Key events<\/p>\n
Council officials in Makerfield say they expect the result around 3am, my colleague Josh Halliday, who\u2019s at the count, tells me.<\/p>\n
Here are some more pictures from the count venue.<\/p>\n
Votes being counted in the Makerfield byelection at the Edge Wigan in Wigan. Photograph: Temilade Adelaja\/ReutersVotes being counted in the Makerfield byelection at the Edge Wigan in Wigan. Photograph: Temilade Adelaja\/ReutersVotes being counted in the Makerfield byelection at the Edge Wigan in Wigan. Photograph: Temilade Adelaja\/ReutersVotes being counted in the Makerfield byelection at the Edge Wigan in Wigan. Photograph: Victoria Jones\/ShutterstockShare<\/a><\/p>\n David Blunkett, the former Labour cabinet minister, has suggested that Keir Starmer should stand down after the Makerfield byelection<\/a>.<\/p>\n In an interview on the BBC\u2019s Newsnight, Blunkett suggested that Starmer standing aside would be the best option for the party regardless of whether Andy Burnham<\/a> wins tonight or loses.<\/p>\n Speaking about what should happen if Burnham were to win, Blunkett said \u201cthe obvious and most beneficial outcome\u201d would be an agreement between Starmer and Burnham about the timetable for a transition. He said Starmer himself had said politicians should \u201cput the country first\u201d, and he said this would be far preferable to ministers resigning to force Starmer out.<\/p>\n And, if Burnham were to lose, there would have to be \u201ca complete rethink\u201d by Labour<\/a>, he said, suggesting Starmer would also have to go.<\/p>\n Burnham used to be Blunkett\u2019s parliamentary private secretary and Blunkett praised him as someone who had \u201cgrown in stature\u201d over the past 20 years.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Votes being counted at the Makerfield byelection. Photograph: Temilade Adelaja\/ReutersShare<\/a>Will Makerfield really be the most consequential byelection in British history?<\/p>\n The Makerfield byelection<\/a> has regularly been described as potentially the most consequential byelection in British history. People have written that on the assumption that Andy Burnham will win, and that he will replace Keir Starmer as PM. While those both seem to be reasonable assumptions, in a country with a history of parliamentary government as long as Britain\u2019s a description of any event that involves saying it is the most consequential ever is probably not strictly accurate.<\/p>\n Here are just a handful examples of other byelections that have been similar to this one in some respects, or highly influential.<\/p>\n Byelections involving potential party leaders<\/p>\n In Makerfield Burnham supporters think they are voting for the next Labour leader, and Keir Starmer<\/a> has had to support the Labour candidate while at the same time fearing him as a rival. Neil Kinnock was in a similar position at the 1984 Chesterfield byelection, which was won by Tony Benn, hero of the Labour left. Benn might have beaten Kinnock in the Labour leadership election a year earlier had he not lost his seat in the general election. He was still seen as a rival in 1984 but the byelection win did not propel him to the leadership and, when there was a contest in 1988, Kinnock beat him easily.<\/p>\n William Hague, the then Tory leader, must have had similar emotions when Michael Portillo contested the 1999 Kensington and Chelsea byelection. Portillo too had missed a leadership election he might have won because he had been out of parliament in a general election. A few months later Hague promoted Portillo to shadow chancellor and deputy leader in the hope of neutralising a rival, but Portillo\u2019s influence had peaked and in a subsequent contest he was beaten by Iain Duncan Smith.<\/p>\n Byelections that choose prime ministers<\/p>\n Makerfield might be electing not just a party leader, but a future prime minister. This is not unprecedented because at the 1963 Kinross and Perthshire byelection voters elected an actual prime minister, Alec Douglas-Home. He had been chosen by the Tories as PM three weeks earlier, but at that point he was in the Lords. Taking advantage of legislation passed to help Tony Benn give up his peerage, he quit the Lords and entered the Commons after a Scottish Tory MP (George Younger \u2013 the Josh Simons of his day) sacrificed his seat for him .<\/p>\n There are other byelections that have been won by people who have gone on to serve as PM (like Robert Peel and Stanley Baldwin), but in British Byelections 1769-2025<\/a>, a brilliant selection of essays on this topic edited by Iain Dale, Alex Puffette argues that it was losing the 1899 Oldham byelection that was really important for Winston Churchill because it meant he was able to make his name as a star war correspondent in the Boer war which did more to benefit his career in the long run.<\/p>\n Byelections that bring down governments<\/p>\n Makerfield may lead to the replacement of Keir Starmer at PM. But it won\u2019t bring down the government, unlike the 1922 Newport byelection that led to Conservative MPs deciding to pull the plug on the Lloyd George-led coalition. Austen Chamberlain, the Tory leader at the time, expected Labour<\/a> to win, but the seat was won by an anti-coalition Unionist (Tory), and the party decided voters were fed up of the pact with the Liberals.<\/p>\n In more recent times the 1990 Eastbourne byelection defeat helped persuade the Tories that Margaret Thatcher had to go, and the 2022 Tiverton and Honiton byelection defeat, and the Wakefield byelection defeat on the same night, helped to finish off Boris Johnson.<\/p>\n Byelections that change policy<\/p>\n If Makerfield leads to Starmer being replaced by Burnham, government policy may change. But perhaps not be much. For a really consequential election, try going back almost 200 years to the 1828 County Clare byelection, which was won by the Irish Catholic Daniel O\u2019Connell (later known as \u201cthe liberator\u201d). As a Catholic, he was not allowed to take his seat in the Commons under the laws then in place. But his win led to the governmment passing Catholic emancipation, opening up most public offices to Catholics at a time when all of Ireland was ruled by London, and most of its population was barred from public life.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a017.57 EDT<\/p>\n On Newsnight Nicholas Watt, the programme\u2019s political editor, has said Reform UK are briefing that they think they will get their highest share of the vote in a byelection in Makerfield, beating the 39% that Sarah Pochin got when she won the Runcorn and Helsby byelection last year<\/a> (by six votes).<\/p>\n Runcorn and Helsby may have been a record for Reform UK. But Ukip, which in many respects was its predecessor party, got 60% of the vote in the Clacton byelection in 2014<\/a>.<\/p>\n The second Survation poll from the Makerfield byelection had Reform UK on 39% \u2013 but Labour on 49%. (See 10.39pm<\/a>.)<\/p>\n Share<\/a>What polls have said about likely voting in Makerfield<\/p>\n Robert Kenyon, the Reform UK candidate, says he is expecting a \u201cbig vote\u201d in Makerfield. (See 10.26am<\/a>.) That\u2019s a reasonable assumption. Two years ago, when he was the party\u2019s general election candidate, Kenyon came second here with 32% of the vote. (See 10.27pm<\/a>.) This time there have been five published byelection polls, from four polling companies, and all of them show Reform UK polling well above 32%.<\/p>\n But they also all show Labour<\/a> winning.<\/p>\n Here are the figures \u2013 in a chart posted by Mark Pack on his the Week in Polls Substack blog.<\/a><\/p>\n Makerfield polling Photograph: Mark Pack\u2019s Substack, the Week in Polls<\/p>\n The reason why Reform UK<\/a> can do much better than two years ago, but still lose, is because there seems to have been a lot of tactical voting \u2013 especially on the Labour\/progressive side. People who may have voted Lib Dem or Green two years ago seem to have been voting Labour.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>How Makerfield, Aberdeen South, and Arbroath and Broughty Ferry voted in 2024<\/p>\n For the record, here are the 2024 general election results in all three constituencies where byelections have taken place today.<\/p>\n Makerfield<\/p>\n Makerfield general election results Photograph: WikipediaLocation of Makerfield constituency Photograph: Wikipedia<\/p>\n Aberdeen South<\/p>\n Aberdeen South general elections results Photograph: WikipediaLocation of Aberdeen South constituency Photograph: Wikipedia<\/p>\n Arbroath and Broughty Ferry<\/p>\n Abroath and Broughty Ferry general election results Photograph: WikipediaLocation of Arbroath and Broughty Ferry constitutency Photograph: WikipediaShare<\/a>Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon says he’s confident of getting ‘big vote’ in Makerfield byelection<\/p>\n Andy Burnham has posted this message<\/a> on social media.<\/p>\n double quotation markA huge thanks to the people of the Makerfield constituency for your patience and good humour over the last five weeks. My thanks too to the many volunteers who came up to support my campaign. We ran a very positive one and can be proud of it!<\/p>\n Image with Burnham’s end-of-poll tweet Photograph: Andy Burnham<\/p>\n Would Burnham be saying thank you to the constituency if he thought he had lost?<\/p>\n And here is the message<\/a> from Burnham\u2019s main rival, Robert Kenyon, the Reform UK candidate.<\/p>\n double quotation markThis photo was taken on the day I decided to stand in Makerfield.<\/p>\n I am confident of a big vote for Reform tonight. Thank you to everyone who placed their faith in me.<\/p>\n From changing boilers to changing politics, this is something I will never forget!<\/p>\n Picture of Kenyon he posted with his end-of-poll tweet Photograph: Robert KenyonShare<\/a>Deputy Labour leader Lucy Powell says Labour has spoken to ‘record number of residents’ in ‘positive campaign’<\/p>\n Labour has just released this statement from Lucy Powell, the party\u2019s deputy leader (and a friend and supporter of Andy Burnham\u2019s), about the campaign. She said:<\/p>\n double quotation markOur great candidate, Andy Burnham, and our fantastic Labour team have run a positive campaign focused on the people of the Makerfield constituency.<\/p>\n We knew this would be a tough fight, given Reform did so well here just a few weeks ago, but the Labour movement came together to show we are well up for that fight. While it will be some hours before we know the result, I want to say a huge thank you to the hundreds and hundreds of activists and volunteers who have helped with this campaign. Together, we\u2019ve spoken to a record number of residents and shared our Labour message of hope and optimism.<\/p>\n Labour will continue working every day for the people of this country, putting our values into action and delivering the fairer future communities want to see.<\/p>\n It is hard to read much into this, but if the party was expecting to lose, there would be rather more about the \u201ctough fight\u201d in the statement.<\/p>\n The line about speaking to a \u201crecord number of residents\u201d is no idle boast. Earlier my colleague Jessica Elgot posted these<\/a> about the campaign effort today.<\/p>\n double quotation markNever seen anything like this as a Labour ground operation. 120 contacts a minute, three campaign centres, 3000 activists.<\/p>\n At 6.30pm, two activists told me there is \u201cno one left to knock.\u201d<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Burnham brings in top economists before possible leadership run<\/p>\n Three economic heavyweights have been brought in to advise Andy Burnham as he attempts to reassure the markets before his possible return to parliament on Friday and challenge to Keir Starmer<\/a>, Rowena Mason reports.<\/p>\n Burnham is understood to be getting advice from Andy Haldane<\/a>, a former Bank of England chief economist, as well as Richard Hughes, a former chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility and Jim O\u2019Neill, a crossbench peer and former Treasury minister who worked on George Osborne\u2019s Northern Powerhouse.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Polls close in historic Makerfield byelection that could see Andy Burnham elected and pave way for end of Starmer<\/p>\n Good evening, and welcome to the Guardian\u2019s Makerfield byelection<\/a> live blog. The polls have just closed and we may have to wait until around dawn (quite early in the summer, of course) until we get a result. But, as the votes are counted, it should become clear well before then who is going to win. Andy Burnham, the Labour former cabinet minister, current mayor of Greater Manchester, and potential future prime minister, is widely expected to be the new MP, but at this point no one knows for sure.<\/p>\n Here is our latest story about what has been happening today, and what may unfold in the hours to come.<\/p>\n This byelection has been widely described as the most consequential byelection in British history. That\u2019s probably an over-statement, but more on that later. Nevertheless, it is definitely one for the history books, because it is expected to lead to the replacement of Keir Starmer<\/a> as PM.<\/p>\n During the night we will get the result; ultimately democratic politics is all about numbers, and these numbers really will matter. In his Spectator cover story<\/a>, Tim Shipman has a good explanation as to why.<\/p>\n double quotation markAt the time of going to print, Op Makerfield is not a totally done deal. Two of Burnham\u2019s top team parrot the same line: \u2018It\u2019s closer than you think.\u2019 But those advising the Manchester mayor think the scale of any win will determine the speed of events. \u2018If he wins by low single digits, Keir Starmer digs in and says: \u201cYou can\u2019t come for me until after the Manchester mayoral election on 30 July,\u201d and it\u2019s bloody trench warfare,\u2019 one says. \u2018If it\u2019s a comfortable, single-digits win, the soft left will try to take power through a conversation, but they will probably discover that power has to be taken by force. If Andy gets more than Reform plus Restore combined, start the clock. There will be an avalanche.\u2019<\/p>\n Voting figures are very specific but, as for what happens next, there is a lot less clarity. Overnight, and during Friday, we might get a slightly clearer idea, but it is quite possible that by this time tomorrow there will still be considerable uncertainty as to how a Burnham\/Starmer power struggle may unfold. Pippa Crerar had a superb account of the state of play in her Guardian splash this morning.<\/p>\n Of course, it is possible Reform UK<\/a> could win. That would also lead to immense turmoil for Labour \u2013 with less prospect of a positive resolution for the party.<\/p>\n Although we will be focusing on Makerfield, there are two other byelections tonight, in Aberdeen<\/a> South, and Arbroath and Broughty Ferry. We will be covering those too.<\/p>\n At 11.10pm the BBC will be launching its byelection programme, hosted by Laura Kuenssberg. As for when the results will come, we\u2019ve been told around 1.30am for Aberdeen South, around 3am to 4am for Makerfield and around the same for Arbroath and Broughty Ferry. But these estimates are never very reliable.<\/p>\n We hope to turn comments on in the morning. Overnight, if you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X<\/a>, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.<\/p>\n I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can\u2019t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.<\/p>\n