{"id":395447,"date":"2026-01-28T18:36:07","date_gmt":"2026-01-28T18:36:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/395447\/"},"modified":"2026-01-28T18:36:07","modified_gmt":"2026-01-28T18:36:07","slug":"tory-peers-punishment-for-fiddling-expenses-criticised-as-too-lenient-house-of-lords","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/395447\/","title":{"rendered":"Tory peer\u2019s punishment for fiddling expenses criticised as too lenient | House of Lords"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Campaigners have criticised as too lenient the punishment handed to a Conservative hereditary peer found to have broken the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/lords\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" data-component=\"auto-linked-tag\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">House of Lords<\/a> rules for the second time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">In a report published on Wednesday, the House of Lords concluded that the Earl of Shrewsbury had fiddled his expenses and had done so in an \u201cunacceptably casual\u201d way. The lords\u2019 authorities are intending to suspend him from the upper chamber for two weeks.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">His misconduct occurred just three months after returning to the Lords from a nine-month suspension for lobbying for a commercial company that he was working for. It was one of the biggest punishments ever imposed on a peer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Campaigners at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spotlightcorruption.org\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Spotlight on Corruption<\/a> said his conduct showed \u201ca deeply worrying disregard for the rules\u201d and that there needed to be real consequences for those who repeatedly offend.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The House of Lords investigated the peer, whose full name is Charles Henry John Benedict Crofton Chetwynd Chetwynd-Talbot, after the Guardian <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/may\/07\/earl-of-shrewsbury-faces-questions-over-erroneous-travel-expenses-claims\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">revealed he had claimed, from public funds, travel expenses<\/a> that he had not incurred.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Shrewsbury, 73, used a publicly funded first-class rail ticket to attend a board meeting of a company of which he was a non-executive director. In a leaked email he wrote to fellow directors that the \u201cgovernment pays\u201d for his travel to the meeting.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">He is the fifth peer who the House of Lords <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2025\/nov\/24\/house-of-lords-peers-richard-dannatt-david-evans-suspended-breaking-lobbying-rules\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">has concluded have broken its rules<\/a> following the Guardian\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/series\/the-lords-debate\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">months-long investigation<\/a> examining the commercial interests of peers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">In his report, Martin Jelley, the House of Lords standards commissioner, decided that the peer, who has been in the Lords since 1981, had wrongly used a first-class rail pass that should only have funded his parliamentary work.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The peer had used the ticket to travel part of his journey from London to Liverpool to attend a board meeting of a property development firm, Cheshire Land, in January 2024. He gave differing accounts to the standards commissioner.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The peer had also claimed for four car journeys that he could not have made. Jelley said: \u201cHis approach to his mileage claims was unacceptably casual.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The House of Lords committee in charge of policing peers\u2019 conduct accepted: \u201cThe sums involved in this case were small (just under \u00a3200), and Lord Shrewsbury was quick to acknowledge his wrongdoing, offer a full apology, and reimburse the house. There was no evidence of deliberate dishonesty.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The conduct committee said a \u201cshort period of suspension\u201d was merited, adding: \u201cAlthough the previous breach had nothing to do with allowances, a common feature of both cases was Lord Shrewsbury\u2019s failure to maintain a clear distinction between his parliamentary and business activities.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Shrewsbury had been banned from the Lords for nine months in 2023 after he was paid \u00a357,000 to lobby ministers and officials by a healthcare company in what was <a href=\"https:\/\/publications.parliament.uk\/pa\/ld5803\/ldselect\/ldcond\/120\/120.pdf\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">judged by the Lords\u2019 watchdog to be a \u201clucrative relationship\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The House of Lords\u2019 conduct committee had judged on that occasion <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/2022\/dec\/16\/watchdog-orders-suspension-of-two-peers-over-cash-for-parliamentary-advice\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">that his misconduct was \u201cextremely serious\u201d<\/a> and had damaged the reputation of the upper chamber.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Kamila Kingstone, senior campaigner at Spotlight on Corruption, said: \u201cThis case shows a deeply worrying disregard for the rules that protect public money.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cIntentionally using parliamentary resources for private business, then being \u2018unacceptably casual\u2019 about false mileage claims, damages trust in the House of Lords and reinforces the perception that some peers believe the rules do not apply to them.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cComing so soon after a previous suspension, this breach underlines the need for tougher enforcement and real consequences when standards are repeatedly ignored.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Campaigners have criticised as too lenient the punishment handed to a Conservative hereditary peer found to have broken&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":395448,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,57,58,50,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-395447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-united-kingdom","tag-gb","tag-great-britain","tag-greatbritain","tag-news","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=395447"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/395447\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/395448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=395447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=395447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=395447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}