{"id":454021,"date":"2026-03-02T19:10:11","date_gmt":"2026-03-02T19:10:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/454021\/"},"modified":"2026-03-02T19:10:11","modified_gmt":"2026-03-02T19:10:11","slug":"child-social-media-ban-among-new-uk-proposals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/454021\/","title":{"rendered":"Child social media ban among new UK proposals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#13;<\/p>\n<p>Australia\u00a0became the first country in the world to introduce a\u00a0ban on children under the age of 16 accessing social media platforms late last year.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pinsentmasons.com\/out-law\/news\/u16-social-media-ban-force-australia\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">That law<\/a>\u00a0imposes user age assurance\u00a0requirements\u00a0on\u00a0platforms. In January, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pinsentmasons.com\/out-law\/news\/uk-consult-social-media-ban-children\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the UK government promised to consult on its own ban<\/a>. It has now <a rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk\/media\/69a494a6286b6fdc85daeb1c\/growing_up_in_the_online_world-national-conversation.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">opened a consultation<\/a> (76-page \/ 830KB PDF) on the matter. It has asked stakeholders whether they would support a legal requirement for social media services to have a minimum age of access \u2013 and is seeking views on whether that measure should be applied to under-16s or for children aged younger.<\/p>\n<p>Alternative interventions are also under consideration, however. These include daily screen time limits for individual apps, restricting overnight access for individual apps, and imposing age-related restrictions \u2013 including on services that have personalised algorithms or on the use of certain features and functionalities, like those that allow children to make in-service purchases or which encourage them to use services for longer.<\/p>\n<p>Read more from Pinsent Masons on child online safety<\/p>\n<p>Through its consultation, which will close on\u00a026 May 2026, the government is also seeking views on whether the digital age of consent, under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), should be raised from the current 13 years. The digital age of consent is 14 in Italy and Spain, 15 in France, and 16 in Germany and Ireland.<\/p>\n<p>The government said it will act \u201cswiftly on the evidence gathered\u201d from the consultation. Its response is expected this summer.<\/p>\n<p>Lauro Fava of Pinsent Masons welcomed the fact that the government is considering various options and not just focusing on a ban.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA lot of charities are against a ban because they perceive it not to be in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pinsentmasons.com\/out-law\/guides\/the-un-principles-shaping-child-online-safety-regulation\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the best interests of children \u2013 a concept recognised in international law<\/a>,\u201d said Fava.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cArguably, proponents of a ban place an over-emphasis on rights to privacy and safety and overlook the many benefits of social media access for children \u2013 the ability to learn and be creative, among others \u2013 as well as the other relevant rights at play under international law, including children\u2019s rights to play and leisure time and to freedom of expression,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cImplementing a ban would come with problems \u2013 for example: how to effectively address the risk of circumvention; how to address risks associated with young people gaining overnight access to a digital environment that they have no prior experience of; and how to ensure vulnerable children can get access to support services,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMore targeted interventions on specific features and functionalities of social media platforms, such as infinite scrolling, autoplay, and personalised algorithms, would be a more proportionate response and build on existing obligations platforms face under UK frameworks. Under the UK GDPR, for example, platforms have obligations in respect of privacy-by-design, fair processing and profiling, while risks associated with children spending long periods of time on social media are also something platforms might be expected to act on following their children\u2019s risk assessments under the Online Safety Act and to avoid detrimental uses of data flagged in the Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office\u2019s \u2018children\u2019s code\u2019,\u201d according to Fava.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMany platforms already see the direction of travel on the issue of \u2018stickiness\u2019 and, notwithstanding the lack of conclusive research around the impact on children\u2019s mental health, are already making it easier for children and parents to limit screentime. Platforms now have an opportunity to encourage the UK government to ensure that any further regulatory intervention is aligned with that already taken in the EU under the Digital Services Act, to enable consistency in what technical measures need to be deployed cross-border,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat is important is that children are given their place in feeding their thoughts in on any prospective ban or restrictions. While there may be some parents that would welcome a ban as a solution to the problem of keeping up with fast-moving changing technologies and practices, children will have their own ideas about what constitutes their \u2018best interests\u2019 in relation to balancing the benefits of having access to services with the acknowledgement of potential harms that can arise from that,\u201d Fava added.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"&#13; Australia\u00a0became the first country in the world to introduce a\u00a0ban on children under the age of 16&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":454022,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,57,58,50,56,54,55],"class_list":{"0":"post-454021","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-united-kingdom","8":"tag-gb","9":"tag-great-britain","10":"tag-greatbritain","11":"tag-news","12":"tag-uk","13":"tag-united-kingdom","14":"tag-unitedkingdom"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454021","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=454021"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454021\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/454022"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=454021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=454021"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=454021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}