![\"Fallout](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/SEI_271693656-80b5.jpg\")
\n\t\tFallout 5 is going to be a long time coming (Bethesda)<\/p>\n
\t\t
\n\t\tFallout 5 is going to be a long time coming (Bethesda)<\/p>\n
Following the anniversary announcements on Fallout<\/a> Day, a reader argues that Microsoft<\/a> should let someone other than Bethesda<\/a> make Fallout 5.<\/p>\n So Fallout Day<\/a> wasn\u2019t worth celebrating, again. If you saw Bethesda\u2019s latest Fallout livestream on Thursday, you\u2019ll know that it started off with a trailer for something called Fallout 4 Anniversary Edition<\/a>, which was cut as if it was remaster \u2013 although they never said what it was. And then later, if you went on the shop site, it became clear it was just the same game as ever in a different box.<\/p>\n They also showed Fallout: New Vegas 15th Anniversary Bundle, for about 30 seconds, which was the same thing but with a ton of pointless merch that jacked up the price and will probably fall apart as soon as look at it. In other words, they did nothing for either anniversary. Fallout Shelter got a bigger update, for its 10th anniversary, which is just tragic.<\/p>\n It\u2019s often forgotten by younger gamers that Bethesda did not invent Fallout. They bought it and their first game was Fallout 3. Now, that was a fine game, don\u2019t get me wrong \u2013 very innovative in its day \u2013 but the idea was not theirs, even though they did reinvent what type of game it is. But now I think it\u2019s time for someone else to give it a go.<\/p>\n Bethesda get a lot of stick from their fans and I\u2019m afraid I\u2019m going to be another of those ungrateful, entitled brats. I loved the Fallout games, and Oblivion and Skyrim<\/a>, but I don\u2019t feel that they\u2019ve done anything good since then, and that even Fallout 4 was badly flawed. Although to be honest, they\u2019ve hardly done anything since then, just Fallout 76 and Starfield<\/a>.<\/p>\n I know modern games take longer to make but one of the big problems with Bethesda is that they are s\u2026 l\u2026 o\u2026 w\u2026 That\u2019s fine if they hit it out of the park every time but they don\u2019t. They are also very bad at keeping up with new technology. They haven\u2019t been anywhere close to state of the art since at least Oblivion, I would say, and they must know everyone keeps complaining about things like facial animation and loading times, but they never do anything about it, almost like they\u2019re punishing fans for even bringing it up.<\/p>\n I may be an entitled fan, but you do get the impression that Bethesda are a bit too quick to believe their own hype, while blinding themselves to their faults. I don\u2019t want to talk about Starfield, as I believe that subject\u2019s been beaten to death, but I would love to sit in on the debrief for that one. Something tells me they did everything they could to convince themselves it wasn\u2019t that bad.<\/p>\n \t\t\t\tExpert, exclusive gaming analysis\t\t\t<\/p>\n Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter<\/a> for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n So, as you might have gathered already, my suggestion is that Microsoft, who own Bethesda, take Fallout off them and give it to other developers to work on. Given the things we\u2019ve been hearing about Microsoft<\/a> lately, all their developers are on the chopping block and I doubt anyone is safe, even Bethesda.<\/p>\n They\u2019ve barely started work on Fallout 5 and yet season 2 of the Amazon TV show is almost out. That show\u2019s not going to be the big new thing forever and will probably be completely over by the time Fallout 5 is out, whether you take it away from Bethesda or not. Because they\u2019ve just wasted too much time by now.<\/p>\n But the other reason they should let someone else try is that they\u2019re just not innovating anymore. Starfield was filled with really old gameplay ideas (why am I picking locks in the 23rd century?) and very old-fashioned seeming dialogue systems. Almost nothing has changed since the Oblivion days, and I wouldn\u2019t put any bets on it being much different for Elder Scrolls 6 or Fallout 5.<\/p>\n The pre-Bethesda games were isometric, turn-based role-players and Bethesda turned them into first person action role-players. That was great but now they\u2019re stuck in that groove and they need to evolve again. Into what I don\u2019t know \u2013 I\u2019m not a games developer \u2013 but to me the obvious answer is to give it to another developer, to try their take on it.<\/p>\n Then Bethesda can concentrate on The Elder Scrolls and make sure the next one is good and that the one after doesn\u2019t take another 15 years. Because if The Elder Scrolls 6 disappoints you know the Microsoft execs are going to come for them.<\/p>\n I class myself as a Bethesda fan, but they have to acknowledge that they\u2019ve been getting things wrong and make changes to their approach. If they don\u2019t make some surgical cuts then Microsoft are going to do it for them\u2026 with a sledgehammer.<\/p>\n By reader Kliney<\/p>\n \t\t The reader\u2019s features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro.<\/p>\n You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@metro.co.uk<\/a> or use our Submit Stuff page<\/a> and you won\u2019t need to send an email.<\/p>\n Arrow Arrow Arrow![\"Fallout](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/SEI_271521003-c8f0.jpg\")
\n\t\tFallout 4 Anniversary Edition \u2013 definitely not a remaster (Bethesda)<\/p>\n
\nMORE: My top 10 scrolling beat \u2018em-ups on Nintendo Switch \u2013 Reader\u2019s Feature<\/a><\/p>\n
\nMORE: Silent Hill f is the game of the generation for me – Reader’s Feature<\/a><\/p>\n
\nMORE: I wish Nintendo would do more remakes for the Switch 2 – Reader\u2019s Feature<\/a><\/p>\n