Tech companies have been meeting government ministers at a rate of more than once per working day, enjoying high-level political access that dwarfs that of child safety and copyright campaigners, who called the pattern \u201cshocking\u201d and \u201cdisturbing\u201d.<\/p>\n
Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and Elon Musk\u2019s X, whose Grok AI<\/a> image generator has sparked outrage with its sexualised images of women and children, were among the US tech companies holding hundreds of meetings with people at the heart of government, a Guardian investigation has found.<\/p>\n Google, the $4tn California company, had the greatest access, with more than 100 ministerial meetings, according to an analysis of meeting records for the two years to October 2025, which campaigners said showed the tech industry\u2019s \u201ccapture\u201d of government<\/a>. The industry lobbying group Tech UK met ministers at the rate of more than once every eight working days.<\/p>\n X attended 13 meetings, a small proportion of the overall number, but still more than the child safety campaign group the NSPCC or the Molly Rose Foundation, founded by the family of 14-year-old Molly Russell who killed herself after viewing harmful online content.<\/p>\n \u201cThe frequency of meetings between government and big tech and their advocates is astounding and points to the incredible power imbalance at stake when it comes to protecting children online,\u201d said Andy Burrows, the chief executive of the Molly Rose Foundation.<\/p>\n Molly Russell, two years before she died. Photograph: Family handout\/PA<\/p>\n The government defended its position, saying \u201cregular engagement with technology companies is vital to delivering economic growth and transforming public services\u201d. Campaigners said the government should stop \u201cbending the knee to US big tech companies\u201d and that the figures revealed an \u201cincredible power imbalance\u201d when it came to protecting children online.<\/p>\n There has been growing controversy over X\u2019s Grok AI tool, and a resurgence<\/a> in the campaign for the government to follow Australia and ban social media for under-16s, which is opposed by tech companies. In the UK, 84% of people are concerned<\/a> ministers will prioritise tech company partnerships over the public interest when it comes to AI regulation.<\/p>\n Dame Chi Onwurah, the Labour chair of the science and technology select committee, said the findings underscored \u201cthe reality that these firms have turnovers larger than the GDP of many countries, and their ability to influence stands in stark contrast to that of their users, our constituents, or those campaigning to make the internet safer\u201d.<\/p>\n She said it was \u201ccrucial for big tech to be accountable to parliament \u2013 something that the disturbing recent news about \u2018nudification\u2019 tools has only underlined further\u201d.<\/p>\n Chi Onwurah MP said it was crucial that big tech was accountable to parliament. Photograph: Richard Gardner\/Rex\/Shutterstock<\/p>\n The technology companies and their lobbyists attended at least 639 meetings with ministers compared with just 75 meetings attended by the organisations and campaigners fighting for greater protections for children online, such as the NSPCC.<\/p>\n The tech firms\u2019 access was also more than three times greater than that of organisations and campaigners seeking to protect creatives\u2019 copyrighted works from being mined to build AI models, a development that figures including Elton John and Kazuo Ishiguro have said risks giving away artists\u2019 \u201clifeblood\u201d.<\/p>\n