{"id":457098,"date":"2026-03-04T13:17:09","date_gmt":"2026-03-04T13:17:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/457098\/"},"modified":"2026-03-04T13:17:09","modified_gmt":"2026-03-04T13:17:09","slug":"ir35-united-kingdom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/457098\/","title":{"rendered":"IR35 &#8211; &#8211; United Kingdom"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The introduction of IR35 for the private sector took effect from&#13;<br \/>\nApril 2021 and represented the biggest change to employment tax for&#13;<br \/>\ndecades.<\/p>\n<p>Before then, businesses in the private sector were able to&#13;<br \/>\nengage contractors using personal services companies (or other&#13;<br \/>\nintermediaries) without having to give too much thought to the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor&#8217;s employment status for tax purposes. This changed&#13;<br \/>\nfor &#8220;medium and large&#8221;-sized private-sector businesses in&#13;<br \/>\nApril 2021 when the responsibility for determining a&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor&#8217;s status and, if appropriate, operating PAYE and&#13;<br \/>\nNational Insurance contributions (&#8220;NICs&#8221;) switched from&#13;<br \/>\nthe personal services company to the end-user business.<\/p>\n<p>Inside<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nWhich end users does this affect?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nWhich contractors does this affect?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nHow to carry out the status determination&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nThe dispute resolution process&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nConsequences if the status assessment is incorrect&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nProcesses and documentation&#13;<\/p>\n<p>What is IR35?<\/p>\n<p>IR35 is a tax anti-avoidance rule designed to combat&#13;<br \/>\n&#8220;disguised employment&#8221; in situations where an individual&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor is providing their personal services (i.e., their&#13;<br \/>\nlabour) to an end-user via their own intermediary, such as a&#13;<br \/>\npersonal services company or partnership (referred to collectively&#13;<br \/>\nas &#8220;PSC&#8221; in this Inbrief).<\/p>\n<p>IR35 applies when the contractor would be an employee (or&#13;<br \/>\nofficeholder) for tax purposes if they were hired directly by the&#13;<br \/>\nend-user. If IR35 applies, PAYE and NICs must be operated in&#13;<br \/>\nrespect of the fees paid to the PSC.<\/p>\n<p>Since April 2021, for large and medium-sized private-sector&#13;<br \/>\nbusinesses, responsibility for assessing whether IR35 applies has&#13;<br \/>\nbeen with the end-user. If the end-user determines that IR35&#13;<br \/>\napplies, the responsibility for operating PAYE and NICs will move&#13;<br \/>\nfrom the PSC to the &#8220;fee payer&#8221; \u2013 that is,&#13;<br \/>\ngenerally, the entity which contracts directly with and pays the&#13;<br \/>\nPSC.<\/p>\n<p>Overview of the process<\/p>\n<p>The end-user is required to assess whether the contractor is&#13;<br \/>\nemployed or self-employed for tax purposes. It must take reasonable&#13;<br \/>\ncare in making that assessment and confirm its assessment together&#13;<br \/>\nwith reasons in a Status Determination Statement&#13;<br \/>\n(&#8220;SDS&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>The end-user must provide the SDS to the next party in the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractual chain before making the first payment. This is next&#13;<br \/>\nparty will be the contractor themselves, unless there is another&#13;<br \/>\nparty in the chain such as an agency. If there is an agency in the&#13;<br \/>\nchain (see below), the SDS must be provided to the agency, who must&#13;<br \/>\nthen pass the SDS down the chain in turn. In practice, contractors&#13;<br \/>\naccepting a new assignment are likely to want to know in advance&#13;<br \/>\nwhether they will be assessed as within the scope of IR35.<\/p>\n<p>The end-user is required to have a dispute resolution procedure&#13;<br \/>\nto enable the contractor to challenge the assessment. In practice,&#13;<br \/>\na contractor is unlikely to challenge an SDS which assesses them as&#13;<br \/>\nfalling outside the scope of IR35. HMRC may review the assessment,&#13;<br \/>\nhowever, so it is important that the SDS sets out in sufficient&#13;<br \/>\ndetail the basis on which the decision is made, showing that&#13;<br \/>\nreasonable care has been taken.<\/p>\n<p>If the assessment concludes that the contractor is out of scope&#13;<br \/>\nof IR35, the PSC can continue to be paid gross. If, however, the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor is assessed as within IR35, the fee payer (which is the&#13;<br \/>\nlast party in the contractual chain before the PSC) is responsible&#13;<br \/>\nfor operating PAYE and deducting employee NICs on the fees it pays&#13;<br \/>\nto the PSC (excluding VAT). The fee payer must also pay employer&#13;<br \/>\nNICs and, where applicable, the apprenticeship levy.<\/p>\n<p>If there is a UK agency in the chain<\/p>\n<p>If there is a UK agency in the chain which supplies the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor via a PSC, the agency is the &#8220;fee payer&#8221;&#13;<br \/>\nbecause it is the party that contracts with and pays the PSC. As&#13;<br \/>\nthe fee payer, the agency will have the obligation to operate&#13;<br \/>\nPAYE\/NICs and pay employer NICs and, where applicable, the&#13;<br \/>\napprenticeship levy.<\/p>\n<p>However, the end-user retains responsibility for issuing an SDS&#13;<br \/>\nand providing a dispute resolution procedure. It must provide the&#13;<br \/>\nSDS to the agency as well as the contractor and the agency must&#13;<br \/>\nalso be allowed to appeal against the assessment.<\/p>\n<p>The obligation to operate PAYE\/NICs remains with the end user if&#13;<br \/>\nit does not meet its responsibilities, e.g., if it fails to provide&#13;<br \/>\nan SDS before the first payment is made. In addition, HMRC has&#13;<br \/>\npower to transfer PAYE\/NICs liability from the agency to the&#13;<br \/>\nend-user if there is no realistic prospect of recovery from the&#13;<br \/>\nagency within a reasonable period. HMRC has confirmed in its&#13;<br \/>\nguidance that it will generally not exercise this power if the&#13;<br \/>\nfailure to account for the PAYE\/\/NICs is due to a genuine&#13;<br \/>\ncommercial business failure.<\/p>\n<p>There are more complex rules for offshore agencies. If in doubt,&#13;<br \/>\nplease contact us for advice.<\/p>\n<p>What is the wider impact of IR35?<\/p>\n<p>IR35 is a tax rule. Crucially, it does not change the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor&#8217;s status for employment law purposes.<\/p>\n<p>It is still legitimate for contractors to use PSCs &#8211; it is not&#13;<br \/>\ntax evasion to do so. End-users and fee payers should bear in mind&#13;<br \/>\ntheir obligation under the Criminal Finances Act 2017 to have&#13;<br \/>\nreasonable procedures in place to prevent tax evasion and the&#13;<br \/>\nfacilitation of tax evasion by their employees and contractors&#13;<br \/>\nwhile performing services for or on behalf of the end-user. If in&#13;<br \/>\ndoubt, please contact us for advice.<\/p>\n<p>Which end users are affected?<\/p>\n<p>Subject to anti-avoidance provisions, &#8220;small&#8221;&#13;<br \/>\nprivate-sector end-users are exempt from the new rules and are not&#13;<br \/>\nrequired to determine whether IR35 applies. Instead, the old rules&#13;<br \/>\ncontinue to apply &#8211; the contractor\/PSC remains responsible for&#13;<br \/>\ndetermining whether IR35 applies and the fee payer can still pay&#13;<br \/>\nthe PSC gross.<\/p>\n<p>A corporate end-user which is not part of a group will be&#13;<br \/>\ntreated as &#8220;small&#8221; in its first financial year and will&#13;<br \/>\nremain small until it ceases to be so. Small companies will become&#13;<br \/>\nmedium or large if they meet at least two of the following&#13;<br \/>\nconditions for two consecutive financial years:<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nannual turnover of more than \u00a310.2 million&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nbalance sheet total of more than \u00a35.1 million&#13;<\/p>\n<p>If two of these conditions are satisfied, the company must apply&#13;<br \/>\nthe IR35 rules from the start of the tax year following the&#13;<br \/>\naccounting filing date for the second financial year.<\/p>\n<p>These thresholds increase from April 2026, with the annual&#13;<br \/>\nturnover limit increasing to \u00a315 million, and the balance&#13;<br \/>\nsheet total limit increasing to \u00a37.5 million, though it is&#13;<br \/>\nworth nothing that because of the two year &#8220;look back&#8221;&#13;<br \/>\nperiod, these new thresholds will not have practical application&#13;<br \/>\nuntil April 2027 at the earliest.<br \/>&#13;<br \/>\nWhere the small company is part of a larger group of companies, the&#13;<br \/>\ngroup turnover and revenue will need to be considered &#8211; please&#13;<br \/>\ncontact us for advice.<\/p>\n<p>Where the small company is part of a larger group of companies,&#13;<br \/>\nthe group turnover and revenue will need to be considered &#8211; please&#13;<br \/>\ncontact us for advice.<\/p>\n<p>Non-corporate end-users will be treated as &#8220;small&#8221; for&#13;<br \/>\na tax year if their annual turnover in the financial year ending at&#13;<br \/>\nleast nine months before the start of the relevant tax year was not&#13;<br \/>\nmore than \u00a310.2 million.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, IR35 does not apply to end-users who are based&#13;<br \/>\nwholly overseas. In this situation, the PSC will still be paid&#13;<br \/>\ngross and it will be for the contractor\/PSC to determine whether&#13;<br \/>\nIR35 applies and, if so, to operate PAYE\/NICs. An end user is based&#13;<br \/>\nwholly overseas if immediately prior to the start of the relevant&#13;<br \/>\ntax year it was not resident in the UK and did not have a permanent&#13;<br \/>\nestablishment in the UK.<\/p>\n<p>Which contractors are affected?<\/p>\n<p>IR35 affects individual contractors using a PSC to provide their&#13;<br \/>\nlabour. Contractors will not be affected by IR35 if they supply&#13;<br \/>\ntheir labour directly to the end-user without using a PSC (e.g., as&#13;<br \/>\na sole trader, though in such cases end-users are generally&#13;<br \/>\nrequired to make employment status assessments under general&#13;<br \/>\nprinciples).<\/p>\n<p>Contractors who are not tax resident in the UK and who are&#13;<br \/>\nsupplying their services exclusively outside the UK are unaffected.&#13;<br \/>\nIf they supply some services within the UK, the rules are more&#13;<br \/>\ncomplex and you should contact us for advice.<\/p>\n<p>IR35 is focused on the provision of labour rather than services.&#13;<br \/>\nFully outsourced services are therefore out of scope. For example,&#13;<br \/>\nif a company fully outsources its IT helpdesk or catering services&#13;<br \/>\nto a third party, it does not need to determine whether IR35&#13;<br \/>\napplies to any contractors working for that third-party service&#13;<br \/>\nprovider. Businesses who provide managed services rather than staff&#13;<br \/>\nshould be seeking to educate their customers about the fact that&#13;<br \/>\nIR35 does not apply to them at all.<\/p>\n<p>How to carry out the status determination<\/p>\n<p>The law requires end-users to exercise &#8220;reasonable&#13;<br \/>\ncare&#8221; in making the status determination. The obligation is to&#13;<br \/>\nassess what the contractor&#8217;s status for tax purposes would have&#13;<br \/>\nbeen if they had been engaged directly by the end-user without a&#13;<br \/>\nPSC.<\/p>\n<p>This involves taking account of several factors, including:<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nControl and working arrangements \u2013 how much control does&#13;<br \/>\nthe end-user have over the contractor&#8217;s hours and place of&#13;<br \/>\nwork? Can the end-user direct how the work is done or is it highly&#13;<br \/>\nskilled\/specialised? Can the end-user move the contractor to&#13;<br \/>\ndifferent projects?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nSubstitution \u2013 can the contractor send a substitute? Have&#13;<br \/>\nthey ever done this? Can the end-user reject the substitute?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nMutuality of obligation \u2013 is there a binding commitment&#13;<br \/>\non the contractor or end-user to provide\/offer work?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nIntegration into the business \u2013 how involved is the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor in the business and its management? How would they&#13;<br \/>\nintroduce themselves to customers \u2013 as working for the&#13;<br \/>\nend-user or for themselves?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nCarrying on business on their own account \u2013 does the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor take any significant financial risk? Do they need to&#13;<br \/>\nmake significant investments in equipment or tools?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nOther factors \u2013 for example, does the end-user impose&#13;<br \/>\nrestrictions on what other work the contractor can do? Does the&#13;<br \/>\ncontract take up the majority of the contractor&#8217;s time? Have&#13;<br \/>\nthey previously worked for the company? What is the intention of&#13;<br \/>\nthe parties?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>The SDS will only be valid if it includes the reasons for the&#13;<br \/>\ndetermination.<\/p>\n<p>The status determination assessment needs to be repeated if the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor&#8217;s assignment continues for any significant period of&#13;<br \/>\ntime (we think at least every 12 months, although there is no&#13;<br \/>\nguidance on this) or if the circumstances change.<\/p>\n<p>HMRC&#8217;s CEST tool<\/p>\n<p>HMRC&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/guidance\/check-employment-status-for-tax\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Check Employment Status for Tax<\/a>&#13;<br \/>\n(&#8220;CEST&#8221;) tool is designed to assess whether a contractor&#13;<br \/>\nwould be an employee for tax purposes if they were hired&#13;<br \/>\ndirectly.<\/p>\n<p>The CEST tool has been revised a number of times but it still&#13;<br \/>\nhas flaws. Specifically, it still fails to test whether there is&#13;<br \/>\nsufficient &#8220;mutuality of obligation&#8221; in the relationship&#13;<br \/>\nbetween the end-user and contractor &#8211; one of the necessary&#13;<br \/>\nconditions of employment (HMRC&#8217;s view is that it is invariably&#13;<br \/>\npresent). The CEST tool also fails to produce any result in a&#13;<br \/>\nsignificant number of cases.<\/p>\n<p>The end-user is not obliged to use the CEST tool, but it&#13;<br \/>\nhighlights the main issues that HMRC are concerned about when&#13;<br \/>\nconsidering status for tax purposes. It also has the advantage&#13;<br \/>\nthat, so long as the end-user enters the information correctly and&#13;<br \/>\nkeeps it up to date, HMRC is bound by the result. Note, however,&#13;<br \/>\nthat the end-user must take responsibility for using the tool. A&#13;<br \/>\nCEST assessment that is carried out by the contractor personally is&#13;<br \/>\nnot binding on HMRC.<\/p>\n<p>Given this, we consider that it is sensible to make the CEST&#13;<br \/>\ntool the starting point in most cases. However, end-users still&#13;<br \/>\nbear responsibility for making a status determination, even when&#13;<br \/>\nthe CEST tool produces no answer. Businesses therefore need an&#13;<br \/>\nadditional way to make such determinations in at least some&#13;<br \/>\ncases.<\/p>\n<p>Large businesses which are subject to the Uncertain Tax&#13;<br \/>\nTreatments (&#8220;UTT&#8221;) rules may also need to think carefully&#13;<br \/>\nbefore using CEST, particularly if the CEST tool is being used to&#13;<br \/>\ndetermine the status of a number of contractors operating under the&#13;<br \/>\nsame terms and in broadly the same manner. The UTT rules require&#13;<br \/>\nsuch business to notify HMRC if: (i) the business has interpreted&#13;<br \/>\nthe law in a way which is different from HMRC&#8217;s &#8220;known&#13;<br \/>\nposition&#8221;; and (ii) the tax\/NICs advantage as a result of the&#13;<br \/>\nbusinesses interpretation is expected to be more than \u00a35m in&#13;<br \/>\na 12 month period. HMRC has made it clear in UTT guidance that CEST&#13;<br \/>\ntool outputs indicating that a contractor is within or outside IR35&#13;<br \/>\nconstitute HMRC&#8217;s &#8220;known position&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The dispute resolution process<\/p>\n<p>When the IR35 changes were first discussed, there were calls for&#13;<br \/>\nHMRC to provide a procedure for verifying decisions. Instead,&#13;<br \/>\nhowever, it is the end-user&#8217;s responsibility to provide a&#13;<br \/>\nprocess for resolving disputes.<\/p>\n<p>If a contractor or the fee payer considers that the&#13;<br \/>\nend-user&#8217;s IR35 decision is incorrect, they may make&#13;<br \/>\nrepresentations before the final payment under the arrangement is&#13;<br \/>\nmade. The end-user then has 45 days to review the representations&#13;<br \/>\nand either:<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\ninform the contractor (and any agency with which the end-user&#13;<br \/>\ncontracts) that their initial SDS was correct; or&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nissue a new SDS, withdrawing the previous one.&#13;<\/p>\n<p>The end-user must provide reasons for its decision but cannot be&#13;<br \/>\ncompelled by a contractor or agency to change it.<\/p>\n<p>Consequences if the status assessment is incorrect<\/p>\n<p>If HMRC disagree with an end user&#8217;s determination that a&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor falls outside IR35, HMRC will seek arrears of PAYE,&#13;<br \/>\nemployee and employer NICs and apprenticeship levy (if applicable)&#13;<br \/>\ntogether with interest and potentially penalties from the deemed&#13;<br \/>\nemployer The deemed employer is generally the fee payer unless the&#13;<br \/>\nend user has failed in any of its IR35 obligations, in which case&#13;<br \/>\nthe end user will be the deemed employer even if there is a UK&#13;<br \/>\nagency in the chain.<\/p>\n<p>In calculating the deemed employer&#8217;s liability for PAYE\/NICs&#13;<br \/>\narrears, if certain conditions are satisfied, HMRC will offset: (i)&#13;<br \/>\nany corporation tax paid by the PSC on its fees from the relevant&#13;<br \/>\nengagement; (ii) any income tax paid by the contractor on their&#13;<br \/>\nemployment earnings or dividend income from the PSC in relation to&#13;<br \/>\nthe relevant engagement; and (iii) any employee NICs paid by the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor on their employment earnings from the PSC in relation to&#13;<br \/>\nthe relevant engagement. Under the offset mechanism, there is no&#13;<br \/>\noffset of employer NICs (or apprenticeship levy if any) paid by the&#13;<br \/>\nPSC, so the PSC should continue to apply for a refund of these&#13;<br \/>\namounts.<\/p>\n<p>Cost impact of IR35<\/p>\n<p>If IR35 applies, the fee payer needs to deduct PAYE and employee&#13;<br \/>\nNICs from the fees paid to the PSC (excluding VAT). Although the&#13;<br \/>\ncontractor would have needed to pay tax at some point, IR35 means&#13;<br \/>\nthat they lose the cash-flow advantage associated with using a PSC.&#13;<br \/>\nIn addition, the contractor is likely to be worse off in real terms&#13;<br \/>\ngiven the marginal employment tax rates as compared with&#13;<br \/>\nalternative arrangements under the PSC (e.g., extracting profits as&#13;<br \/>\ndividends).<\/p>\n<p>On top of this, if IR35 applies, the fee payer needs to pay&#13;<br \/>\nemployer NICs and apprenticeship levy costs on the fees paid to the&#13;<br \/>\nPSC. This means an additional cost of as much as 15.54%, which&#13;<br \/>\ncannot be passed on to the PSC. It may be possible, however -&#13;<br \/>\ndepending on the contractual terms &#8211; to enter into in a new&#13;<br \/>\ncontract with the PSC under which the fees are renegotiated to&#13;<br \/>\nensure the net costs do not increase.<\/p>\n<p>If the end-user uses an agency to engage the contractor, the&#13;<br \/>\nagency will be responsible for operating PAYE\/NICS and the&#13;<br \/>\napprenticeship levy, although it is likely to seek to negotiate&#13;<br \/>\nreimbursement from the end-user.<\/p>\n<p>Processes and documentation<\/p>\n<p>The end-user needs to have robust processes and controls for&#13;<br \/>\nidentifying and recording the use of contractors, including those&#13;<br \/>\nsupplied via an agency. It will also need clear and&#13;<br \/>\nwell-communicated policies for hiring contractors which ensure that&#13;<br \/>\nappropriate authority is given before they are appointed. In&#13;<br \/>\naddition, the end-user should have a clear and consistent&#13;<br \/>\nmethodology for making status determinations, especially in&#13;<br \/>\nsituations where the CEST tool does not produce a result. The end&#13;<br \/>\nuser will need to ensure that its SDS sets out the reasons for the&#13;<br \/>\ndetermination. Where the CEST tool has provided a result, attaching&#13;<br \/>\nthe output to the SDS will be sufficient to provide the required&#13;<br \/>\nreasons.<\/p>\n<p>Contracts with PSCs should reflect the IR35 reforms. For&#13;<br \/>\nexample:<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nThe terms of the contract with the PSC should not contradict&#13;<br \/>\nthe basis of the status assessment made by the end-user (e.g., in&#13;<br \/>\nrelation to whether the contractor must do the work personally or&#13;<br \/>\ncan send a substitute).&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nThe end-user should reserve the right to deduct PAYE and NICs -&#13;<br \/>\nimmediately (if IR35 applies), in future (in case the position&#13;<br \/>\nchanges), and pending any challenge to the status assessment.&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nThe contract should include clear tax warranties and&#13;<br \/>\nindemnities.&#13;<\/p>\n<p>If the end-user is also the &#8220;fee payer&#8221; (i.e., there&#13;<br \/>\nis no UK agency or other relevant intermediary in the contractual&#13;<br \/>\nclaim), it will also need to adapt its payroll and accounts payable&#13;<br \/>\nsystems for IR35 compliance. For contractors in scope of IR35, the&#13;<br \/>\npayroll system will need to add the contractor to the system and&#13;<br \/>\noperate PAYE\/NICs on the fees excluding VAT, while the accounts&#13;<br \/>\npayable system will need to pay the PSC the fees net of income tax&#13;<br \/>\nand employee NICs plus VAT on the gross fees. The system also needs&#13;<br \/>\nto align with the terms agreed with the PSC in relation to when&#13;<br \/>\ninvoices will be paid.<\/p>\n<p>Contracts and working arrangements with agencies or other&#13;<br \/>\nintermediaries should also reflect the IR35 position:<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nWill the agency be precluded from supplying individuals via&#13;<br \/>\nPSCs, or will they just have to notify the end-user in advance if&#13;<br \/>\nthey do so?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nCan the agency pass the full cost of operating PAYE\/NICs and&#13;<br \/>\nthe apprenticeship levy back to the end-user?&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nAgencies will need to supply information to help the end-user&#13;<br \/>\nwith the SDS.&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nThe end-user will need to communicate the outcome of the status&#13;<br \/>\nassessment to the agency and should always make sure they do so in&#13;<br \/>\nwriting.&#13;<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\nAgencies will need to pass the statement to the entity with&#13;<br \/>\nwhich they are contracting.&#13;<\/p>\n<p>The terms and conditions of any businesses supplying staff or&#13;<br \/>\nmanaged services should contain IR35 compliant terms. Different&#13;<br \/>\nwording will be needed depending on whether the business is&#13;<br \/>\nsupplying staff or managed services. Some firms run various&#13;<br \/>\nbusiness models including secondment of staff, supply of staff to&#13;<br \/>\nclients and\/or managed services while using very similar or even&#13;<br \/>\nidentical terms and conditions. It is advisable for such businesses&#13;<br \/>\nto delineate their business models, create separate terms for each&#13;<br \/>\nmodel and train those who use them on when to use which terms.<\/p>\n<p>The content of this article is intended to provide a general&#13;<br \/>\nguide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought&#13;<br \/>\nabout your specific circumstances.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The introduction of IR35 for the private sector took effect from&#13; April 2021 and represented the biggest change&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":15222,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,57,58,50,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-457098","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-united-kingdom","tag-gb","tag-great-britain","tag-greatbritain","tag-news","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/457098","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=457098"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/457098\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15222"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=457098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=457098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=457098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}