Drug diversion schemes led by police that steer people away from the criminal justice system and into treatment and education services are significantly more effective in reducing reoffending than prosecution, according to a new analysis.<\/p>\n
Researchers examined outcomes across 13 English police forces and more than 62,000 criminal incidents over the past four years, finding that people whose cases were dealt with through decriminalisation-style diversion schemes were a third less likely to reoffend than similar individuals prosecuted for drug possession.<\/p>\n
A number of police forces in England use formal diversion schemes<\/a> for people caught in possession of drugs, notably Durham, the West Midlands and Thames Valley. But many forces, even if would-be offenders are not often sent to prison for simple possession offences today, still officially take a law-and-order approach towards illegal drug use.<\/p>\n Prof Alex Stevens<\/a>, the acting director of the University of Sheffield\u2019s Centre for Criminological Research, who led the research, said: \u201cThe evidence is now strong enough that all police forces can be confident in adopting and expanding diversion schemes for people caught in possession of drugs.\u201d<\/p>\n The researchers who conducted the four-year, first-of-its-kind study, funded<\/a> by the Cabinet Office\u2019s evaluation accelerator fund, are working with the National Police Chiefs\u2019 Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing to help police forces countrywide to adopt police-led drug diversion.<\/p>\n Quantitative data was collected over four years on a cohort of people who were contacted by police forces between October 2021 and September 2022.<\/p>\n Commander Alison Heydari, the NPCC lead for out-of-court resolutions (OOCRs), said the study highlighted the effectiveness of diversion. \u201cThrough the \u2018national OOCR strategy\u2019, there is a clear commitment to ensuring that eligible individuals are consistently offered appropriate alternatives to prosecution, helping to prevent reoffending while also addressing disparities in outcomes,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n The researchers, however, found that diversion was being used far less than it could be, even in police forces with established diversion schemes, with only a minority of eligible cases diverted as officers chose not to divert eligible offenders. \u201cPolice forces now have an opportunity to reduce their costs \u2013 and pressure on the courts \u2013 by making more use of diversion,\u201d said Stevens, who quit the government\u2019s expert advisory council on drugs<\/a> in 2019 over the \u201cpolitical vetting\u201d of candidates. \u201cThis will require clear leadership, proper training, and a shift in culture at street level.\u201d<\/p>\n Jason Kew, a former DCI at Thames Valley police who led the development of its pre-arrest drug diversion scheme, said forces that embedded diversion schemes could go further still and develop specialist pathways for women.<\/p>\n \u201cGetting this right means fewer women in custody, fewer children lost to the system \u2013 and stronger, healthier communities,\u201d said Kew, now a senior practice specialist at the Centre for Justice Innovation. \u201cThe question is no longer whether diversion works. It is how boldly we choose to build on it.\u201d<\/p>\n The report also said that people in the most deprived neighbourhoods were most heavily policed and least likely to be diverted, and that black people were less likely to be diverted than white people for similar offences.<\/p>\n