{"id":368904,"date":"2026-01-14T07:19:07","date_gmt":"2026-01-14T07:19:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/368904\/"},"modified":"2026-01-14T07:19:07","modified_gmt":"2026-01-14T07:19:07","slug":"wes-breaks-cover-to-challenge-keir-without-even-mentioning-him-john-crace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/368904\/","title":{"rendered":"Wes breaks cover to challenge Keir \u2013 without even mentioning him | John Crace"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">There must be a happy medium somewhere. Some ministers you can\u2019t get to shut up, others refuse to say a word. On balance, Keir Starmer probably prefers it when they say next to nothing. On the grounds there is probably less that can go wrong. He likes it best when he is the one doing the talking as he is more in control of the message. The only trouble is, the public often prefer it when it\u2019s someone else doing the talking. Especially when that person is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/wes-streeting\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" data-component=\"auto-linked-tag\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Wes Streeting<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">OK, so we all know that Streeting can be a bit annoying. No one is ever going to love Wes in quite the same way Wes loves Wes. The self-regard is total. And he has never made any secret that his ambition goes well beyond being health secretary. He wants the top job and will be among the first to put his name forward when Starmer decides \u2013 or has it decided for him \u2013 that enough is enough. And of course, Wes is constantly plotting. How do we know? Because he is breathing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">But here\u2019s the thing. Despite all this \u2013 or maybe even because of it \u2013 Streeting is one of the better performers on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/labour\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" data-component=\"auto-linked-tag\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Labour<\/a> frontbench. He believes in himself and he believes in the NHS and has no qualms about trying to make a good news story out of both. Above all, he looks like he cares. As if he is up for the fight of making the health service better again.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Streeting is a natural salesman. When <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/nov\/13\/briefings-against-ministers-didnt-come-from-downing-street-says-starmer\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">team Starmer briefed against Wes shortly before Christmas<\/a>, insisting he was trying to stage a coup to oust him from No 10 \u2013 Keir still isn\u2019t quite sure how that inquiry into the leaks Keir started is going \u2013 the whole thing backfired. Because on the media round the very next day, Wes did a star turn. Not only deflecting the whole thing as paranoia, but showing everyone why he would make a much better leader than Starmer. Confident, clear and assured. Here was a genuine prime minister in waiting. If people hadn\u2019t seen Wes as a successor to Starmer before this, they did now. This was Wes leading Wes\u2019s charmed life.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Since then, Streeting has kept more of a low profile. A spell on the sidelines doing a conspicuous show of loyalty wouldn\u2019t do his long-term chances any harm. But with Starmer\u2019s popularity ratings still flatlining and the questions over his tenure in Downing Street becoming more persistent, Wes had decided that it was time to break cover again. And it was done with some subtlety. No great LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE klaxon. There again, maybe it\u2019s a sign of Keir\u2019s weakness that even a simple statement of the obvious can be seen as a threat.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Not so long ago, <a href=\"https:\/\/labourlist.org\/2025\/12\/starmer-my-experience-now-as-prime-minister-is-of-frustration\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Starmer gave a speech in which he had a moan about the levers of power being frustratingly slow<\/a>. That civil servants were too comfortable in the tepid bath of the status quo. This was followed up by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2026\/jan\/02\/downing-street-has-only-itself-to-blame-for-lack-of-grip-on-whitehall-say-experts\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">an article written by one of his former staffers<\/a> who also moaned about the speed of government. Neither appeared to realise that the public weren\u2019t that interested in the internal workings of the administration. They just wanted something to change. They were fed up with being broke and no public services working properly. Having to listen to the powerful saying how powerless they felt made people want to kick something.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Wes, though, understood the public\u2019s mood perfectly. So in a keynote speech to the Institute for Government\u2019s conference on Tuesday morning, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2026\/jan\/13\/wes-streeting-excuses-culture-blaming-civil-service\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">he set about challenging his own government\u2019s orthodoxy<\/a>. It wasn\u2019t good enough just to complain about the levers of power, he said. The government had been elected to improve public services and that\u2019s what he was determined to do. It was up to him and other ministers to change the system if the system wasn\u2019t working. He didn\u2019t mention Starmer once. He didn\u2019t need to. Everyone understood the subtext. Wes was being Wes. He was ready whenever the call might come. He didn\u2019t mind waiting a little while longer. Time was on his side.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Later in the morning, we were treated to the more monosyllabic \u2013 borderline mute \u2013 kind of minister that Starmer much prefers. The type of ministerial performance that the public rightly detest. The junior housing minister Matthew Pennycook had been summoned to the Commons to answer an urgent question brought by Tory shadow minister Alicia Kearns on the proposals for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2025\/dec\/02\/uk-government-delays-china-super-embassy-january\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the new Chinese embassy<\/a> near the City of London. The Daily Telegraph had been shown the unredacted plans, which showed there were 208 secret rooms and a hidden bunker with extractor fans little more than a metre or so away from fibre optic cables carrying sensitive financial and personal data. Ideal for hacking.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Now it\u2019s fair to say that if the plans were being considered by a Tory government \u2013 a decision is expected in a week\u2019s time \u2013 then Pennycook might have had quite a lot to say on the subject. Along the lines of falling over backwards to accommodate a hostile and authoritarian state. But all this was happening on Labour\u2019s watch and so Pennycook had taken a vow of silence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Now, it maybe be harsh to pick Matthew out as personally responsible. He was just the messenger. The fall guy sent out because neither his boss \u2013 the housing, communities and local government secretary, Steve Reed \u2013 nor the security minister, Dan Jarvis, felt quite brave enough to front this one up. So the janitor was sent out. And Pennycook died a thousand deaths.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">He\u2019s not the most self-aware of men, but even he could sense that things weren\u2019t going well for him. He could hardly not. It wasn\u2019t just the Tories and the Lib Dems who had him in their sights. Every single Labour backbencher was angry that the proposed embassy looked like it was getting the go-ahead just to keep in with the Chinese. Just imagine the Chinese doing the same for us. You can\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cIt would be inappropriate to comment on this case,\u201d Pennycook said time and time again as MPs raised every objection from data theft to bounties and transnational killings. Matthew was unmoved. \u201cNo decision had been made but all considerations are being \u2026 er, considered.\u201d It was a graceless performance. I hope he reckons it was worth it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"There must be a happy medium somewhere. Some ministers you can\u2019t get to shut up, others refuse to&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":368905,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,57,58,50,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-368904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-united-kingdom","tag-gb","tag-great-britain","tag-greatbritain","tag-news","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=368904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368904\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/368905"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=368904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=368904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=368904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}