{"id":487519,"date":"2026-03-21T11:19:16","date_gmt":"2026-03-21T11:19:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/487519\/"},"modified":"2026-03-21T11:19:16","modified_gmt":"2026-03-21T11:19:16","slug":"starship-may-act-as-nasas-lunar-taxi-after-artemis-v-the-register","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/487519\/","title":{"rendered":"Starship may act as NASA&#8217;s lunar taxi after Artemis V \u2022 The Register"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>NASA is reportedly considering using SpaceX&#8217;s Starship to transport the Orion capsule to the Moon, with some sources calling it a done deal.<\/p>\n<p>First <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2026-03-19\/nasa-plans-bigger-spacex-moon-mission-role-in-blow-to-boeing\">reported by Bloomberg<\/a>, the plan would see Orion launch to Low Earth Orbit aboard the Space Launch System (SLS), rendezvous with Starship, and have SpaceX&#8217;s vehicle carry the crew the rest of the way to the Moon &#8211; beginning after Artemis V.<\/p>\n<p>The SLS has long been central to NASA&#8217;s Artemis architecture, yet its future has grown increasingly uncertain. A budget proposal from the current administration suggested cancelling it after Artemis III, before that was walked back. Then new NASA administrator Jared Isaacman &#8211; a former SpaceX customer &#8211; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theregister.com\/2026\/03\/02\/nasa_artemis_reshuffle\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">reshuffled the schedule again<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Artemis III is now a 2027 Low Earth Orbit mission to test lunar landing technology (analogous to Apollo 9&#8217;s dry run with the Lunar Module), with an actual landing pushed to Artemis IV in 2028 and Artemis V potentially following the same year.<\/p>\n<p>The report demonstrates the fluid state of the Artemis program as managers work to develop solutions that align with both the administrator&#8217;s vision and the budget within which NASA must operate. The SLS, while it has launched a successful uncrewed lunar mission, is delayed and over budget. Isaacman has stated a desire to increase the cadence of flights, and making the vehicle a ferry for jaunts to Low Earth Orbit would certainly simplify things.<\/p>\n<p>After that, Starship appears to be the preferred option for getting crews into lunar orbit.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal reflects the Artemis program&#8217;s increasingly fluid state as managers try to reconcile Isaacman&#8217;s vision with a constrained budget. The SLS has completed one successful uncrewed lunar mission, but it remains delayed and over budget. Using it purely as a ferry to Low Earth Orbit would reduce its role substantially, or it could be dropped altogether after Artemis V in favour of another human-rated vehicle. Blue Origin&#8217;s New Glenn, for example, is designed to carry humans and can lift up to 45 metric tons, enough for Orion and its European Service Module.<\/p>\n<p>Either path would be a blow for Boeing, prime contractor on the SLS core stage.<\/p>\n<p>Orion itself remains non-negotiable. Starship has no crew escape system and isn&#8217;t rated for re-entry at lunar return velocities, so the capsule is still needed regardless of what launches it.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s also the matter of Starship not yet having reached Earth orbit. The next test flight is scheduled for April; if it succeeds, 2026 could finally be the year the vehicle demonstrates orbital capacity, leaving two years to ready it for a lunar role by 2028.<\/p>\n<p>The Register asked NASA to comment on the plans.<\/p>\n<p>The logic of using Starship &#8211; which must fly a lunar mission regardless &#8211; to carry Orion along with it isn&#8217;t unreasonable. However the technical hurdles are real, congressional approval is far from guaranteed, and the SLS, irrespective of its faults, has actually flown.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever happens, this episode underscores one thing clearly: NASA&#8217;s path back to the Moon remains anything but settled. \u00ae<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"NASA is reportedly considering using SpaceX&#8217;s Starship to transport the Orion capsule to the Moon, with some sources&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":487520,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[90,416,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-487519","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-space","tag-science","tag-space","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487519","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=487519"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487519\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/487520"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=487519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=487519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=487519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}