{"id":394977,"date":"2026-01-28T12:35:12","date_gmt":"2026-01-28T12:35:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/394977\/"},"modified":"2026-01-28T12:35:12","modified_gmt":"2026-01-28T12:35:12","slug":"hotel-la-tour-supreme-court-ruling-final-confirmation-on-vat-recovery-for-share-sale-adviser-fees-sales-taxes-vat-gst","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/394977\/","title":{"rendered":"Hotel La Tour Supreme Court Ruling: Final Confirmation On VAT Recovery For Share Sale Adviser Fees &#8211; Sales Taxes: VAT, GST"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: <\/p>\n<p>                    &#13;<br \/>\n                            within Environment topic(s)&#13;<br \/>\n                            in United Kingdom&#13;<br \/>\n                            with readers working within the Banking &amp; Credit industries&#13;<\/p>\n<p>In a unanimous judgment, the UK Supreme Court has given final&#13;<br \/>\nconfirmation that VAT incurred on adviser fees connected with an&#13;<br \/>\nexempt share sale is not recoverable, endorsing the Court of&#13;<br \/>\nAppeal&#8217;s strict application of the &#8220;direct and immediate&#13;<br \/>\nlink&#8221; test. The decision brings finality to an area that had&#13;<br \/>\ngenerated uncertainty following earlier tribunal decisions.<\/p>\n<p>The case concerned Hotel La Tour Ltd (HLT), which sold the&#13;<br \/>\nshares in its subsidiary, Hotel La Tour Birmingham Ltd (HLTB), an&#13;<br \/>\nentity owning a hotel. The sale was undertaken to raise funds for&#13;<br \/>\nthe development of a new hotel business that would carry on VATable&#13;<br \/>\nactivities. In connection with the share sale, HLT incurred VAT on&#13;<br \/>\na range of professional services, including legal, financial, tax&#13;<br \/>\nand commercial advice aimed at identifying buyers and maximising&#13;<br \/>\nsale proceeds.<\/p>\n<p>HLT sought to recover the input VAT on those adviser fees,&#13;<br \/>\narguing that the costs were sufficiently linked to its wider&#13;<br \/>\nVATable activities. HMRC disagreed, contending that the costs were&#13;<br \/>\ndirectly attributable to the VAT exempt sale of shares and that the&#13;<br \/>\nVAT was therefore irrecoverable.<\/p>\n<p>A high-level summary of the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision is set&#13;<br \/>\nout below. For further detail on the background and earlier&#13;<br \/>\ndecisions, please see our prior <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaq.com\/redirection.asp?article_id=1736860&amp;company_id=7032&amp;redirectaddress=https:\/\/www.proskauer.com\/newsletter\/uk-tax-round-up-may-2024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">UK Tax Round Up<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court confirmed that the correct approach to&#13;<br \/>\ndetermining input VAT recovery is a strict two-stage test. The&#13;<br \/>\nfirst question is whether the costs have a direct and immediate&#13;<br \/>\nlink with a specific transaction constituting an economic activity.&#13;<br \/>\nOnly if no such link can be identified should consideration be&#13;<br \/>\ngiven to whether the costs instead relate to the taxpayer&#8217;s&#13;<br \/>\ngeneral economic activity. In doing so, the Court expressly&#13;<br \/>\nrejected the &#8220;modified approach&#8221; previously adopted by&#13;<br \/>\nthe First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal, under which VAT&#13;<br \/>\nrecovery had been permitted by reference to the intended use of the&#13;<br \/>\nshare sale proceeds.<\/p>\n<p>Applying that analysis, the Supreme Court agreed with the Court&#13;<br \/>\nof Appeal that the adviser fees incurred by HLT had a direct and&#13;<br \/>\nimmediate link with the exempt sale of the HLTB shares. As a&#13;<br \/>\nresult, the VAT incurred on those fees was not recoverable and it&#13;<br \/>\nwas unnecessary to consider any wider connection with HLT&#8217;s&#13;<br \/>\ntaxable activities. The Court also rejected arguments based on VAT&#13;<br \/>\ngrouping and the Kretztechnik case, confirming that&#13;<br \/>\ndisregarded intra-group supplies do not alter the character of a&#13;<br \/>\nshare sale or the attribution of costs incurred in carrying it out.&#13;<br \/>\nThe judgment therefore closes the door on arguments that adviser&#13;<br \/>\ncosts incurred on an exempt share sale can be treated as general&#13;<br \/>\noverheads simply because the sale is undertaken to fund taxable&#13;<br \/>\nactivities.<\/p>\n<p>The decision confirms that VAT recovery on adviser fees incurred&#13;<br \/>\nin connection with a share sale will be determined primarily by the&#13;<br \/>\nnature of the transaction giving rise to the costs, rather than the&#13;<br \/>\ncommercial purpose of the transaction or the use of the sale&#13;<br \/>\nproceeds. While the scope for VAT recovery in this context remains&#13;<br \/>\nnarrow, careful scoping of adviser mandates may still be important&#13;<br \/>\nto ensure that costs genuinely attributable to taxable activities&#13;<br \/>\nare not inadvertently treated as part of an exempt share sale. For&#13;<br \/>\nbusinesses undertaking share disposals, the judgment underscores&#13;<br \/>\nthe importance of early VAT analysis, as irrecoverable VAT on&#13;<br \/>\nadviser fees should be factored into transaction planning and&#13;<br \/>\npricing from the outset.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-content__main-title\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mondaq.com\/redirection.asp?article_id=1736860&amp;company_id=7032&amp;redirectaddress=https:\/\/www.proskauer.com\/blog\/hotel-la-tour-supreme-court-ruling-final-confirmation-on-vat-recovery-for-share-sale-adviser-fees\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Hotel La Tour Supreme Court Ruling: Final&#13;<br \/>\nConfirmation on VAT Recovery for Share Sale Adviser Fees<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The content of this article is intended to provide a general&#13;<br \/>\nguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought&#13;<br \/>\nabout your specific circumstances.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: &#13; within Environment topic(s)&#13; in United Kingdom&#13; with readers working within the&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":20115,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,57,58,50,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-394977","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-united-kingdom","tag-gb","tag-great-britain","tag-greatbritain","tag-news","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/394977","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=394977"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/394977\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20115"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=394977"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=394977"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=394977"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}