![\"OpenAI](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/openai-researcher-quits-hiding-truth.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\t<\/p>\n
\t\t\tIllustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins \/ Futurism. Source: Chip Somodevilla \/ Getty Images<\/p>\n
OpenAI has long published research on the potential safety and economic impact of its own technology.<\/p>\n
Now, Wired reports<\/a> that the Sam Altman-led company is becoming more \u201cguarded\u201d about publishing research that paints an inconvenient truth: that AI could be bad for the economy.<\/p>\n The perceived censorship has become such a point of frustration that at least two OpenAI employees working on its economic research team have quit the company, according to four Wired sources.<\/p>\n One of these employees was economics researcher Tom Cunningham. In his final parting message shared internally, he wrote that the economic research team was veering away from doing real research and instead acting like its employer\u2019s propaganda arm.<\/p>\n Shortly after Cunningham\u2019s departure, OpenAI\u2019s chief strategy officer Jason Kwon sent a memo saying the company should \u201cbuild solutions,\u201d not just publish research on \u201chard subjects.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cMy POV on hard subjects is not that we shouldn\u2019t talk about them,\u201d Kwon wrote on Slack. \u201cRather, because we are not just a research institution, but also an actor in the world (the leading actor in fact) that puts the subject of inquiry (AI) into the world, we are expected to take agency for the outcomes.\u201d<\/p>\n The reported censorship, or at least hostility towards pursuing work that paints AI in an unflattering light, is emblematic of OpenAI\u2019s shift away from its non-profit and ostensibly altruist roots as it transforms instead into a global economic juggernaut.\u00a0<\/p>\n When OpenAI was founded in 2016, it championed open-source AI and research. Today its models are close-sourced, and the company has restructured itself into a for-profit, public benefit corporation. Exactly when is unclear, but reports also suggest that the private entity is planning to go public<\/a> at a $1 trillion valuation, anticipated to be one of the largest initial public offerings of all time.<\/p>\n Though its non-profit arm remains nominally in control, OpenAI has garnered billions of dollars in investment, has signed deals that could bring in hundreds of billions of more, while also entering contracts to spend just as dizzying amounts of money. OpenAI gets AI chipmaker to agree to invest up to $100 billion<\/a> in it on one end, and says it will pay Microsoft up to $250 billion<\/a> for its Azure cloud services on the other.<\/p>\n With that sort of money hanging in the balance, it has billions of reasons why it wouldn\u2019t want to release findings that shake the public\u2019s already wavering belief in its tech \u2014 as many fear its potential to destroy or replace jobs, not to mention talk of an AI bubble or existential risks to humankind from the tech.<\/p>\n OpenAI\u2019s economic research is currently overseen by Aaron Chatterji, According to Wired, Chatterji led a report released in September which showed how people around the world used ChatGPT, framing it as proof of how it created economic value by increasing productivity. If that seems suspiciously glowing, an economist who previously worked with OpenAI and chose to remain anonymous alleged to Wired that it was increasingly publishing work that glorifies its own tech.<\/p>\n Cunningham isn\u2019t the only employee to leave the company over ethical concerns of its direction. William Saunders, a former member of OpenAI\u2019s now-defunct \u201cSuperalignment\u201d team, said he quit<\/a> after realizing it was \u201cprioritizing getting out newer, shinier products\u201d over user safety. After departing last year<\/a>, former safety researcher Steven Adler has repeatedly criticized OpenAI for its risky approach to AI development, highlighting how ChatGPT appeared to be driving its users into mental crises and delusional spirals<\/a>. Wired noted that OpenAI\u2019s former head of policy research Miles Brundage complained after leaving last year that it became \u201chard\u201d to publish research \u201con all the topics that are important to me.\u201d<\/p>\n