{"id":476862,"date":"2026-03-15T11:43:26","date_gmt":"2026-03-15T11:43:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/476862\/"},"modified":"2026-03-15T11:43:26","modified_gmt":"2026-03-15T11:43:26","slug":"artists-agonise-over-when-a-work-is-finished-but-should-we-viewers-care-the-art-newspaper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/476862\/","title":{"rendered":"Artists agonise over when a work is finished\u2014but should we viewers care? &#8211; The Art Newspaper"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"pt-dp-p font-text-light font-light text-lg leading-normal tracking-wide mb-base last:mb-0\" itemprop=\"text\">Of all artists\u2019 dilemmas, among the toughest is deciding when a work is finished. A piece that might appear fresh and immediate runs the risk of being undercooked. And as the critic David Sylvester once remarked: \u201cGoing on for a long time is\u2026 a necessary gamble. Even with great artists, it often wrecks pictures, irredeemably.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"pt-dp-p font-text-light font-light text-lg leading-normal tracking-wide mb-base last:mb-0\" itemprop=\"text\">Sylvester said this in a 1982 interview with Howard Hodgkin, whose <a class=\"transition-colors duration-default shadow-externalLink hover:text-red-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pitzhanger.org.uk\/whatson\/howard-hodgkin\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">exhibition<\/a> at Pitzhanger Manor and Gallery in London continues until 8 March. Sylvester asked the British painter how he knew a picture was complete. For Hodgkin, the process of reaching his conclusion was often anxious and lengthy\u2014Snapshot, one of his biggest paintings, has the dates 1984-93. Yet he found it easier to know when he was finally done. \u201cMy pictures are finished when the subject comes back,\u201d he told Sylvester. That is, once he had combined the visual memory of an event\u2014meeting a person, an experience in a city or landscape\u2014together with his emotions and \u201csomehow transmuted, transformed or made [it] into a physical object\u201d. Then, he said, \u201cthe picture\u2019s finished and there is no question of doing anything more to it\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"pt-dp-p font-text-light font-light text-lg leading-normal tracking-wide mb-base last:mb-0\" itemprop=\"text\">Hodgkin and Sylvester then discussed Edgar Degas\u2019s marvellous H\u00e9l\u00e8ne Rouart in her Father\u2019s Study (around 1886) in London\u2019s National Gallery. Here, Rouart stands behind her father\u2019s empty chair, surrounded by his things: papers on his desk, Egyptian figures in a vitrine, an antique carpet on the wall, a <a class=\"transition-all duration-default shadow-internalLink hover:text-red-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theartnewspaper.com\/keywords\/jean-baptiste-camille-corot\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot<\/a> painting behind her. Sylvester observed that \u201cto conventional art-historical wisdom, the painting is not quite finished\u201d, to which Hodgkin replied: \u201cI think the whole picture is deliberately made to look like an un\ufb01nished painting.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"pt-dp-p font-text-light font-light text-lg leading-normal tracking-wide mb-base last:mb-0\" itemprop=\"text\">He pointed to the element I (and I know many painters) most love about Degas\u2019s painting: \u201cthose curious red and blue pastel lines round the arm, along the edge of the body\u201d. Hodgkin suggested that Degas drew back into the painting because \u201cit had got a bit tight in places\u2026 and clearly Degas was trying to soften it again\u201d. In other words, he worked more on it in order to avoid the wrecking-through-overworking that Sylvester warned against. Such is the tightrope artists walk.<\/p>\n<p>Matisse and Cezanne<\/p>\n<p class=\"pt-dp-p font-text-light font-light text-lg leading-normal tracking-wide mb-base last:mb-0\" itemprop=\"text\">Notions of finish and unfinish abound in several current exhibitions. The <a class=\"transition-colors duration-default shadow-externalLink hover:text-red-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.grandpalais.fr\/en\/program\/matisse\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Matisse exhibition opening at the Grand Palais<\/a> in Paris on 24 March focuses on his later period, when at times Matisse seemed as concerned with process than arriving at a conclusion. He wrote to his son, the art dealer Pierre Matisse, in 1935: \u201cI wish material circumstances,\u201d meaning exhibitions and sales, \u201cwould allow me to leave [paintings] more or less in progress.\u201d Matisse showed photographs of earlier states alongside some of his pictures, and some of his final cut-outs were only fixed with glue posthumously, after originally having been pinned, tumbling across his walls in Nice.<\/p>\n<p class=\"pt-dp-p font-text-light font-light text-lg leading-normal tracking-wide mb-base last:mb-0\" itemprop=\"text\">Meanwhile, the <a class=\"transition-colors duration-default shadow-externalLink hover:text-red-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.fondationbeyeler.ch\/en\/exhibitions\/cezanne\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Cezanne exhibition at the Fondation Beyeler<\/a> in Basel (until 25 May) addresses the openness of the French master\u2019s technique\u2014the arrangement of taches or coloured marks that, together with areas of bare canvas, add up to what Cezanne termed the r\u00e9alisation of his paintings. As the catalogue for the show confirms, when we look at his work 120 years after his death, we are encountering pictures Cezanne deemed complete alongside those that were unfinished, abandoned and even, as Gottfried Boehm puts it, \u201cfragmentarily complete\u201d\u2014like <a class=\"transition-colors duration-default shadow-externalLink hover:text-red-1\" href=\"https:\/\/collection.kunsthaus.ch\/en\/collection\/item\/18\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Montagne Sainte-Victoire vue des Lauves<\/a> (1902-06), from the Kunsthaus Z\u00fcrich. The poet Rainer Maria Rilke observed that we best understand Cezanne\u2019s working process by looking at \u201can unfinished picture\u201d, something borne out in the scores of artists, from Matisse onwards, who have gained so much for their own work through observing these open painted structures.<\/p>\n<p>Deciding when a work is finished might provoke much gnashing of teeth in the studio<\/p>\n<p class=\"pt-dp-p font-text-light font-light text-lg leading-normal tracking-wide mb-base last:mb-0\" itemprop=\"text\">Finally, Turner and Constable: Rivals and Originals at Tate Britain (until 12 April) reflects how the modern reception of an artist\u2019s work flies in the face of what they themselves would have countenanced. As the curator, Amy Concannon, spells out, it was displays of the two artists\u2019 \u201cunfinished, preparatory work, of the kind neither would have shown in public\u201d that saw them hailed as proto-Modernists and abstractionists. Turner was presented at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York in 1966 because, as Monroe Wheeler, then the museum\u2019s director of exhibitions, said, \u201cwe know a modern painter when we see one\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"pt-dp-p font-text-light font-light text-lg leading-normal tracking-wide mb-base last:mb-0\" itemprop=\"text\">So deciding when a work is finished might provoke much gnashing of teeth in the studio. But posterity, frankly, won\u2019t give a damn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Of all artists\u2019 dilemmas, among the toughest is deciding when a work is finished. A piece that might&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":476863,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[26421,26420,6225,6485,6486,1120,96,12787,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-476862","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-arts-and-design","tag-art-critic","tag-artists","tag-arts","tag-arts-and-design","tag-artsanddesign","tag-design","tag-entertainment","tag-painting","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476862","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=476862"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476862\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/476863"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=476862"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=476862"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=476862"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}