![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/706.jpg\")
Photograph: ONS<\/p>\nIntroduction: UK borrowing surges over forecasts in May<\/p>\n
Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy.<\/p>\n
The health of the British economy is centre stage today, as Andy Burnham wins the Makerfield by-election and declared that the Labour party has a \u201cfinal chance to change\u201d.<\/p>\n
But the latest public finances, just released, show the challenges facing whoever is in Downing Street.<\/p>\n
Britain borrowed \u00a323.3bn in May to cover the difference between government income and spending \u2013 a surge of \u00a35.4bn more than a year ago.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s the highest borrowing for any May since 2020, when the Covid-19 lockdown was in force.<\/p>\n
Worryingly, it\u2019s also also \u00a35.6bn more than the \u00a317.7bn forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the UK\u2019s fiscal watchdog.<\/p>\n
This means government borrowing for this financial year (since April) is running \u00a37.7bn over the OBR\u2019s forecasts \u2013 at \u00a346.3bn.<\/p>\n
That raises the risk that borrowing could be higher than forecast by the next budget, risking breaking Rachel Reeves\u2019s fiscal rules \u2013 unless, of course, there is a leadership battle, and a new chancellor by the autumn\u2026<\/p>\n
The bigger picture is that this pushes the UK\u2019s national debt up to 95.1% of GDP, levels last seen in the early 1960s<\/p>\n
Photograph: ONS<\/p>\n
ONS senior statistician Tom Davies says:<\/p>\n
double quotation mark\u201cBorrowing in the first two months of the financial year was nearly \u00a39 billion higher than the same period of 2025.<\/p>\n
\u201cSpending on debt interest, public services, investment and benefits all increased in May 2026, compared with last May, more than outweighing higher tax receipts.\u201d<\/p>\n
The agenda<\/p>\n
7am BST: UK retail sales report for May<\/p>\n
7am BST: UK public finances report for May<\/p>\n
11.30am BST: Bank of Russia interest rate decision<\/p>\n
Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a003.03 EDT<\/p>\n Key events<\/p>\n UK two-year gilt yield rises to one-week high after by-election and borrowing data<\/p>\n A week is a long time in politics, and also in the bond markets!<\/p>\n Reuters has spotted that short-term British government bond yields have risen \u2060to a one-week high on Friday, increasing \u2060slightly more \u2060than those \u200bfor German debt, after this morning\u2019s higher-than-expected borrowing numbers and an \u2060election victory for Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham.<\/p>\n Two-year gilt \u2060yields rose to their highest \u200bsince June 12 \u200cat 4.25%, up more \u200cthan 6 basis points on the day and rising around 2 bps more than equivalent German bonds.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a003.50 EDT<\/p>\n Water company shares drop after Burnham win<\/p>\n Shares in UK water companies are dropping in early trading, as Andy Burnham\u2019s by-election win raises the prospect of nationalisation.<\/p>\n United Utilities, which provides water and wastewater services in the North West of England, are down 1.3%.<\/p>\n Severn Trent, which operates across the Midlands, South West, and Wales, are down 1.2%<\/p>\n Last weekend, the Guardian reported that bringing water and energy into public control would be at the heart of Burnham\u2019s agenda should he become prime minister.<\/p>\n Several close allies of Burnham have said he wants to take over broad swathes of UK utilities in an effort to improve performance and potentially reduce bills for consumers, with one saying:<\/p>\n double quotation mark\u201cWhen Andy says he wants the public to have control over \u2018the essentials of life\u2019, we should believe him. He is completely serious.\u201d<\/p>\n That process would involve the government taking over water companies as they either fail (yes you, Thames Water<\/a>) or their franchises come up for renewal.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>UK bond yields on the rise<\/p>\n British government borrowing costs have jumped at the start of trading in the bond market.<\/p>\n Investors are digesting the jump in UK\u2019s budget deficit in May, Andy Burnham\u2019s victory in Makerfield, and a breakdown in the US-Iran peace talks.<\/p>\n The yield, or interest rate, on UK 10-year bonds has risen by 5 basis points (0.05 of a percentage point) to 4.799%.<\/p>\n 30-year bond yields are up almost 6bps, at 5.5%.<\/p>\n Traders could be concluding that a Burnham premiership (should he win a leadership battle) might increase spending and borrowing, which would push up bond yields.<\/p>\n But\u2026 other government bond yields are also rising, although not quite as rapidly as for UK bonds. German 10-year bund yields are up 3.5bps this morning.<\/p>\n That tracks a rise in the Brent crude oil price, back over $80 a barrel, after planned peace talks between the US \u2060 \u2060and \u200bIran in Switzerland<\/a> today were cancelled as Hezbollah targeted Israeli forces and Israel carried out a wave of airstrikes in south Lebanon which killed at least 16 people.<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Conservatives: Borrowing is out of control<\/p>\n Shadow chancellor Mel Stride has claimed that UK borrowing is \u2018out of control\u2019, saying:<\/p>\n double quotation markBorrowing is out of control – up by 30% compared to last year – and now we\u2019re about to see what a real left wing Labour government looks like under Andy Burnham.<\/p>\n Burnham claims he is committed to the fiscal rules, yet when asked he could not even say what they are. The bond markets are watching nervously and we have already been paying a Burnham Penalty on our borrowing costs. Meanwhile, Reform have been busy pledging tens of billions in unfunded promises in their desperation to win in Makerfield.<\/p>\n The Conservatives are the only party with a plan to balance the books by getting spending under control, especially the welfare bill, in line with our Golden Economic Rule.<\/p>\n [Reminder, the national debt rose, from 65% of GDP to 94% of GDP, during the Conservative\u2019s last stint in power, from 2010 to 2024]<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a003.25 EDT<\/p>\n Chief Secretary to the Treasury Lucy Rigby has pinned the blame for the rise in borrowing on the Middle Est crisis, saying:<\/p>\n double quotation mark\u201cInflation has held steady and unemployment has fallen this week, but the war in the Middle East has clearly had an impact on economies around the world.<\/p>\n \u201cWe have the right economic plan to deal with these challenges \u2013 protecting families and businesses from rising costs, while cutting borrowing at a faster rate than any other G7 economy.\u201d<\/p>\n [Reminder: increased inflation drove up the cost of repaying index-linked government bonds<\/a>]<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a003.12 EDT<\/p>\n Hot weather boosts UK retail salesShoppers in Peascod Street in Windsor on 30 May Photograph: Maureen McLean\/Shutterstock<\/p>\n There is some encouraging economic news this morning \u2013 retail spending across Britain jumped by 1.2% in May.<\/p>\n Hot weather and sales offers encouraged consumers into the shops last month, meaning retail sales volumes more than bounced back after a 1% fall in April. Volumes were 3.2% higher than in May 2025.<\/p>\n Retailers reported that hot weather in May boosted sales of items such as fans and paddling pools, according to the Office for National Statistics, with department stores also benefiting from promotions and the hot weather.<\/p>\n Hai-Ly Nguyen, associate partner at McKinsey & Company<\/a> says:<\/p>\n double quotation mark\u201cRetail sales volumes rose 3.2% year-on-year, helped by the hottest UK May day on record and a late bank holiday. But, if you look at the three-month trend, sales are up just 0.4%, pointing to a heat-driven spike rather than a turning point.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cDepartment stores and online drove the lift. For non-store retailers they saw a 6.1% monthly rise, the largest since February 2025, taking online share to 28.8%. That channel shift is being reinforced by a structural one: our European research<\/a> shows 38% of consumers now use AI to decide what to buy, with 63% to compare brands, prices and reviews.\u201d<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a002.47 EDT<\/p>\n Why Andy Burnham\u2019s by-election victory matters for the public finances<\/p>\n Martin Beck, chief economist at WPI Strategy, has warned that the underlying picture of the UK public finances \u201cremains uncomfortable\u201d, even if the US-Iran deal helps to ease inflation.<\/p>\n He points out:<\/p>\n double quotation markThe deficit is still large, debt interest is still absorbing a painful share of revenue, and the tax burden is already heading for post-war highs. There is no easy escape route through either borrowing or taxation.<\/p>\n \u201cThat is why Andy Burnham\u2019s by-election victory matters for the public finances. It does not change the arithmetic overnight, but it changes the politics around the arithmetic. A serious Labour leadership challenge would raise a simple question for markets: is the governing party about to shift towards higher spending, looser fiscal rules and a more relaxed attitude to borrowing?<\/p>\n \u201cBurnham\u2019s past argument that governments should not be \u201cin hock\u201d to bond markets may play well politically, but it is not a fiscal strategy. Any Prime Minister inheriting an annual deficit of well over \u00a3100bn would quickly discover that the gilt market is not an optional audience.<\/p>\n Beck concludes that the gilt market is now the hard constraint on British politics:<\/p>\n double quotation markA Burnham premiership might change the language of economic policy, but it would not abolish the arithmetic. The next Labour leader, whoever it is, will still face the same brutal equation: weak growth, high borrowing, expensive debt and very little room for manoeuvre.\u201d<\/p>\n Share<\/a>UK borrowing: what the experts say<\/p>\n Emeritus professor Joe Nellis, economic adviser at MHA, warns that the UK public finances are \u201cnot in comfortable territory\u201d, after borrowing jumped by \u00a35.4bn year-on-year last month:<\/p>\n double quotation markPublic sector net borrowing came in at \u00a323.3bn in May, showing the continuing pressure on the UK\u2019s public finances and the difficult choices that lie ahead for the government and the Treasury for the rest of this financial year.<\/p>\n Borrowing in May was only slightly below the exceptionally high level recorded for April, remaining very high by historical standards. The latest data once more highlight the difficulty of balancing public-sector spending requirements with the government\u2019s pledge to keep public finances on a sustainable path.<\/p>\n A number of factors continue to weigh heavily on the fiscal position. Debt interest payments remain elevated, public services are under significant strain, and weaker economic growth risks limiting the pace of tax revenue growth into the Treasury coffers. At the same time, seemingly unending demands for more and more spending, particularly on health, defence and infrastructure, show little sign of easing up.<\/p>\n The implications reach far beyond just the monthly borrowing numbers themselves. The figures will shape expectations about the Chancellor\u2019s room for manoeuvre ahead of the Autumn Budget and will influence decisions on taxation, public spending and borrowing for the remainder of the financial year. The UK is far removed from the extraordinary borrowing levels seen during the pandemic, but the public finances are not in comfortable territory.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n This chart shows how UK government borrowing has been higher so far this financial year (light blue) than in the 2025-26 financial year (dark blue).<\/p>\n Photograph: ONSShare<\/a>How government spending rose in May<\/p>\n Today\u2019s public finances report also shows how inflation drove up the cost of servicing the national debt in May.<\/p>\n The Office for National Statistics reports that the debt interest bill increased by \u00a34.1bn to \u00a311.7bn, due to movements in the Retail Prices Index (RPI) of inflation.<\/p>\n Government spending on services, and benefits such as pensions, both rose too:<\/p>\n The ONS explains:<\/p>\n central government departmental spending on goods and services increased by \u00a32.2bn to \u00a339.6bn, as inflation increased the cost of providing public services<\/p>\n net social benefits paid by central government increased by \u00a31.2bn to \u00a328.4bn; this was largely caused by inflation-linked increases in many benefits, and earnings-linked increases to State Pension payments<\/p>\n