{"id":517171,"date":"2026-04-07T06:49:07","date_gmt":"2026-04-07T06:49:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/517171\/"},"modified":"2026-04-07T06:49:07","modified_gmt":"2026-04-07T06:49:07","slug":"its-heartbreaking-resident-doctors-in-england-face-halt-on-new-training-posts-doctors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/517171\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018It\u2019s heartbreaking\u2019: resident doctors in England face halt on new training posts | Doctors"},"content":{"rendered":"

After almost two years on the NHS frontline as a resident doctor, Heather Gunn says she is bracing herself for unemployment. Like many of her colleagues, she was desperate to secure one of the up to 4,500 additional training posts the government agreed to introduce in England<\/a> over three years to help doctors progress into more specialised fields.<\/p>\n

The posts were promised in negotiations between the doctors\u2019 union, the British Medical Association (BMA), and the government in a long-running dispute over resident doctors\u2019 pay and job security.<\/p>\n

Last week, with disagreements on pay still unresolved, the first 1,000 of these posts were withdrawn. Talks between the parties had broken down again and the union had refused to call off its 15th strike since 2023, which is scheduled to begin on Tuesday morning and last six days. The health secretary, Wes Streeting, told the BMA in a letter shared on his social media that it would not be \u201coperationally or financially possible\u201d to make the posts available while NHS<\/a> providers grappled with the financial fallout from industrial action.<\/p>\n

Gunn, 27, had hoped to secure a post in paediatrics or emergency medicine. Resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, are in the first years of their career, with many on fixed-term contracts. The withdrawal of the new roles means Gunn will have no job to go to when hers ends in August. Yet she remains supportive of the strikes and says she \u201cabsolutely\u201d plans to take part.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was quite appalled that the government felt they could basically gamble with patient safety and care,\u201d says Gunn, who lives in Oxford. \u201cAt the end of the day, it is them that suffer. Me not getting into training means there is one less doctor who is able to see these patients.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen families are worried that their kids are unwell and they can\u2019t see a doctor, when patients are waiting 12-plus hours in A&E, I\u2019m at home because I\u2019m not able to be there, I\u2019m not able to work and see these patients. I\u2019m disgusted the government thinks it\u2019s a bargaining chip they can play around with.\u201d<\/p>\n

The government said a move to permanent contracts was on the table before the talks collapsed. \u201cIt was exactly these sort of reforms that the offer proposed to deliver, in the absence of disruptive strike action,\u201d one source familiar with the negotiations said.<\/p>\n

However, pay remains the main sticking point. The government argues that resident doctors would in effect have had a 35% pay rise over the last four years if the BMA had accepted the latest deal on offer. This year, most doctors have been offered a 3.5% increase, higher than the 3.3% being offered to some other NHS workers. Streeting said in his letter to the BMA that the lowest-paid resident doctors had been offered a pay rise of as much as 7.1%.<\/p>\n

Yet the BMA wants the government to work towards restoring pay to 2008 levels, which would mean a further 26% rise after inflation is taken into account. Gunn and her colleagues feel this is more pressing than ever, given the pressure on the global economy amid the war in Iran. For its part, the government has taken issue with the fact that the BMA calculates its pay erosion claims on the basis of the retail prices index, saying it is out of date and inaccurate. The BMA says it uses this method because it is also used to calculate interest on student loans.<\/p>\n

The union adds that as well as a real-terms cut in pay, doctors have experienced a deterioration in working conditions. It has warned that more doctors could leave the UK if the situation is not resolved.<\/p>\n

Resident doctors on strike outside St Thomas\u2019 hospital in London last November. Photograph: Anadolu\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

Gunn says: \u201cEvery time the government says they don\u2019t have enough money for pay restoration, [NHS trusts] are spending millions of pounds getting locums at enhanced rates for people to cover the strikes, so there is money there. People felt they did have money to put into those extra 1,000 places. For them to turn around at the last minute and say the money is not there any more \u2013 it\u2019s a poor excuse.\u201d<\/p>\n

Another government source said officials were struggling to understand why talks had collapsed at the 11th hour. \u201cIt felt like we were getting somewhere, and at the last minute it all fell apart, and we\u2019re not sure why,\u201d they said. Streeting has argued that resident doctors have been offered the highest pay rise in the public sector.<\/p>\n

This means there is disquiet among leaders of trade unions representing others NHS staff, as the Guardian reported on Saturday<\/a>, especially when some have been offered a lower pay-increase deal. \u201cThe deals we have been able to present to our members are becoming a much tougher sell,\u201d one said.<\/p>\n

The second government source added that the training places were \u201cfar more something the BMA asked for than something the NHS pressingly needs\u201d. They said: \u201cObviously, it\u2019s good to have more doctors in the workforce and give them these progression opportunities, but it\u2019s not like the NHS is going to fall apart because these 1,000 places don\u2019t exist.\u201d The government said in a statement that it was \u201cgrossly misleading\u201d to suggest patient safety would be affected by the withdrawal of the training places.<\/p>\n

Most of the public does not back the strikes. A poll of almost 7,000 people conducted by YouGov last month showed that 53% were opposed to the latest round of industrial action, with 31% saying they were strongly against it. During the strikes, some elective and non-urgent care is postponed, meaning patients can face a longer wait for treatment, although the NHS says it works to minimise disruption.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s incredibly frustrating when things like elective work are cancelled,\u201d Gunn admits. \u201cHowever, I think that when the public understands that the government is holding jobs to ransom [and] it\u2019s gambling with their care, the hope is the public can see why we are striking; it\u2019s in their best interests. We want to be experts in our fields so we can give them top-quality care.\u201d<\/p>\n

A health department spokesperson said: \u201cThe BMA chose to press ahead with damaging strike action rather than support a credible offer that would have drastically improved the pay, working lives and career opportunities of its members, and failed to present any counterproposal. We urge the BMA to reconsider and work with us to reach an agreement that delivers for their members and for patients.\u201d<\/p>\n

With both sides seemingly unwilling to give ground, the future of Gunn and many of her colleagues is uncertain. Whether support for continued strikes holds up remains to be seen. Turnout in BMA ballots over resident doctors\u2019 pay has declined significantly since the first strikes in early 2023.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019ve spent many years at university to study to be a doctor; I have three degrees; I am committed to medicine,\u201d Gunn says. \u201cCome August I will be unemployed, when there are thousands of patients coming into the hospital every day, waiting to be seen. It\u2019s heartbreaking, with all of the sacrifices I\u2019ve made in my personal life, not to get into training.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"After almost two years on the NHS frontline as a resident doctor, Heather Gunn says she is bracing…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":517172,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,57,58,50,56,54,55],"class_list":{"0":"post-517171","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-united-kingdom","8":"tag-gb","9":"tag-great-britain","10":"tag-greatbritain","11":"tag-news","12":"tag-uk","13":"tag-united-kingdom","14":"tag-unitedkingdom"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/517171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=517171"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/517171\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/517172"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=517171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=517171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=517171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}