Your support helps us to tell the story<\/p>\n
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.<\/p>\n
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.<\/p>\n
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.<\/p>\n
Your support makes all the difference.Read more<\/p>\n
From Nethy Bridge in the Cairngorms, to Bordeaux<\/a> and its coastal peninsula, Cap Ferret, and then on to Madrid, communities across Europe<\/a> are being forced to run for their lives from the wildfires<\/a> now raging uncontrollably.<\/p>\n It is as if nature is biting back. Millions of people are affected directly or indirectly. Crops \u2013 including prized vineyards<\/a> \u2013 are lost or at risk, property<\/a> and businesses destroyed, tourism devastated. <\/p>\n The weather maps<\/a> show such blazes at increasing probability of breaking out in an arc running from Portugal to Romania, also taking in much of the British isles \u2013 braced for its fourth heatwave<\/a> of the summer \u2013 and even northern Finland<\/a>. This is not \u201cjust weather\u201d, but a series of no-longer freakish events that are the most tangible proof yet of the science of climate change.<\/p>\n That they are sometimes not unprecedented is hardly a source of comfort, given that the last such outbreaks were only a year or so ago. Thus, while some 1,254 major forest fires have been recorded in Europe this year, slightly down on the equivalent period in 2025, this is much more than double the longer-term average of 579 incidents. <\/p>\n Of course, neither is this a purely European matter, nor just one of heat, though the Old World is sweltering more than most. A similar \u201cheat zone\u201d, the third this year, is also settling over about 70 million people in North America, from the Great Plains to the Gulf of Mexico, while smoke from Canadian wildfires<\/a> is still billowing south to New York.<\/p>\n Earlier this year, climate change contributed to deadly floods across much of sub-Saharan Africa and tropical storms in southeast Asia. Meanwhile, the full El Ni\u00f1o effect<\/a> is yet to materialise, and active glacier melt accelerates in Greenland (another excellent reason to keep Donald Trump out of the Danish territory).<\/p>\n As ever, not every extreme event should be lazily attributed to climate change, but recent events do bear out the scientific evidence for this long-term trend, and serve as a timely reminder that there is worse to come. Science can provide explanations and propose solutions \u2013 such as limiting the increase in global temperatures to 1.5C over pre-industrial levels.<\/p>\n But action is a matter for politics, and it is a tragedy that in recent years, the consensus about climate change and value of global net zero targets<\/a> has slipped so badly. In the UK, the new Burnham administration seems keen to slide back into drilling for more North Sea oil<\/a> and gas.<\/p>\n Reform UK has made much populist electoral progress by promoting a mix of anti-science conspiracy theories and nihilism \u2013 the notion that nothing can be done even if it is man-made, so why bother? Even the Green Party under Zack Polanski<\/a> has rearranged its agenda to put Gaza at the centre of its offering, at the expense of more traditional, ecological causes.<\/p>\n However, it is within the Conservative Party, still the alternative government, that the regression has been so inexplicable and regrettable. Ever since Margaret Thatcher (a chemist by training) made a landmark speech<\/a> in 1988 at the UN General Assembly on the subject, the party has been at the forefront of international efforts to protect life on earth. There can be few nobler causes.<\/p>\n When David Cameron became leader two decades ago, he too championed the environment, famously going to the Arctic to \u201chug a husky\u201d<\/a>. Theresa May made a binding commitment to make the British economy \u201cnet zero\u201d, and Boris Johnson, for all his baleful defects, kept up the momentum at COP summits. <\/p>\n Now, however, Kemi Badenoch, a self-confessed \u201cnet zero sceptic\u201d, says she will block prospective Conservative candidates and former MPs from standing for her party if they support the UK 2050 net zero targets. It is a ludicrous volte-face for a democratic organisation with a proud record in this field. The shift is based entirely on a perhaps wilful misapprehension about the nature of green, renewable energy \u2013 something Ms Badenoch unfortunately shares with Nigel Farage<\/a>. <\/p>\n The basic truth about solar and wind power (as well as a nuclear base load) is that although the initial capital investment can be costly, the reward is a plentiful, stable, cheap and abundant supply of energy<\/a>, liberating the UK from the unstable fossil-fuel economy and its volatile prices. Saving the planet is just a bonus. <\/p>\n