{"id":516122,"date":"2026-04-06T16:33:08","date_gmt":"2026-04-06T16:33:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/516122\/"},"modified":"2026-04-06T16:33:08","modified_gmt":"2026-04-06T16:33:08","slug":"social-media-companies-fined-for-harming-user","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/516122\/","title":{"rendered":"Social Media Companies Fined for Harming User"},"content":{"rendered":"<p dir=\"ltr\">Meta and YouTube were just ordered to pay a woman a combined six million dollars for creating addictive products that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/03\/25\/technology\/social-media-trial-verdict.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">harmed her psychologically<\/a>. TikTok and Snapchat were also sued but settled out of court. <\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The 20-year-old woman joined YouTube at age 6 and Instagram at age 9. Over the course of her <a href=\"https:\/\/www.psychologytoday.com\/gb\/basics\/child-development\" title=\"Psychology Today looks at childhood\" class=\"basics-link\" hreflang=\"en\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">childhood<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.psychologytoday.com\/gb\/basics\/adolescence\" title=\"Psychology Today looks at adolescence\" class=\"basics-link\" hreflang=\"en\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">adolescence<\/a>, she explained that her experience on these platforms gave her body dysmorphia and thoughts of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.psychologytoday.com\/gb\/basics\/suicide\" title=\"Psychology Today looks at suicide\" class=\"basics-link\" hreflang=\"en\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">suicide<\/a>, and led her to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.psychologytoday.com\/gb\/basics\/self-harm\" title=\"Psychology Today looks at self-harm\" class=\"basics-link\" hreflang=\"en\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">self-harm<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The lawsuit accused Meta and YouTube of intentionally creating addictive platforms that enabled harm. Importantly, this circumvented Section 230, which protects <a href=\"https:\/\/www.psychologytoday.com\/gb\/basics\/social-media\" title=\"Psychology Today looks at social media\" class=\"basics-link\" hreflang=\"en\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">social media<\/a> companies from liability for content posted on their platforms. This strategy accused the platforms themselves of being harmful, not just what users uploaded or posted. <\/p>\n<p>Competing for Our Attention<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Meta and companies like it are engaged in what one design ethicist calls a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/CHRG-116shrg52609\/html\/CHRG-116shrg52609.htm\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\u201crace to the bottom of the brainstem.\u201d<\/a> That is, each social media company has to compete for our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.psychologytoday.com\/gb\/basics\/attention\" title=\"Psychology Today looks at attention\" class=\"basics-link\" hreflang=\"en\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">attention<\/a>. When one company designs a feature like infinite scrolling, all similar companies must either add it too or lose market share. That\u2019s why when TikTok became an overnight success, Instagram and Facebook added Reels, and YouTube added YouTube Shorts. Short-form videos are powerful ways to keep our attention. If they hadn\u2019t added them, they would have lost users and ad revenue. <\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Facebook used to simply host everything your friends had posted in reverse-chronological order. This was great for users, but bad for Facebook\u2019s bottom line. Most people would open Facebook, read the most recent posts, and then leave the platform. Instagram functioned the same way. The trouble for the platforms was that people were leaving satisfied. The longer you stay on their platforms, the more money they make. So they hired user experience researchers to explore what ways they can maximize your attention. <\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Since this early version of Facebook, they\u2019ve randomized the order of posts, added suggested content, added short-form videos, added infinite scroll, and collected all the data they can. They\u2019re noting whether you scroll past or linger on every post on your feed, compiling everything you\u2019ve ever \u201cliked\u201d or commented on, comparing it with everyone you talk to to guess what content is most likely to<a href=\"https:\/\/about.fb.com\/news\/2021\/01\/how-does-news-feed-predict-what-you-want-to-see\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> keep you engaged<\/a>, and pushing notifications whenever anyone posts anything in a group you follow. They\u2019re even tracking what websites you visit <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/kateoflahertyuk\/2021\/05\/08\/all-the-ways-facebook-tracks-you-and-how-to-stop-it\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">when you\u2019re not using Facebook<\/a>. They don\u2019t care whether you actually enjoyed the content, just that it kept you engaged long enough to keep you on the platform for a few more precious seconds. <\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Platforms like Meta and YouTube claim that they are not trying to make their products \u201caddictive.\u201d I believe them, but this is only a semantic difference. I don\u2019t think they want to be \u201caddictive,\u201d but they do need to keep you on their platform as long as possible to stay competitive. A product that uses psychological tricks to be hard to stop using and keep you coming back is not meaningfully different from something addictive. <\/p>\n<p>Failing to Implement Safety Features<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The lawsuit also accuses companies like Meta of removing or failing to implement safety features in order to not lose users. For example, their \u201cgrowth team\u201d looked into making teen accounts private by default\u2014preventing strangers from talking to children under 17. When they found that they would lose teen users by doing so, they decided to continue <a href=\"https:\/\/time.com\/7336204\/meta-lawsuit-files-child-safety\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">allowing adults to talk to minors<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Meta says that they have since created a number of safety features in their Teen Accounts program, but most of the promised features either were <a href=\"https:\/\/fairplayforkids.org\/pf\/teenaccountsbrokenpromises\/#1758733910604-b0737c6c-5280\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">never implemented or do not work as advertised<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">I hope this pushes social media companies to remove features like infinite scroll, algorithmic recommendations, and other habit-forming features, but I do not think that this will solve the problem long term. It will be a setback, but it will not stop them from searching for even more engaging features to implement. As I mentioned above, the line between \u201cengaging\u201d and \u201caddictive\u201d is very blurry. <\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The only solution I can see is to create a dedicated, safe social media space for minors. No randomized post order. No infinite scrolling. Hidden like counts. No tracking user data. No suggested accounts. No ability to communicate with strangers. A robust, effective system to report other users. However, I remain pessimistic that any tech company big enough to create it can be trusted, so we also need legislation requiring social media companies to protect their users from anticipated harm. <\/p>\n<p>Social Media Essential Reads<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Andrew is the author of <a href=\"https:\/\/bookshop.org\/p\/books\/parenting-a-gamer-help-your-child-build-healthy-habits-make-positive-choices-and-find-balance-in-virtual-worlds-andrew-fishman\/97b491d5902f6e9d?ean=9780897334617&amp;next=t&amp;\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Parenting a Gamer: Help Your Child Build Healthy Habits, Make Positive Choices, and Find Balance in Virtual Worlds<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Meta and YouTube were just ordered to pay a woman a combined six million dollars for creating addictive&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":516123,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,57,58,50,56,54,55],"class_list":{"0":"post-516122","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-united-kingdom","8":"tag-gb","9":"tag-great-britain","10":"tag-greatbritain","11":"tag-news","12":"tag-uk","13":"tag-united-kingdom","14":"tag-unitedkingdom"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/516122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=516122"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/516122\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/516123"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=516122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=516122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=516122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}