Will, C. M. & Yunes, N. Is Einstein Still Right?: Black Holes, Gravitational Waves, and the Quest to Verify Einstein\u2019s Greatest Creation (Oxford Univ. Press, 2020).<\/p>\n
Thorne, K. S., Price, R. H. & Macdonald, D. A. The Membrane Paradigm (Yale Univ. Press, 1986).<\/p>\n
Apostolatos, T. A., Cutler, C., Sussman, G. J. & Thorne, K. S. Spin-induced orbital precession and its modulation of the gravitational waveforms from merging binaries. Phys. Rev. D 49, 6274 (1994).<\/p>\n
Article<\/a>\u00a0 O\u2019Connell, R. F. A note on frame dragging. Class. Quantum Grav. 22, 3815\u20133816 (2005).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. Dragging of inertial frames. Nature 449, 41\u201347 (2007).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I., Matzner, R., Gurzadyan, V. & Penrose, R. A new laser-ranged satellite for General Relativity and Space Geodesy III. De Sitter effect and the LARES 2 space experiment. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 819 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Smith, T. L., Erickcek, A., Caldwell, R. & Kamionkowski, M. Effects of Chern\u2013Simons gravity on bodies orbiting the Earth. Phys. Rev. D 77, 024015 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Stephon, A. & Yunes, N. New post-Newtonian parameter to test chern-simons gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 241101 (2007).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. et al. A new laser-ranged satellite for general relativity and space geodesy: I. An introduction to the LARES 2 space experiment. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 336 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 M\u00fcller, J. et al. Lunar Laser Ranging: a tool for general relativity, lunar geophysics and Earth science. J. Geodesy 93, 2195 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pearlman, M. et al. Laser geodetic satellites: a high-accuracy scientific tool. J. Geodesy 93, 2181 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. & Pavlis, E. C. A confirmation of the general relativistic prediction of the Lense\u2013Thirring effect. Nature 431, 958\u2013960 (2004).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. et al. An improved test of the general relativistic effect of frame-dragging using the LARES and LAGEOS satellites. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 872 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Everitt, C. W. et al. Gravity Probe B: final results of a space experiment to test general relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 221101 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lense, J. & Thirring, H. Uber den Einfluss der Eigenrotation der Zentralko\u00a8rper auf die Bewegung der Planeten und Monde nach der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie. Phys. Z. 19, 156\u2013163 (1918).<\/p>\n Einstein, A. Grundgedanken der allgemeinen Relativit\u00e4tstheorie und anwendung dieser theorie in der astronomie, sitzungsher. Preuss Akad. Wiss. 778\u2013786, 799\u2013801 (1915).<\/p>\n Zeldovich, YaB & Novikov, I. D. Relativistic Astrophysics Vol. I Stars and Relativity (Univ. Chicago Press, 1971).<\/p>\n Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. The Classical Theory of Fields 3rd rev., English edn. (Pergamon, 1971).<\/p>\n Weinberg, S. Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (Wiley, 1972).<\/p>\n Hawking, S. W. & Ellis, G. F. R. The Large Structure of Space-time (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1973).<\/p>\n Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S. & Wheeler, J. A. Gravitation (Freeman, 1973).<\/p>\n Hawking, S. & Penrose R. The Nature of Space and Time (Princeton Univ. Press, 2010).<\/p>\n Will, C. M. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).<\/p>\n Will, C. M. The confrontation between general relativity and experiment. Living Rev. Relativ. 17, 4 (2014).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. & Wheeler, J. A. Gravitation and Inertia (Princeton Univ. Press, 1995).<\/p>\n Kopeikin S. et al. Frontiers in Relativistic Celestial Mechanics Vol. 2 (de Gruyter, 2014).<\/p>\n Penrose, R. Gravitational collapse and space\u2013time singularities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Abbott, B. P. et al. Tests of general relativity with GW150914. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Thorne, K. S. LIGO and gravitational waves, III: Nobel lecture, December 8, 2017. Ann. Phys. 531, 1800350 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Riess, A. G. et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astron. J. 116, 1009\u20131038 (1998).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Perlmutter, S. et al. Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high-redshift supernovae. Astrophys. J. 517, 565\u2013586 (1999).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Caldwell, R. R. Dark energy. Phys. World 17, 37 (2004).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. Measurement of the Lense\u2013Thirring drag on high-altitude laser-ranged artificial satellites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 278 (1986).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. A comprehensive introduction to the Lageos gravitomagnetic experiment: from the importance of the gravitomagnetic field in physics to preliminary error analysis and error budget. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4, 3083\u20133145 (1989).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. et al. The LARES 2 satellite, general relativity and fundamental physics. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 87 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Kaula, W. M. Theory of Satellite Geodesy (Blaisdell, 1966).<\/p>\n Ciufolini, I. Theory and experiments in general relativity and other metric theories. PhD Dissertation, Univ. Texas, Austin (1984).<\/p>\n Ries, J. C. Simulation of an experiment to measure the Lense\u2013Thirring precession using a second LAGEOS satellite. PhD Dissertation, Univ. Texas, Austin (1989).<\/p>\n Peterson, G. E. Estimation of the Lense\u2013Thirring precession using laser-ranged satellites. PhD Dissertation, Univ. of Texas, Austin (1997).<\/p>\n Tapley, B. D. & Ciufolini, I. Measuring the Lense-Thirring Precession Using a Second LAGEOS Satellite CSR-UT Report 89-3 (Texas Scholar Works depository, 1989); https:\/\/doi.org\/10.26153\/tsw\/63964<\/a><\/p>\n Ciufolini, I. et al. A new laser-ranged satellite for general relativity and space geodesy: II. Monte Carlo simulations and covariance analyses of the LARES 2 experiment. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 337 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. et al. A new laser-ranged satellite for general relativity and space geodesy: IV. Thermal drag and the LARES 2 space experiment. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 333 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ciufolini, I. et al. ASI-NASA Study on LAGEOS III (NASA, 1989); https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/citations\/19910004157<\/a><\/p>\n Ray, R. D. & Merrifield, M. A. The semiannual and 4.4-year modulations of extreme high tides. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 5907\u20135922 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bertotti, B. & Carpino, M. Supplementary satellites and tidal perturbations. In ASI-NASA Study on LAGEOS III (ed. Ciufolini I. et al.) (NASA, 1989); https:\/\/ntrs.nasa.gov\/citations\/19910004157<\/a><\/p>\n Pucacco, G. & Lucchesi, D. M. Tidal effects on the LAGEOS\u2013LARES satellites and the LARASE program. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 130, 66 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gurzadyan, V. G., Ciufolini, I., Khachatryan, H. G., Mirzoyan, S. & Paolozzi, A. On the Earth\u2019s tidal perturbations. II. LARES 2 satellite. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 512 (2025).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ries, J. C. et al. Development and Evaluation of the Global Gravity Model GGM05C CSR-16-02 (ICGEM, 2016); https:\/\/icgem.gfz.de\/tom_longtime<\/a>.<\/p>\n Tapley, B. D., Bettadpur, S., Watkins, M. & Reigber, C. The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L09607 (2004).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Landerer, F. W. et al. Extending the global mass change data record: GRACE follow-on instrument and science data performance. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, 12 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Chen, W. & Shen, W. New estimates of the inertia tensor and rotation of the triaxial nonrigid Earth. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B12419 (2010).<\/p>\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0 Petit, G. G. & Luzum, B. (eds) IERS Technical Note No. 36, 2010 IERS Conventions, Frankfurt am Main Verlag des Bundesamts f\u00fcr Kartographie und Geodaesie (IERS, 2010).<\/p>\n Ray, R. D. Precise comparisons of bottom-pressure and altimetric ocean tides. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 118, 4570 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ray, R. D. Documentation for Goddard Ocean Tide Solution GOT5: Global Tides from Multi-mission Satellite Altimetry TM-20250002085 (NASA, 2025).<\/p>\n Otsubo, T. et al. Rapid response quality control service for the laser ranging tracking network. J. Geod. 93, 2335\u20132344 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lucchesi, D. M. & Balmino, G. The LAGEOS satellites orbital residuals determination and the Lense\u2013Thirring effect measurement. Planet. Space Sci. 54, 581 (2006).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pavlis, D. E. et al. GEODYN Systems Description Vols. 1 and 3 (NASA, 1998).<\/p>\n Pavlis, E. C. & Luceri, V. The ILRS contribution to ITRF2020 (ITRF, 2022); https:\/\/itrf.ign.fr\/docs\/solutions\/itrf2020\/The_ILRS_contribution_to_ITRF2020_description_2022.09.23.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n So\u015bnica, K. & Ga\u0142dyn, F. Orbital relativistic correction resulting from the Earth\u2019s oblateness term. J. Geod. 99, 52 (2025).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Soffel, M. et al. Relativistic effects in the motion of artificial satellites: the oblateness of the central body I. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 42, 81\u201389 (1987).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Will, C. M. Relativistic gravity in the Solar System. III. Experimental disproof of a class of linear theories of gravitation. Astrophys. J. 185, 31\u201342 (1973).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Will, C. M. & Nordtvedt, K. Jr. Conservation laws and preferred frames in relativistic gravity. Astrophys. J. 177, 757\u2013774 (1972).<\/p>\n Nordtvedt, K. Jr & Will, C. M. Conservation laws and preferred frames in relativistic gravity. II. Experimental evidence to rule out preferred-frame theories of gravity. Astrophys. J. 177, 775\u2013792 (1972).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Will, C. M. Theoretical frameworks for testing relativistic gravity. II. Parametrized post-Newtonian hydrodynamics, and the Nordtvedt effect. Astrophys. J. 163, 611\u2013627 (1971).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Thorne, K. S. & Will, C. M. Theoretical frameworks for testing relativistic gravity. I. Foundations. Astrophys. J. 163, 595\u2013610 (1971).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Nordtvedt, K. Jr. Equivalence principle for massive bodies. II. Theory. Phys. Rev. 169, 1017\u20131025 (1968).<\/p>\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0 Chandrasekhar, S. & Contopoulos, G. On a post-Galilean transformation appropriate to the post-Newtonian theory of Einstein, Infeld and Hoffmann. Proc. R. Soc. A 298, 123\u2013141 (1967).<\/p>\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0 Schiff, L. I. in Relativity Theory and Astrophysics, 1: Relativity and Cosmology (ed. Ehlers, J.) 105 (American Mathematical Society, 1967).<\/p>\n Chandrasekhar, S. The post-Newtonian equations of hydrodynamics in general relativity. Astrophys. J. 142, 1488\u20131512 (1965).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Freire, P. C. C. & Wex, N. Gravity experiments with radio pulsars. Living Rev. Relativ. 27, 5 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Particle Data Group. Experimental Tests of Gravitational Theory (2025).<\/p>\n Soffel, M. et al. The IAU 2000 resolutions for astrometry, celestial mechanics and metrology in the relativistic framework: explanatory supplement. Astron. J. 126, 2687\u20132706 (2003).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Brumberg, V. Essential Relativistic Celestial Mechanics (CRC, 2017).<\/p>\n Damour, T., Soffel, M. & Xu, C. General-relativistic celestial mechanics. I. Method and definition of reference systems. Phys. Rev. D 43, 3273\u20133307 (1991).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Roh, K.-M., Kopeikin, S. M. & Cho, J.-H. Numerical simulation of the post-Newtonian equations of motion for the near-Earth satellite with an application to the LARES satellite. Adv. Space Res. 58, 2255\u20132268 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ashby, N. & Bertotti, B. Relativistic perturbations of an Earth Satellite. Phys. Rev- Lett. 52, 485\u2013488 (1984).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ashby, N. & Bertotti, B. Relativistic effects in local inertial frames. Phys. Rev. D 34, 2246\u20132259 (1986).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bertotti, B., Ciufolini, I. & Bender, P. L. New test of general relativity: measurement of de Sitter geodetic precession rate for lunar perigee. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1062\u20131065 (1987).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Huang, C. et al. Relativistic effects for near-earth satellite orbit determination. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 48, 167\u2013185 (1990).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rubincam, D. P. Yarkovsky thermal drag on LAGEOS. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 93, 13805\u201313810 (1988).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rubincam, D. P. Drag on the LAGEOS satellite. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 95, 4881\u20134886 (1990).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Andr\u00e9s de la Fuente, J. I. & Noomen, R. Enhanced Modelling of the Non-Gravitational Forces Acting on LAGEOS. In Proc. 15th International Workshop on Laser Ranging Instrumentation (ILRS LW15) (Delft University of Technology, 2006).<\/p>\n Couhert, A. et al. Self-consistent determination of the Earth\u2019s GM, geocenter motion and figure axis orientation. J. Geodesy 94, 113 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gao, D. & Ni, W.-T. Frame-dragging effects in a gravitational quantum field theory. Phys. Rev. D 111, 084039 (2025).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hartle, J. B. & Thorne, K. S. Slowly rotating relativistic stars. II. Models for neutron stars and supermassive stars. Astrophys. J. 153, 807\u2013834 (1968).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Kerr, R. P. Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237\u2013238 (1963).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Abac, A. G. et al. GW250114: Testing Hawking\u2019s area law and the Kerr nature of black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 111403 (2025).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Chandrasekhar, S. On stars, their evolution and their stability: Nobel lecture, December 8, 1983. Science 226, 497\u2013505 (1984).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Will, C. M. & Yunes, N. Is Einstein Still Right?: Black Holes, Gravitational Waves, and the Quest to…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":682529,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[61402,59,4230,4231,90,56,54,55],"class_list":["post-682528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-science","tag-computational-astrophysics","tag-gb","tag-humanities-and-social-sciences","tag-multidisciplinary","tag-science","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom","tag-unitedkingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=682528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682528\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/682529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=682528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=682528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=682528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}