iterated, expanded, and evolved many times over since then. However, even back in 1999, Nvidia was much bigger than QCI is today. In the fiscal year ended Jan. 30, 2000, Nvidia reported $374.5 million in revenue in the fiscal year that ended Jan. 30, 2000.<\/p>\n Whether or not QCI can continue to deliver for investors depends on whether quantum computing is truly the next breakthrough technology. Given the surge in the stock above, investors are treating it like it is, though it’s too early to tell.<\/p>\n Keep an eye on how QCI’s new photonic chips do next year when the company intends to ramp up production and how smoothly its production efforts go. If there’s a similar response to what we’ve seen to AI chips, QCI could take one small step toward being the next Nvidia.<\/p>\n Before you buy stock in Quantum Computing, consider this:<\/p>\n The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the\u00a010 best stocks<\/a> for investors to buy now\u2026 and Quantum Computing wasn\u2019t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.<\/p>\n Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation,\u00a0you\u2019d have $665,092!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you\u2019d have $1,050,477!*<\/p>\n Now, it\u2019s worth noting\u00a0Stock Advisor\u2019s total average return is 1,055% \u2014 a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don\u2019t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.<\/p>\n See the 10 stocks \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025<\/p>\n Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Jeremy Bowman<\/a> has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/a> QUBT<\/a> data by YCharts.<\/a> <\/p>\n
Image source: Getty Images. <\/p>\n