{"id":259460,"date":"2025-11-13T00:07:09","date_gmt":"2025-11-13T00:07:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/259460\/"},"modified":"2025-11-13T00:07:09","modified_gmt":"2025-11-13T00:07:09","slug":"bbc-prepared-to-apologise-to-trump-to-resolve-billion-dollar-legal-threat-bbc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/259460\/","title":{"rendered":"BBC prepared to apologise to Trump to resolve billion-dollar legal threat | BBC"},"content":{"rendered":"

The BBC is prepared to formally apologise to Donald Trump as part of its efforts to resolve his billion-dollar legal threat<\/a> over its editing of one of his speeches, the Guardian understands.<\/p>\n

However, figures at the corporation are also minded to be robust in defending its journalism<\/a> in the face of allegations from Trump that it made \u201cfalse, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements\u201d about him.<\/p>\n

The BBC\u2019s leadership is facing a looming deadline over how to reply to Trump\u2019s legal threat, filed in a Florida court on Wednesday according to the White House. It follows the editing of a Trump speech<\/a> in an edition of Panorama, which was a significant factor in the resignation of director general Tim Davie and Deborah Turness, its head of news.<\/p>\n

Beyond a fresh apology, a critical question remains how far the BBC<\/a> goes in defending its reporting more generally in the US, given claims from Trump\u2019s allies that it publishes \u201cfake news\u201d in relation to him.<\/p>\n

Its legal team has been drawing up its response to the complaint. It relates to an edition of Panorama broadcast last year, which spliced together clips of a Trump speech made on 6 January 2021. It has been accused of making it appear that he directly encouraged the US Capitol attack later that day.<\/p>\n

The spliced clip suggested that Trump told the crowd: \u201cWe\u2019re going to walk down to the Capitol and I\u2019ll be there with you, and we fight. We fight like hell.\u201d The words were taken from sections of his speech almost an hour apart.<\/p>\n

The Guardian understands that given an apology for the edit<\/a> has been made by the BBC\u2019s chair, Samir Shah, senior figures see no reason why a more personal apology cannot be made to the president in its official response to the legal threat. The corporation has concluded that the edit \u201cgave the impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action\u201d.<\/p>\n

People familiar with the discussions over how to respond also said the apology meant it could push back at any wider criticisms of its journalism of the US in relation to the coverage of Trump. A US congressional committee found that Trump failed to act to stop his supporters from attacking the Capitol.<\/p>\n

Now that Trump has launched legal action, according to the White House on Wednesday, the BBC leadership faces an invidious choice over a public battle with the US president or making a payment that will be seen as politically toxic, given it is publicly funded through the licence fee.<\/p>\n

The BBC does have insurance covering legal challenges to its journalism. However, insiders acknowledge that there is always a pressure on legal costs should litigation stretch on for months.<\/p>\n

Trump has doubled down on his legal threat, stating he felt he had \u201can obligation\u201d to sue the BBC. \u201cI guess I have to,\u201d he told Fox News. \u201cThey defrauded the public and they\u2019ve admitted it. This is within one of our great allies, supposedly our great ally.\u201d<\/p>\n

He added: \u201cThey showed me the results of how they butchered it up. It was very dishonest and the head man quit and a lot of the other people quit.\u201d<\/p>\n

skip past newsletter promotion<\/a><\/p>\n

Get the day\u2019s headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning<\/p>\n

Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com<\/a> to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy<\/a>. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy<\/a> and Terms of Service<\/a> apply.<\/p>\n

Legal experts have questioned the Trump team\u2019s chances of victory in any court case, given Florida\u2019s liberal libel laws and the fact the Panorama episode was not available in the state. The broadcast was too long ago to take legal action in the UK. Trump would also have to prove he was damaged by the programme.<\/p>\n

Trump has regularly been using lawsuits to attack criticism in the media, with several major networks opting to settle claims with one eye on their commercial interests. Trump also has outstanding cases against the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal.<\/p>\n

The edit was one of the criticisms of the BBC raised in a memo by Michael Prescott, a former independent external adviser to the BBC\u2019s editorial guidelines and standards committee. He left the role in the summer.<\/p>\n

There is anger within the BBC over the Trump edit. However, there is also concern over the political nature of the Prescott memo, which outlines a series of claims of liberal bias relating to issues emerging over several years. The BBC has said some of the issues are historical, while serious action has already been taken in relation to others.<\/p>\n

Prescott has said he had no political motivations in raising his concerns.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The BBC is prepared to formally apologise to Donald Trump as part of its efforts to resolve his…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":259461,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[49,50,51,47,52,48],"class_list":{"0":"post-259460","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-headlines","8":"tag-headlines","9":"tag-news","10":"tag-top-news","11":"tag-top-stories","12":"tag-topnews","13":"tag-topstories"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259460"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259460\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/259461"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}