Bertone, G. & Hooper, D. History of dark matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018).<\/p>\n
Article<\/a>\u00a0 Salucci, P. The distribution of dark matter in galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27, 2 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Blumenthal, G. R., Faber, S. M., Primack, J. R. & Rees, M. J. Formation of galaxies and large scale structure with cold dark matter. Nature 311, 517\u2013525 (1984).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C. S. & White, S. D. M. The evolution of large scale structure in a universe dominated by cold dark matter. Astrophys. J. 292, 371\u2013394 (1985).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Peebles, P. J. E. Large scale background temperature and mass fluctuations due to scale invariant primeval perturbations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 263, L1\u2013L5 (1982).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hinshaw, G. et al. Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological parameter results. Astrophys. J. Supp. Series 208, 19 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Aghanim, N. et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gleyzes, J., Langlois, D., Mancarella, M. & Vernizzi, F. Effective theory of interacting dark energy. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08, 054 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Barkana, R. Possible interaction between baryons and dark-matter particles revealed by the first stars. Nature 555, 71\u201374 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Schewtschenko, J. A. et al. Dark matter\u2013radiation interactions: the structure of Milky Way satellite galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 2282\u20132287 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Diacoumis, J. A. D. & Wong, Y. Y. Y. On the prior dependence of cosmological constraints on some dark matter interactions. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05, 025 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Diamanti, R., Giusarma, E., Mena, O., Archidiacono, M. & Melchiorri, A. Dark Radiation and interacting scenarios. Phys. Rev. D 87, 063509 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Buen-Abad, M. A., Marques-Tavares, G. & Schmaltz, M. Non-Abelian dark matter and dark radiation. Phys. Rev. D 92, 023531 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pettorino, V., Amendola, L., Baccigalupi, C. & Quercellini, C. Constraints on coupled dark energy using CMB data from WMAP and south pole telescope. Phys. Rev. D 86, 103507 (2012).<\/p>\n Pourtsidou, A., Skordis, C. & Copeland, E. J. Models of dark matter coupled to dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 88, 083505 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Costa, A. A., Olivari, L. C. & Abdalla, E. Quintessence with Yukawa Interaction. Phys. Rev. D 92, 103501 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Spergel, D. N. & Steinhardt, P. J. Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3760\u20133763 (2000).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Archidiacono, M., Castorina, E., Redigolo, D. & Salvioni, E. Unveiling dark fifth forces with linear cosmology. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10, 074 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Tulin, S. & Yu, H.-B. Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure. Phys. Rept. 730, 1\u201357 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Behnke, E. et al. Final results of the PICASSO dark matter search experiment. Astropart. Phys. 90, 85\u201392 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Abdelhameed, A. H. et al. First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program. Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Agnes, P. et al. Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide-50. Phys. Rev. D 107, 063001 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Aalbers, J. et al. First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gaskins, J. M. A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter. Contemp. Phys. 57, 496\u2013525 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Conrad, J. & Reimer, O. Indirect dark matter searches in gamma and cosmic rays. Nature Phys. 13, 224\u2013231 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rodr\u00edguez, A. B. et al. Prospects on searches for baryonic dark matter produced in b-hadron decays at LHCb. Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 964 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hayrapetyan, A. et al. Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment. Phys. Rept. 1115, 448 (2025).<\/p>\n Aad, G. et al. The quest to discover supersymmetry at the ATLAS experiment. Phys. Rep. 1116, 261\u2013300 (2025).<\/p>\n Aad, G. et al. Exploration at the high-energy frontier: ATLAS Run 2 searches investigating the exotic jungle beyond the Standard Model. Phys. Rep. 1116, 301\u2013385 (2025).<\/p>\n Ariga, A. et al. FASER\u2019s physics reach for long-lived particles. Phys. Rev. D 99, 095011 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Aaij, R. et al. Search for \\({A}^{{\\prime} }\\to {\\mu }^{+}{\\mu }^{-}\\) decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041801 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Aad, G. et al. ATLAS searches for additional scalars and exotic Higgs boson decays with the LHC Run 2 dataset. Phys. Rep. 1116, 184\u2013260 (2025).<\/p>\n Robertson, A. et al. Observable tests of self-interacting dark matter in galaxy clusters: cosmological simulations with SIDM and baryons. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488, 3646\u20133662 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Eckert, D. et al. Constraints on dark matter self-interaction from the internal density profiles of X-COP galaxy clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 666, A41 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Harvey, D., Chisari, N. E., Robertson, A. & McCarthy, I. G. The impact of self-interacting dark matter on the intrinsic alignments of galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 506, 441\u2013451 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Desmond, H. & Ferreira, P. G. Galaxy morphology rules out astrophysically relevant Hu-Sawicki f(R) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 102, 104060 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Kesden, M. & Kamionkowski, M. Galilean equivalence for galactic dark matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 131303 (2006).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Kaiser, N. Clustering in real space and in redshift space. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 227, 1\u201327 (1987).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hamilton, A. J. S. Linear Redshift Distortions: A Review, 185\u2013275 (Springer, 1998).<\/p>\n Tutusaus, I., Bonvin, C. & Grimm, N. Measurement of the Weyl potential evolution from the first three years of dark energy survey data. Nat. Commun. 15, 9295 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bonvin, C. & Fleury, P. Testing the equivalence principle on cosmological scales. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05, 061 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Castello, S., Zheng, Z., Bonvin, C. & Amendola, L. Testing the equivalence principle across the Universe: a model-independent approach with galaxy multi-tracing. Phys. Rev. D 111, 12 (2025).<\/p>\n Sobral-Blanco, D. & Bonvin, C. Measuring the distortion of time with relativistic effects in large-scale structure. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 519, L39\u2013L44 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Kehagias, A., Nore\u00f1a, J., Perrier, H. & Riotto, A. Consequences of symmetries and consistency relations in the large-scale structure of the universe for non-local bias and modified gravity. Nucl. Phys. B 883, 83\u2013106 (2014).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Creminelli, P., Gleyzes, J., Hui, L., Simonovi\u0107, M. & Vernizzi, F. Single-field consistency relations of large scale structure. Part III: test of the equivalence principle. JCAP 06, 009 (2014).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. DESI Collaboration. https:\/\/www.desi.lbl.gov<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Euclid Survey. Euclid Consortium. https:\/\/www.euclid-ec.org<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Square Kilometer Array Observatory. SKAO. https:\/\/www.skao.int\/en<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Abbott, T. M. C. et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D 105, 023520 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Howlett, C. et al. 2MTF \u2013 VI. Measuring the velocity power spectrum. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 471, 3135\u20133151 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Huterer, D., Shafer, D., Scolnic, D. & Schmidt, F. Testing \u039bCDM at the lowest redshifts with SN Ia and galaxy velocities. JCAP 05, 015 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hudson, M. J. & Turnbull, S. J. The growth rate of cosmic structure from peculiar velocities at low and high redshifts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 751, L30 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Turnbull, S. J. et al. Cosmic flows in the nearby universe from Type Ia Supernovae. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 420, 447\u2013454 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Davis, M. et al. Local gravity versus local velocity: solutions for \u03b2 and nonlinear bias. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 413, 2906 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Song, Y.-S. & Percival, W. J. Reconstructing the history of structure formation using Redshift Distortions. JCAP 10, 004 (2009).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Blake, C. et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): improved cosmic growth measurements using multiple tracers of large-scale structure. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 436, 3089 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Alam, S. et al. Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory. Phys. Rev. D 103, 083533 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Blake, C. et al. The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z < 1. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 425, 405\u2013414 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pezzotta, A. et al. The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS): the growth of structure at 0.5 < z < 1.2 from redshift-space distortions in the clustering of the PDR-2 final sample. Astron. Astrophys. 604, A33 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Okumura, T. et al. The Subaru FMOS galaxy redshift survey (FastSound). IV. New constraint on gravity theory from redshift space distortions at z ~ 1.4. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 68, 38 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zhao, G.-B. et al. The clustering of the SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample: a tomographic measurement of cosmic structure growth and expansion rate based on optimal redshift weights. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 482, 3497\u20133513 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rubin Observatory. LSST. https:\/\/rubinobservatory.org<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Khoury, J. & Weltman, A. Chameleon fields: awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171104 (2004).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hinterbichler, K. & Khoury, J. Symmetron fields: screening long-range forces through local symmetry restoration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 231301 (2010).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Grimm, N., Bonvin, C. & Tutusaus, I. Testing general relativity through the EG statistic using the weyl potential and galaxy velocities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 211004 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Adame, A. G. et al. DESI 2024 V: full-shape galaxy clustering from Galaxies and Quasars. JCAP 09, 008 (2025).<\/p>\n Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19, 716\u2013723 (1974).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Castello, S., Wang, Z., Dam, L., Bonvin, C. & Pogosian, L. Disentangling modified gravity from a dark force with gravitational redshift. Phys. Rev. D 110, 103523 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bottaro, S., Castorina, E., Costa, M., Redigolo, D. & Salvioni, E. Unveiling dark forces with the Large Scale Structure of the Universe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 201002 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wang, Z., Mirpoorian, S. H., Pogosian, L., Silvestri, A. & Zhao, G.-B. New MGCAMB tests of gravity with CosmoMC and Cobaya. JCAP 08, 038 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Chamings, F. N., Avgoustidis, A., Copeland, E. J., Green, A. M. & Pourtsidou, A. Understanding the suppression of structure formation from dark matter-dark energy momentum coupling. Phys. Rev. D 101, 043531 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Aghamousa, A. et al. The DESI experiment part I: science,targeting, and survey design. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1611.00036<\/a> (2016).<\/p>\n Tutusaus, I., Sobral-Blanco, D. & Bonvin, C. Combining gravitational lensing and gravitational redshift to measure the anisotropic stress with future galaxy surveys. Phys. Rev. D 107, 083526 (2023).<\/p>\n Perenon, L. et al. Multi-tasking the growth of cosmological structures. Phys. Dark Univ. 34, 100898 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Amendola, L., Kunz, M. & Sapone, D. Measuring the dark side (with weak lensing). JCAP 0804, 013 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Daniel, S. F., Caldwell, R. R., Cooray, A. & Melchiorri, A. Large scale structure as a probe of gravitational slip. Phys. Rev. D77, 103513 (2008).<\/p>\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0 Bonvin, C. & Pogosian, L. Modified Einstein versus modified Euler for dark matter. Nature Astron. 7, 1127\u20131134 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Archidiacono, M. et al. Constraining dark matter-dark radiation interactions with CMB, BAO, and Lyman-\u03b1. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10, 055 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Castello, S., Grimm, N. & Bonvin, C. Rescuing constraints on modified gravity using gravitational redshift in large-scale structure. Phys. Rev. D 106, 083511 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bertschinger, E. & Zukin, P. Distinguishing modified gravity from dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 78, 024015 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pogosian, L., Silvestri, A., Koyama, K. & Zhao, G.-B. How to optimally parametrize deviations from general relativity in the evolution of cosmological perturbations. Phys. Rev. D 81, 104023 (2010).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Adame, A. G. et al. DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements. JCAP 07, 028 (2025).<\/p>\n Sloan Digital Sky Survey. SDSS Collaboration. https:\/\/www.sdss.org\/<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. WiggleZ Collaboration. https:\/\/wigglez.swin.edu.au\/site\/forward.html<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Satpathy, S. et al. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: on the measurement of growth rate using galaxy correlation functions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, 1369\u20131382 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Schirra, A. P., Quartin, M. & Amendola, L. A model-independent measurement of the expansion and growth rates from BOSS using the FreePower method. Phys. Dark Universe 49, 102033 (2025).<\/p>\n Blanchard, A. et al. Euclid preparation: VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes. Astron. Astrophys. 642, A191 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Amendola, L., Pietroni, M. & Quartin, M. Fisher matrix for the one-loop galaxy power spectrum: measuring expansion and growth rates without assuming a cosmological model. JCAP 11, 023 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Asgari, M. et al. KiDS-1000 cosmology: cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics. Astron. Astrophys. 645, A104 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Abbott, T. M. C. et al. Dark energy survey year 1 results: constraints on extended cosmological models from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D 99, 123505 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Abbott, T. M. C. et al. Dark energy survey year 3 results: constraints on extensions to \u039bCDM with weak lensing and galaxy clustering. Phys. Rev. D 107, 083504 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Grimm, N. Fifth force from fhat and Jhat. Zenodo, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.17078450<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Lewis, A., Challinor, A. & Lasenby, A. Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models. Astrophys. J. 538, 473\u2013476 (2000).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n MATH<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n MATH<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MATH<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n MATH<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n MATH<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bertone, G. & Hooper, D. History of dark matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018). Article\u00a0 ADS\u00a0 CAS\u00a0…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":242725,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[9025,36585,93502,4230,4231,2302,90,56,54,55],"class_list":{"0":"post-242724","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-cosmology","9":"tag-dark-energy-and-dark-matter","10":"tag-general-relativity-and-gravity","11":"tag-humanities-and-social-sciences","12":"tag-multidisciplinary","13":"tag-physics","14":"tag-science","15":"tag-uk","16":"tag-united-kingdom","17":"tag-unitedkingdom"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=242724"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/242724\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/242725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=242724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=242724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=242724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}