The court would need to pass an Act of Common Council and “confer the power of disenfranchisement on itself” for the process to move forward. <\/p>\n
Other options are also being explored.<\/p>\n
Deputy Hayward said work was under way to finalise and publish the draft bill. It is due to go before the Policy and Resources Committee in September and then the Court in October.<\/p>\n
Deputy Hayward said: “The City Solicitor and the Remembrancer have both asked me to point out that this is a substantial piece of work with significant constitutional implications which need to be carefully considered by members, to ensure that the new process is, as far as possible, lawful and workable with no unintended consequences.”<\/p>\n
If the Act is passed, a further report will be brought forward “in the following cycle”, giving members the opportunity to remove Mountbatten-Windsor’s Freedom.<\/p>\n
A Corporation spokesperson said: “The fastest and most appropriate approach is to put in place a lawful process that allows the City Corporation to make these decisions itself, rather than seeking legislation through Parliament.<\/p>\n
“We are progressing that work and, if elected members approve the new process, they will then be able to consider whether Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Freedom should be removed.”<\/p>\n
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service<\/a>, which covers councils and other public service organisations.<\/p>\n Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds<\/a> and follow BBC London on Facebook, external<\/a>, X, external<\/a> and Instagram, external<\/a>. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk, external<\/a><\/p>\n