{"id":580051,"date":"2026-05-12T15:48:09","date_gmt":"2026-05-12T15:48:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/580051\/"},"modified":"2026-05-12T15:48:09","modified_gmt":"2026-05-12T15:48:09","slug":"birds-never-evolved-perfect-wings-study-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/580051\/","title":{"rendered":"Birds Never Evolved &#8216;Perfect&#8217; Wings, Study Finds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bird physiology is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nhm.ac.uk\/discover\/how-did-birds-and-other-dinosaurs-learn-to-fly.html\" rel=\"false nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">conducive to flight<\/a>: small size, hollow bones, and generally symmetrical feathers on the wings and tail. It seems like a no-brainer that bird evolution was optimized for flight, but a new study suggests that things aren\u2019t as clear-cut as they appear.<\/p>\n<p>The conclusion of a recent study in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41467-026-70692-w\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Nature Communications<\/a> sounds rather unintuitive: most bird wings don\u2019t appear to be built for maximum flight efficiency and aren\u2019t perfectly fine-tuned for the way birds fly.\u00a0What\u2019s more, the birds with the most optimized wing shapes in the study were hummingbirds and penguins\u2014with the latter using their wings for proficient swimming, not flying through the air. The researchers analyzed 1,139 images of bird wings with a method that allowed them to test the relative performance of different wing shapes without presumptions on what constituted an \u201coptimal\u201d wing shape.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor many birds, the functional constraints of flight\u2014the need to generate lift, overcome drag, and turn tightly\u2014do not strongly influence the shape of the wing,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/research-information.bris.ac.uk\/en\/persons\/benton-walters\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Benton Walters<\/a>, a doctoral researcher at the University of Bristol in the U.K., told Gizmodo. \u201cFor some groups, these pressures have resulted in the evolution of optimal wing shapes, but this is the exception rather than the rule.\u201d<\/p>\n<p> Two wings and a prayer <\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s a surprisingly active, heated debate on why some animals evolved to fly. The discourse dates back to the 1880s, but the hypotheses aren\u2019t testable, so it\u2019s a \u201cpointless debate,\u201d according to the late ornithologist John Hutchinson in a blog post for the <a href=\"https:\/\/ucmp.berkeley.edu\/vertebrates\/flight\/origins.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">University of California\u2019s Museum of Paleontology<\/a>. So instead, Hutchinson added, researchers like to focus on what features enable flight. For modern birds, wings are the \u201cstructures underpinning flight,\u201d the paper explained, and birds have \u201cadopted a diverse array of flight styles and high wing shape variability.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But the more researchers dug into this diversity, the less certain they became about the evolutionary path that led to modern bird wings.<\/p>\n<p> Wings are made\u2026to fly? <\/p>\n<p>Walters and colleagues sought to test the traditional, and arguably intuitive, assumption that bird wings evolved to be best optimized for flight. Simply, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nhm.ac.uk\/discover\/what-is-natural-selection.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">natural selection<\/a> dictates that being better suited to the environment and lifestyle increases an animal\u2019s chances of survival. If flight helps birds evade predators or cold weather and find better food, wouldn\u2019t there be a natural incentive for wings to become the best versions of themselves?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is called <a href=\"https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/adaptationism\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">adaptationist<\/a> thinking,\u201d Walters told Gizmodo. \u201cSince flying is a demanding mode of travel and has changed the bird body plan extensively over the 100 million years or so that they have existed, birds should have evolved optimally shaped wings.\u201d<\/p>\n<p> Define \u2018optimal\u2019 <\/p>\n<p>But it\u2019s typically \u201cvery difficult, if not impossible, to determine if an animal is optimal, because there is no way of knowing from looking at living animals alone if the best shape observed is the best overall,\u201d Walters said. To circumvent this challenge, the team chose theoretical morphospace analysis. This method identifies the best evolved shape for a particular flight style, as opposed to assuming that a bird\u2019s current wing shape is the most optimal.<\/p>\n<p> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-2000757214 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/theoretical-morphospace-analysis-bird-wing-shape-1280x619.jpg\" alt=\"Theoretical Morphospace Analysis Bird Wing Shape\" width=\"1280\" height=\"619\"  \/>A sample workflow for theoretical morphospace analysis. \u00a9 Walters et al., 2026 <\/p>\n<p>The study analyzed 1,139 images of bird wings and also considered \u201cspecialist\u201d flight styles like dynamic soaring and flight styles of species that migrate long distances, Walters said. As expected, flightless birds like ostriches had wings that were \u201cquite unoptimal,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>But the analysis did find bird species whose empirical wing shape closely resembled the predicted optimal wing shape, namely members of the hummingbird and penguin families. Birds with flight styles with high energy demand, such as aerial hawking, also tended to have better optimization. As expected, flightless birds like ostriches had wings that were \u201cquite unoptimal,\u201d Walters explained.<\/p>\n<p> Evolution is complicated <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-2000757216 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/bird-wingspan-analysis-336x224.jpg\" alt=\"Bird Wingspan Analysis\" width=\"336\" height=\"224\"  \/>How bird wings change shape as they evolve up the path towards more optimal, higher regions. Credit: Beau Jones\/University of Bristol <\/p>\n<p>Generally speaking, however, it seemed that for most birds \u201cgood enough is good enough when it comes to flight,\u201d Walters said in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bristol.ac.uk\/news\/2026\/may\/most-birds-have-not-evolvedoptimalwing-shapes-for-flight-study-finds.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">university statement<\/a>. That\u2019s even true for the albatross, a specialized long-distance flier that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.guinnessworldrecords.com\/world-records\/fastest-bird-level-flight\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">holds the Guinness World Record<\/a> for its great aviation skills.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat prevents them from being more optimal is likely that they have to land, something that albatrosses already have a hard time with but is necessary to breed,\u201d he mused. \u201cA theoretical albatross with an even thinner, longer, more optimal wing may not be able to safely take off and land and thus wouldn\u2019t survive, despite being better shaped for flight.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe study uses an interesting approach that enriches our knowledge of flight in birds,\u201d <a href=\"http:\/\/palaeopittman.com\/2025\/12\/01\/team\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Michael Pittman<\/a>, a paleobiologist at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, told Gizmodo in an email. \u201cThere is still a lot to learn about bird flight and plenty of untapped potential for using this knowledge to deliver bioinspired engineering solutions for society,\u201d added Pittman, who wasn\u2019t involved in the new study.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the findings demonstrate that a \u201clogical\u201d hypothesis might not necessarily be what nature intended. Many human designs, like airplane wings and propellers, are modeled after birds, but we might want to be \u201cselective about what animals inspiration is drawn from,\u201d Walters said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bird physiology is conducive to flight: small size, hollow bones, and generally symmetrical feathers on the wings and&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":580052,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[4390,59,80431,90,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-580051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-science","tag-evolution","tag-gb","tag-ornithology","tag-science","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/580051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=580051"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/580051\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/580052"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=580051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=580051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=580051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}