Some breeding grounds for capercaillies, golden eagles, golden plovers, greenshanks and red-throated divers have been put under pressure by deer.<\/p>\n
In excessive numbers, deer degrade land<\/a> by trampling over and eating too much vegetation, and stripping bark with their antlers, which can kill trees.<\/p>\n Rampant deer also harm the plants and animals that rely on these habitats, and allow plants they do not eat to dominate, according to the John Muir Trust.<\/p>\n There are thought to be close to a million<\/a> deer in Scotland, with at least 100,000<\/a> culled annually.<\/p>\n Deer pressure on nationally and globally important protected areas is revealed in data we obtained via freedom of information from NatureScot, the Scottish Government\u2019s wildlife agency.<\/p>\n It considers some of the sites affected to be the best remaining representations of Scotland\u2019s \u201cnatural heritage\u201d.<\/p>\n They include the Loch Lomond site used for breeding by capercaillie \u2013 a species on the verge of extinction in Scotland. Their breeding grounds were found to be in an \u201cunfavourable\u201d and \u201cdeclining\u201d condition by NatureScot.<\/p>\n The wildlife agency said deer can damage the nests of ground nesting birds by walking over or eating them, but stressed that deer were unlikely to have been solely responsible for a breeding site to be in poor condition.<\/p>\n Five Caledonian forest sites were under pressure from deer, with all found to be in an \u201cunfavourable\u201d state. They include woodland at Ben Nevis, the Ardgour peninsula, Ballochbuie near Braemar, and Amat Wood \u2013 the largest<\/a> native pinewood in Sutherland.<\/p>\n These five clusters are among the 84 remaining fragments of Caledonian pinewoods, which are at risk of vanishing altogether, according to<\/a> the Trees for Life charity.<\/p>\n In numbers: the impact of deer<\/p>\n NatureScot\u2019s data shows that deer were pressuring 230 of Scotland\u2019s 1,422 sites of special scientific interest<\/a> (SSSIs), 52 of the 243 special areas of conservation<\/a>, five of the 162 special protection areas<\/a>, and two of the 51 \u201cglobally-important\u201d Ramsar wetland sites<\/a>.<\/p>\n SSSIs best represent Scotland\u2019s nature due to their diversity features like plants, animals and habitats, according to NatureScot.<\/p>\n Deer had at least some \u201cnegative\u201d effect on all but 11 parts of these 289 protected sites, harming 415 features including woodlands, forests, and grasslands.<\/p>\n Some 309 of these aspects were in an \u201cunfavourable\u201d condition, while 132 were found to be \u201cfavourable\u201d. Compared to previous assessments, 144 had deteriorated while the remainder had not changed or were recovering.<\/p>\n NatureScot stressed that features can face other pressures beyond deer that contribute to their overall condition.<\/p>\n Scotland and deer numbers<\/p>\n Scotland\u2019s deer herds have risen dramatically over the decades. Estimations cited<\/a> by the Scottish Government found that red deer numbers had doubled from 155,000 to 300,000 between 1959 and 1990.<\/p>\n Today, more than 833,000 \u2013 made up of 500,000 red, 300,000 roe, 25,000 sika and at least 8,000 fallow deer \u2013 have been recorded according to NatureScot<\/a>. But the government pointed<\/a> to 2021 research saying the figure was thought to be \u201cwell on its way\u201d to a million.<\/p>\n The John Muir Trust says<\/a> that, \u201cbroadly speaking\u201d, more than five deer per sq km prevent natural woodland regeneration, while exceeding eight per sq km risks damage to peatlands, which store vast amounts of carbon \u2013 which causes global warming if released.<\/p>\n The Scottish Government accepted a recommendation from the independent Deer Working Group<\/a> that there should be no more than 10 red deer per sq km in large open areas in the Highlands. But it added that appropriate densities can vary depending on the area.<\/p>\n To control the overpopulated animals, which have no surviving natural predators, deer are culled by NatureScot and Forestry and Land Scotland on public land, and land managers and others on private estates. NatureScot says the annual recorded cull is over 100,000, but numbers could be as high as 200,000.<\/p>\n However, it estimates<\/a> that 50,000 more deer must be killed every year to meet nature and biodiversity targets.<\/p>\n Deer control is voluntary, rather than compulsory, but NatureScot has the power to cull deer on behalf of non-compliant landowners \u201cwhen necessary to protect our natural heritage\u201d.<\/p>\n It did so in 2023, killing 160 deer at Loch Choire estate in Sutherland. With 13 per sq km, the animals threatened four designated peatland SSSIs. This cost taxpayer-funded NatureScot \u00a325,000, minus \u00a38,000 it recouped in venison sales.<\/p>\n In April, the government approved<\/a> a compulsory deer control scheme at the estate \u2013 the first time one has ever been used \u2013 in order to protect the SSSIs.<\/p>\n Conservative MSP Edward Mountain said the decline of capercaillie at Loch Lomond \u201ccannot be pinned on the door of deer\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cIneffective predator control of foxes, pine martens and badgers will cause more damage than deer\u2019s hooves and this is clearly evidenced at Abernethy which is run by RSPB and which has the fastest declining population of capercaillie in Scotland,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n RSPB, however, claimed the Abernethy capercaillie population was increasing, albeit \u201cslowly in contrast to most other places in its remaining range\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019ve focussed on habitat improvements including reducing deer numbers, grazing with cattle, and vegetation cutting rather than predator control and this approach seems to be working for us,\u201d said Duncan Orr-Ewing, RSPB\u2019s head of species and land management.<\/p>\n The deer management debate<\/p>\n Politicians, academics and conservationists agree that Scotland\u2019s deer herd must be managed, but there are splits on what the process should look like.<\/p>\n The Scottish Wildlife Trust branded overgrazing by deer \u201ca key blocker in efforts to tackle climate change and reversing nature loss by 2045 \u2013 commitments to which the Scottish Government itself has pledged<\/a>\u201d.<\/p>\n Unless numbers are cut, \u201cwe risk our most special places for wildlife suffering further damage\u201d, said Bruce Wilson, the charity\u2019s head of policy.<\/p>\n \u201cFunded training and support must also be made available to rural communities\u201d, he added.<\/p>\n Green MSP Ariane Burgess said that if Scotland is \u201cserious about reversing nature loss and tackling the climate emergency, we have to get deer densities down to levels that allow woodlands and peatlands to recover\u201d.<\/p>\n Some estates had allowed deer numbers to balloon \u201cjust to guarantee paying clients animals to shoot\u201d, while stalkers who \u201cunderstand the scale of the problem\u201d are \u201cconstrained by the priorities of the landowners and land managers who call the shots,\u201d she alleged.<\/p>\n Scottish Land and Estates (SLE) claimed 80 per cent of deer management was voluntarily\u00a0handled by private landowners \u201coften at a net cost\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cWhere deer are causing damage, NatureScot have powers to intervene\u2026 and SLE supports the principle of having a regulatory backstop\u201d, said Ross Ewing, director of moorland and special projects. \u201cHowever, an approach predicated on incentives is more likely to enable more effective deer management to take place.\u201d<\/p>\n The Association of Deer Management Groups said that while it was working with NatureScot to count, manage and assess the impacts of deer, \u201cthe solution isn\u2019t simple\u201d.<\/p>\n Its chair, Tom Turnbull, said herd numbers may be growing outwith the Highlands \u201cwhere divergent land management objectives, more fragmented ownership and increased forestry and woodland cover means deer management presents even greater challenges.\u201d<\/p>\n Davy McCracken, head of SRUC\u2019s hill and mountain research said the issue is not \u201cas straightforward as simply reducing deer numbers\u201d and \u201crequires a coordinated approach to build local partnerships and base management decisions on solid ecological evidence\u201d.<\/p>\n Scottish environmental policy has been \u201cencouraging a greater focus on sustainable deer management in recent years\u201d and would be buoyed by legally binding biodiversity targets set out in the Natural Environment Bill<\/a> going through parliament, he added.<\/p>\n NatureScot agreed the bill would \u201cfurther modernise, clarify and streamline deer management legislation in Scotland, fulfilling many of the recommendations of the independent Deer Working Group\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cThese changes will better support efforts to restore priority areas such as native woodlands and peatlands by reducing the impacts of deer grazing and trampling,\u201d said a spokesperson. They emphasised that NatureScot puts a \u201cstrong focus\u201d on reducing deer impacts in \u201cpriority areas\u201d, including protected ones.<\/p>\n The spokesperson added: \u201dSustainable deer management is vital if we are to bring populations in balance with the rest of nature and effectively tackle the twin crises of biodiversity loss and climate change.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"Deer\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/iStock-628133040-1200x657.jpg\")
Red deer roam a Scottish hillside. Credit: GeorgeAPhilip<\/a><\/p>\n