{"id":519790,"date":"2026-04-08T15:51:13","date_gmt":"2026-04-08T15:51:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/519790\/"},"modified":"2026-04-08T15:51:13","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T15:51:13","slug":"if-peaceful-gaza-protest-is-criminal-what-is-left-of-uk-freedom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/519790\/","title":{"rendered":"If Peaceful Gaza Protest is Criminal, What is Left of UK Freedom?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This week, in Westminster Magistrates\u2019 Court, two fellow civil society leaders \u2014 Ben Jamal and Chris Nineham \u2014 were <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newarab.com\/news\/uk-court-finds-pro-palestine-organisers-guilty-rule-breach\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">convicted<\/a> for actions they took as part of a peaceful protest. Their conviction marks a chilling moment for democratic rights in the United Kingdom, sending a stark and ominous message about the shrinking space for dissent.<\/p>\n<p>Jamal\u202fand Nineham, were convicted for failing to comply with conditions that had been imposed on a peaceful protest and, in Jamal\u2019s case, inciting others to do so. The incident <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hrw.org\/report\/2026\/01\/08\/silencing-the-streets\/the-right-to-protest-under-attack-in-the-united-kingdom\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">involved<\/a> Jamal and Nineham attempting to take a small group to lay flowers in memory of Palestinians in Gaza to the BBC, which was beyond the police line, and if permission was refused, at the feet of police officers.  \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>They were sentenced to 18 and 12 months conditional discharge respectively. They are each required to pay \u00a37500 in prosecution costs.<\/p>\n<p>That such an act has led to criminal conviction, hefty fees, and lengthy conditional discharge periods should alarm anyone who believes in our basic democratic human right to protest.<\/p>\n<p>Jamal is chief executive of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), and Nineham is vice-chair of the Stop the War Coalition. They have been involved in organising mass, mostly peaceful protests of thousands of people in the UK against Israel\u2019s atrocities over the last two years. Their conviction raises a troubling question: what does this mean for civil society in a country that is increasingly treating protest and dissent as crimes?<\/p>\n<p>In the recent Human Rights Watch <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hrw.org\/report\/2026\/01\/08\/silencing-the-streets\/the-right-to-protest-under-attack-in-the-united-kingdom\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">report<\/a> Silencing the Streets, we highlighted Jamal and Nineham\u2019s case as emblematic of the sweeping powers police now possess to strangle peaceful protest. Police justified banning the original march route on the grounds that it might cause \u201cserious disruption\u201d but provided no coherent criteria for what constitutes serious disruption and ignored offers to alter the route or timing to address their concerns.<\/p>\n<p>The court emphasised that protest rights, while fundamental, are not absolute. But in balancing competing rights, the state has a <a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-57558\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">positive obligation<\/a> not just to prevent disruption, but to facilitate peaceful protest. That balance appears to have been discarded in this case.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In recent years, the UK has significantly expanded police powers to restrict protest, and our current government is accelerating that effort. While officials have presented it as a response to public order and safety concerns, legislation currently making its way through Parliament would further extend police discretion over protests \u2014 including the criteria for curtailing the right to assembly, the conditions that can be imposed, and how broad and vague those conditions can be.<\/p>\n<p>The danger goes beyond any single protest. It is a reshaping of a culture \u2013 one in which protest and dissent may become hesitant, more conditional, and ultimately more easily deterred.<\/p>\n<p>The recent judgment will not end with Ben Jamal and Chris Nineham. Such prosecutions can deter protest. Jamal and Nineham\u2019s lawyer told the court that their organisations would be unable to pay the prosecution\u2019s costs and would have to crowdfund for any such orders imposed. One is left to wonder whether that chilling effect is not incidental, but the point.<\/p>\n<p>This would be troubling at any time, but it is particularly so now, given the context in which these protests are taking place, and the contrasting approach of the government to suppressing protest with its failure to uphold international law.<\/p>\n<p>Jamal and Nineham have been convicted of a criminal offence after peacefully protesting against a catalogue of crimes that Israel has committed in Gaza and the West Bank. This contrasts with the few meaningful steps the UK government has taken to hold Israel accountable under international law. Limited measures\u2014such as the suspension of some arms export licences and targeted sanctions\u2014 are woefully inadequate alongside the continued supply of components for F-35 fighter jets, ongoing trade with illegal Israeli settlements, and failure to take other meaningful steps to implement the July 2024 International Court of Justice (ICJ) advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel\u2019s policies and practices in the OPT.<\/p>\n<p>The contradiction is stark. Protesters calling attention to atrocities face jail time; the state that is committing these crimes receives little more than toothless <a href=\"https:\/\/onu.delegfrance.org\/the-situation-in-palestine\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">statements<\/a> of condemnation.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Beyond atrocities in Gaza, the Israeli government is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2026\/jan\/06\/israel-vast-illegal-settlement-west-bank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">pushing ahead<\/a> with a vast settlement project in the heart of the West Bank, long considered a \u201cred line\u201d by the international community because it would sever the northern part of the West Bank from the southern part.<\/p>\n<p>Discussing the plan in March, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich boasted it would \u201cin practical terms nullify the cursed Oslo Accords\u2026while encouraging [Palestinian] emigration from both Gaza and Judea and Samaria [the West Bank]\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, restricting protest does not merely raise domestic human rights concerns; it risks weakening scrutiny of serious violations of international law and shielding UK officials from democratic accountability for failing to address atrocities.<\/p>\n<p>It is not only the freedom of Jamal and Nineham that is at stake but the very direction of this country. When peaceful protest is constrained, it is not just campaigners or activists who suffer\u2014it is the health of democracy itself.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>It is not too late for\u202fKeir Starmer\u2019s government to change direction and take a stand for human rights, democracy, and international law. That would mean both abandoning the criminalisation of peaceful protests and pursuing justice abroad. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The government should be responding to peaceful protests about international crimes by finding ways to hold Israel to account and to end all risks of complicity in atrocities. Criminalising peaceful protesters and civil society leaders is never the answer. It undermines British values, British democracy, and is a weapon of tyranny.<\/p>\n<p>It doesn\u2019t belong here.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"This week, in Westminster Magistrates\u2019 Court, two fellow civil society leaders \u2014 Ben Jamal and Chris Nineham \u2014&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":519791,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[59,57,58,50,56,54,55],"class_list":{"0":"post-519790","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-united-kingdom","8":"tag-gb","9":"tag-great-britain","10":"tag-greatbritain","11":"tag-news","12":"tag-uk","13":"tag-united-kingdom","14":"tag-unitedkingdom"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519790","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=519790"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519790\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/519791"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=519790"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=519790"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=519790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}