Samuel Pepys\u2019s diary, which covers 1660 to 1669, is regarded as one of the great classic texts in the English language. Words spill out of Pepys \u2013 1.25m of them \u2013 as he bustles around London, building a successful career as a naval administrator while navigating the double trauma of the plague and the Great Fire of London. Historians have long gone to the diary for details of middle-class life during the mid\u201117th century: the seamy streets, the watermen, the taverns and, as Pepys moves up the greasy pole, the court and the king. Best of all is his eye for the picturesque detail: the way, for instance, on the morning of 4 September 1666, as fire licks around his house, Pepys buries a choice parmesan cheese in the garden with the intention of keeping it safe.<\/p>\n
Not all of the diary is in English, though. Quite a lot of it is in French (or rather Franglais), Latin, Spanish and a curious mashup of all three. Pepys increasingly resorted to this home-brewed polyglot whenever the subject of sex came up, which was often. Indeed, sex \u2013 chasing it, having it, worrying about getting it again \u2013 dominated Pepys\u2019s waking life and haunted his dreams, many of them nightmares. Putting these anguished passages in a garbled form not only lessened the chance of servants snooping, but also served to protect him from his own abiding sense of shame. As an extra layer of concealment, Pepys wrote \u201cmy Journall\u201d using tachygraphy, an early form of shorthand.<\/p>\n
While Pepys\u2019s dark side has long been known, it is something else to be confronted with the evidence laid out quite so starkly<\/p>\n
Pepys\u2019s diaries were published in bowdlerised form in the 19th century, and it was not until the 1970s that they became available in 11 unexpurgated volumes. Even then, explains Guy de la B\u00e9doy\u00e8re, there were many transcription errors and, crucially, no attempt was made to translate the coded passages into English. Historians knew about them, of course, not least because all you needed was a bit of classroom French and Latin to work out their meaning. On 25 March 1668, Pepys records that he has given \u201cMrs Daniels\u201d eight pairs of gloves \u201cfor tocar my prick con her hand\u201d, which is hardly likely to keep anyone guessing for very long.<\/p>\n
All the same, it has been easy to lose sight of the sexual thread of Pepys\u2019s diary amid all the chatter about navy ships and expensive cheese. Which is why, for the first time, De la B\u00e9doy\u00e8re has gone back to the original manuscript and translated all of Pepys\u2019s coded entries, publishing them end-to-end with only a minimum of contextual information. The result is an extraordinarily detailed snapshot of life seen through the eyes of a man for whom no day was complete unless he had managed to fondle at least one woman\u2019s \u201cmameles\u201d (breasts) on his way to or from work.<\/p>\n
In the past, people have blamed Pepys\u2019s bad behaviour on the Restoration. These were the years when the dour pieties of Oliver Cromwell had been replaced by Charles II\u2019s permissive libertarianism. But there is much more \u2013 and much worse \u2013 to the occluded parts of Pepys\u2019s diary than mere bawdiness. On 3 February 1664, for example, he is travelling in a carriage down Ludgate Hill when he witnesses three men raping a woman and wishes he could join in. On 1 December 1660, he beats his maid Jane savagely with a broom, though it is clear that he is eyeing her up for a future assignation. He often uses the words \u201ctowsing\u201d and \u201ctumbling\u201d to describe what he is doing with women which sounds jolly and bucolic until De la B\u00e9doy\u00e8re explains that these terms are euphemisms for violence.<\/p>\n
The only occasion on which Pepys might hold back was if he knew a woman was single, which would make any pregnancy impossible to explain away. (It was a mercy that he didn\u2019t realise that an earlier operation for a bladder stone had probably left him sterile.) For that reason, he badgered any girl he wanted to sleep with regularly to get married, so he could carry on regardless. As news of his behaviour got around, so others would try to exploit it. On 11 August 1665, an old waterman called Delkes presented Pepys with his daughter-in-law, who was willing to sleep with him in return for a guarantee that her husband would not be pressed into naval service.<\/p>\n
And then there was his marriage. Pepys had wed Elizabeth when she was just 14. He was proud of her beauty, congratulating himself on how much prettier she was than the many grand ladies at court whom he encountered on his way to becoming secretary to the navy. Everything else about her frustrated him. He grumbled about her untidiness, extravagance, moodiness and the fact that her heavy periods and a recurrent labial abscess meant that she often wasn\u2019t available for sex. Most of all, he resented the way that she had taken to hiring plain maidservants in the hope that he would leave them alone (it didn\u2019t work). Inevitably he took out his frustrations with his fists: on 19 December 1664 he gave Elizabeth such a black eye that she was unable to go to church on Christmas Day for fear of what the neighbours would think.<\/p>\n
While Pepys\u2019s dark side has long been known, it is something else to be confronted with the evidence laid out quite so starkly. The man who emerges from De la B\u00e9doy\u00e8re\u2019s meticulous filleting is no Restoration roustabout but a chilling embodiment of male entitlement. This newly explicit view of Pepys does not negate the continuing value of his diary \u2013 which remains a magnificent historical resource \u2013 but from now on it will be impossible to go to it in a state of innocence, let alone denial.<\/p>\n
skip past newsletter promotion<\/a><\/p>\n Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you<\/p>\n Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy<\/a>. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy<\/a> and Terms of Service<\/a> apply.<\/p>\n after newsletter promotion<\/p>\n