{"id":680828,"date":"2026-07-08T18:08:37","date_gmt":"2026-07-08T18:08:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/680828\/"},"modified":"2026-07-08T18:08:37","modified_gmt":"2026-07-08T18:08:37","slug":"people-systematically-under-and-overestimate-public-engagement-in-climate-action","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/680828\/","title":{"rendered":"People systematically under- and overestimate public engagement in climate action"},"content":{"rendered":"

Stern, P. C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56, 407\u2013424 (2000).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179\u2013211 (1991).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Farrow, K., Grolleau, G. & Ibanez, L. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: a review of the evidence. Ecol. Econ. 140, 1\u201313 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Helferich, M., Th\u00f8gersen, J. & Bergquist, M. Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior. Glob. Environ. Change 80, 102680 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6, 81\u201397 (1999).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bergquist, M., Nilsson Hed, A. & Schultz, W. P. A meta-analysis of field-experiments using social norms to promote pro-environmental behaviors. Glob. Environ. Change 59, 101941 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Constantino, S. M. et al. Scaling up change: a critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 23, 50\u201397 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schneider, C. R. & van der Linden, S. Social norms as a powerful lever for motivating pro-climate actions. One Earth 6, 346\u2013351 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Andre, P., Boneva, T., Chopra, F. & Falk, A. Misperceived social norms and willingness to act against climate change. Rev. Econ. Stat. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/rest_a_01468<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Andre, P. et al. Globally representative evidence on the actual and perceived support for climate action. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 253\u2013259 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Leviston, Z., Walker, I. & Morwinski, S. Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 334\u2013337 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mildenberger, M. & Tingley, D. Beliefs about climate beliefs: the importance of second-order opinions for climate politics. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 49, 1279\u20131307 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sparkman, G., Geiger, N. & Weber, E. U. Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half. Nat. Commun. 13, 4779 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Geiger, S. J. et al. Understanding the role of pluralistic ignorance in biodiversity conservation: a research agenda. Glob. Environ. Change 95, 103043 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Geiger, N. & Swim, J. K. Climate of silence: pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. J. Environ. Psychol. 47, 79\u201390 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Noelle-Neumann, E. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion\u2014Our Social Skin. 2nd edn (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1993).<\/p>\n

Geiger, S. J. et al. What we think others think and do about climate change: a multicountry test of pluralistic ignorance and public-consensus messaging. Psychol. Sci. 36, 421\u2013442 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sevincer, A. T., Hostloesky, L., Styhler, F. & Hofmann, W. Politicians underestimate support for climate action even more than the general public. Preprint at Open Science Framework https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/kav53_v4<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Dablander, F., Lange, F., Brick, C. & Aron, A. R. Expressing intentions is not climate action. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2512457122 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sheeran, P. & Webb, T. L. The intention\u2013behavior gap. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 10, 503\u2013518 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dixon, G., Clarke, C., Jacquet, J., Evensen, D. T. N. & Hart, P. S. The complexity of pluralistic ignorance in Republican climate change policy support in the United States. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 76 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Guay, B., Marghetis, T., Wong, C. & Landy, D. Quirks of cognition explain why we dramatically overestimate the size of minority groups. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2413064122 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Landy, D., Guay, B. & Marghetis, T. Bias and ignorance in demographic perception. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 1606\u20131618 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fennell, J. & Baddeley, R. Uncertainty plus prior equals rational bias: an intuitive Bayesian probability weighting function. Psychol. Rev. 119, 878\u2013887 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Betsch, C. et al. Modelling the readiness for climate action across individual and system-related behaviours. Preprint at Open Science Framework https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/enkwy<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Castiglione, A., Brick, C., Holden, S., Miles-Urdan, E. & Aron, A. R. Discovering the psychological building blocks underlying climate action: a longitudinal study of real-world activism. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9, 210006 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bechtoldt, M. & Schermelleh-Engel, K. Worry\u2019s clout: concern, not positive affectivity, drives climate activism. J. Environ. Psychol. 101, 102517 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pew Research Center. How Americans View Future Harms From Climate Change in Their Community and Around the US. (2023).<\/p>\n

Goerg, S., Pondorfer, A. & St\u00f6hr, V. Regional variation in social norm nudges. Sci Rep. 14, 16773 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Barnfield, M. et al. Information on public opinion has lasting effects on second-order climate beliefs, but minimal and ephemeral effects on first-order beliefs. J. Environ. Psychol. 110, 102901 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rinscheid, A., Pianta, S. & Weber, E. U. What shapes public support for climate change mitigation policies? The role of descriptive social norms and elite cues. Behav. Public Policy 5, 503\u2013527 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vlasceanu, M. et al. Addressing climate change with behavioral science: a global intervention tournament in 63 countries. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj5778 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tiede, K. E., Maur, K. & Betsch, C. People systematically under- and overestimate public engagement in climate action. Preregistrations, materials, data, and analytical code. Preprint at Open Science Framework https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/KCQ37<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n

Lange, F. & Dewitte, S. The Work for Environmental Protection Task: a consequential web-based procedure for studying pro-environmental behavior. Behav. Res. Methods 54, 133\u2013145 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lange, F. & Dewitte, S. Validity and scope sensitivity of the Work for Environmental Protection Task. J. Environ. Psychol. 86, 101967 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lange, F. & Dewitte, S. Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: a systematic review. Behav. Res. Methods 55, 600\u2013622 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lehrer, L. et al. Study protocol of the planetary health action survey PACE: a serial cross-sectional survey to assess the readiness to act against climate change. BMJ Open 14, e091093 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lees, J., Colaizzi, G., Goldberg, M. H. & Constantino, S. M. Misperceptions of support for climate policy represent multiple phenomena predicted by different factors across intergroup boundaries. Preprint at Open Science Framework https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/vfbq4<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Poortinga, W. The role of policy appraisals and second-order beliefs in public support for climate policies in the UK. Clim. Policy https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14693062.2025.2539977<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sheeran, P. Intention\u2013behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 12, 1\u201336 (2002).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Todorova, B. et al. Machine learning identifies key individual and nation-level factors predicting climate-relevant beliefs and behaviors. npj Clim. Action 4, 46 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Drews, S., Savin, I. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. Biased perceptions of other people\u2019s attitudes to carbon taxation. Energy Policy 167, 113051 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. & Griskevicius, V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms: reprise. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13, 249\u2013254 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ai, P. & Rosenthal, S. The model of norm-regulated responsibility for proenvironmental behavior in the context of littering prevention. Sci. Rep. 14, 9289 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bhanot, S. P. Isolating the effect of injunctive norms on conservation behavior: new evidence from a field experiment in California. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 163, 30\u201342 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bonan, J., Cattaneo, C., d\u2019Adda, G. & Tavoni, M. The interaction of descriptive and injunctive social norms in promoting energy conservation. Nat. Energy 5, 900\u2013909 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Steiger, A. & K\u00fchberger, A. A meta-analytic re-appraisal of the framing effect. Z. Psychol. 226, 1\u201319 (2018).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453\u2013458 (1981).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Goldwert, D. & Vlasceanu, M. An individual\u2013collective\u2013systemic behavioral climate intervention framework. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 65, 101569 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bergquist, M., Thiel, M., Goldberg, M. H. & van der Linden, S. Field interventions for climate change mitigation behaviors: a second-order meta-analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2214851120 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Varotto, A. & Spagnolli, A. Psychological strategies to promote household recycling: a systematic review with meta-analysis of validated field interventions. J. Environ. Psychol. 51, 168\u2013188 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Beiser-McGrath, L. F. & Bernauer, T. Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible?. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax3323 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huber, R. A., Wicki, M. L. & Bernauer, T. Public support for environmental policy depends on beliefs concerning effectiveness, intrusiveness, and fairness. Environ. Polit. 29, 649\u2013673 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jagers, S. C. et al. Bridging the ideological gap? How fairness perceptions mediate the effect of revenue recycling on public support for carbon taxes in the United States, Canada and Germany. Rev. Policy Res. 38, 529\u2013554 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Baranzini, A. et al. Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. WIREs Clim. Change 8, e462 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dechezlepr\u00eatre, A. et al. Fighting climate change: international attitudes toward climate policies. Am. Econ. Rev. 115, 1258\u20131300 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Maestre-Andr\u00e9s, S., Drews, S. & Savin, I. Carbon tax acceptability with information provision and mixed revenue uses. Nat. Commun. 12, 7017 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aasen, M. & Vatn, A. Public attitudes toward climate policies: the effect of institutional contexts and political values. Ecol. Econ. 146, 106\u2013114 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bertolotti, M. & Catellani, P. Bridging the ideological divide: communicating the positive economic impact of climate policy to persuade the right. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 35, e70058 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dasandi, N. et al. Positive, global, and health or environment framing bolsters public support for climate policies. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 239 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Reynolds, J. et al. Communicating the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of government policies and their impact on public support: a systematic review with meta-analysis. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 190522 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tiede, K. E., Temme, H., Lehrer, L. & Betsch, C. Enhancing perceived effectiveness can increase climate policy acceptance. J. Environ. Psychol. 106, 102725 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Walker, B. J. A., Kurz, T. & Russel, D. Towards an understanding of when non-climate frames can generate public support for climate change policy. Environ. Behav. 50, 781\u2013806 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Levontin, L., Gilad, Z., Durango-Cohen, E. & Durango-Cohen, P. The impact factor: the effect of actual impact information and perceived donation efficacy on donors\u2019 repeated donations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 118, 104720 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. Beyond WEIRD: towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 111\u2013135 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).<\/p>\n

Lejarraga, T. & Hertwig, R. How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality. Psychol. Bull. 147, 535\u2013564 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Almaatouq, A. et al. Beyond playing 20 questions with nature: integrative experiment design in the social and behavioral sciences. Behav. Brain Sci. 47, e33 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Baribault, B. et al. Metastudies for robust tests of theory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2607\u20132612 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E. & Yeager, D. S. Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 980\u2013989 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

B\u00fcrkner, P.-C. brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1\u201328 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brooks, S. P. & Gelman, A. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7, 434\u2013455 (1998).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gelman, A., Goodrich, B., Gabry, J. & Vehtari, A. R-squared for Bayesian regression models. Am. Stat. 73, 307\u2013309 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Stern, P. C. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56, 407\u2013424 (2000). Article\u00a0…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":680829,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[556,4422,16159,11549,125827,1397,4423,3250,369,90,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-680828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-environment","tag-climate-change","tag-climate-change-climate-change-impacts","tag-climate-change-mitigation","tag-communication","tag-decision-making","tag-environment","tag-environmental-law-policy-ecojustice","tag-general","tag-psychology","tag-science","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/680828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=680828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/680828\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/680829"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=680828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=680828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=680828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}